Back to top

SETTLEMENT, WAIVER AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

Waiver Agreement

SETTLEMENT, WAIVER AND RELEASE AGREEMENT | Document Parties: ATLAS MINING CO You are currently viewing:
This Waiver Agreement involves

ATLAS MINING CO

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: SETTLEMENT, WAIVER AND RELEASE AGREEMENT
Governing Law: Idaho     Date: 7/28/2009
Industry: Non-Metallic Mining     Sector: Basic Materials

SETTLEMENT, WAIVER AND RELEASE AGREEMENT, Parties: atlas mining co
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

 




 

Exhibit 10.16

 

SETTLEMENT, WAIVER AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

 

 

This Settlement, Waiver and Release Agreement dated as of June _______, 2009 (“ Agreement ”) is by and among Robert Dumont, 906 McKinley Avenue, Kellogg, ID 83837 (“ Dumont ”), on one hand, and Atlas Mining Company, 1221 Yellowstone, Osburn, ID  83849 (“ Atlas ”), on the other hand.  Dumont and Atlas are collectively referred to in this Agreement as the “Parties.”

 

I.      RECITALS

 

 

A.  

Dumont executed an Employment Agreement dated July 9, 2007 (“ Employment Agreement ”) (a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A ), which provided that he would serve as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a director of Atlas.   Dumont began such employment with Atlas.

 

B.  

Dumont resigned from that employment and as a director with Atlas on or about November 27, 2007 and asserted that his resignation was justified because he was wrongfully induced to accept employment with Atlas by misrepresentations made to him by Atlas and its representatives.  Dumont also asserts that shortly after executing the Employment Agreement, through no fault of his own and in spite of discharging his duties on behalf of Atlas in good faith, he was named as a defendant in several lawsuits claiming violations of the federal securities laws arising out of the conduct of others predating Dumont’s employment at Atlas.  Dumont claims that he was entitled to rescind the Employment Agreement and to recover monetary damages resulting from the alleged misrepresentations of Atlas and its representatives.  Atlas denies the underlying factual claims made by Dumont, and the monetary relief he claims, but agrees, for separate reasons, that the Parties previously intended that the Employment Agreement be rescinded.  It has been and remains Atlas’s position that Dumont’s resignation was a breach of the Employment Agreement, and that such breach was also a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and that such conduct relieved and excused Atlas of performance under the Employment Agreement, including, without limitation, relieving Atlas of obligations set forth in Paragraph 4 of the Employment Agreement.  As a result of both Parties’ positions, the Parties agree that, other than with respect to wages, compensation and other benefits already physically tendered, transferred and paid to Dumont by Atlas with respect to the period of his active employment, and other than various indemnification issues relating to such employment as expressly described herein, the Employment Agreement has been, and remains, rescinded nunc pro tunc by the parties.

 

 

 


 

 

 

C.  

Atlas, Dumont and others were sued or otherwise involved in various matters described below, giving rise to various claims of indemnification by Dumont against Atlas and/or claims for coverage by Dumont and Atlas against their insurers.

 

D.  

 Dumont and Atlas desire to resolve controversies existing between them and to facilitate the final resolution of the Atlas Litigation upon the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.


 

E.  

The Parties have entered into this Agreement to avoid the expense, inconvenience, and uncertainty of litigation.  By making the payments pursuant to this Agreement, neither Atlas nor any Released Parties admits that such sums were owed to Dumont, or that Dumont was entitled to such sums, but rather makes such payments solely in order to settle and resolve the claims Released herein.

 

 

II.      AGREEMENT

 

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement, and other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged by Atlas and Dumont, Atlas and Dumont agree as follows:

 

 

 

1.      ATTORNEYS’ FEES, INDEMNIFICATION AND UNDERTAKINGS.

 

 

(a)             Atlas, Dumont and others were sued or involved in various “actions” giving rise to various claims of indemnification by Dumont against Atlas and/or claims for coverage by Dumont and Atlas against their insurers.  Actions relevant to Dumont’s tenure as an officer and director of Atlas, listed below, are in progress against Atlas and Dumont, and Dumont has claimed that he is entitled to be reimbursed for certain legal fees and costs he allegedly incurred relating to them.  These actions are: Benson v. Atlas Mining Company , Cons. Case No. CV 07-428-N-EJL-MHW (D. Idaho) (“Class Action Litigation”); Navigators Ins. Co. v. Atlas Mining Co., No. 08-0216 (D. Id.) / Atlas Mining Co. v. Navigators Ins. Co., No. 08-359 (D. Id.) (“Coverage Litigation”) (the Class Action Litigation and Coverage Litigation shall be referred to collectively as the “Atlas Litigation”).  Dumont has claimed that he is entitled to be reimbursed for certain legal fees he allegedly incurred relating to the Atlas Litigation.


 

 

 

 


 

 

 

(b)             Atlas shall indemnify Dumont for his reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs, and expenses incurred through May 31, 2009 relating to the Atlas Litigation up to a cap of $185,000.  Dumont’s legal bills shall be submitted confidentially to Mediator Jed Melnick who shall review the bills to ensure that the fees and costs being sought by Dumont relate to the Atlas Litigation and are reasonable.  Mr. Melnick shall inform the Parties as to the amount of fees, costs and expenses that are to be indemnified under this Section, and the Parties agree that Mr. Melnick’s determination of this issue shall be final, conclusive and binding on this issue.  This indemnification payment shall be made from insurance proceeds paid to Atlas pursuant to Section 3 below.

 

(c)             In connection with the indemnification payment required by section 1(b), Dumont shall execute the “Undertaking of Robert Dumont re: Atlas Litigation,” attached hereto as Exhibit B .  Atlas represents that, based on its current knowledge of the facts and investigations performed to date on Atlas’ behalf, it has no basis for asserting that Dumont has not met the relevant standards of conduct for permissive indemnification described in Section 30-1-851 of the Idaho Code.

 

(d)                 Atlas shall indemnify and hold harmless Dumont against all liability, expenses and losses, including attorneys’ fees and costs, reasonably incurred or suffered by Dumont in the event he is made a party to, is threatened to be made a party to, or is involuntarily involved in, any action, suit, claim or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, arbitrative or investigative, formal or informal (hereinafter “Proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he was an officer, director, employee or agent of Atlas, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, to the fullest extent permissible under Idaho law.  While any such Proceeding is pending, Atlas shall reimburse Dumont’s reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs on an ongoing basis.  To obtain indemnification or ongoing reimbursement under this paragraph, Dumont shall submit to Atlas a written request, including therewith such documentation and information reasonably necessary to determine whether or to what extent Dumont is entitled to indemnification.  With forty-five (45) days of receipt of such a request, Atlas shall make payment to Dumont or his designee of all amounts due under this paragraph.

 

(e)                 Atlas agrees that its duty to indemnify and provide ongoing reimbursement to Dumont pursuant to Section 1(d) includes, but is not limited to, a duty to indemnify and provide ongoing reimbursement in the event that Dumont involuntarily becomes involved in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) formal investigation of Atlas and former Atlas officers and directors, pertaining to potential violations of federal securities laws (“SEC Investigation”).

 

 

 


 

 

 

(f)           To the extent that Dumont is involuntarily brought into a Proceeding in the future because of his prior employment with Atlas, and seeks advancement and indemnification of fees from Atlas pursuant to Section 1(d) of this Agreement, to be eligible for an advancement of fees and costs, he shall execute and deliver to Atlas the same form of truthful Undertaking (with the exception of the case identification in the initial “Whereas” clause), which upon delivery of the Undertaking shall bind both Dumont and Atlas to its terms, provisions, and conditions.  Dumont represents that other than the Atlas Litigation, Dumont and his counsel have not been contacted regarding any matter or claims that may relate to his employment with Atlas.

 

(g)           Atlas shall in no way be liable under Section 1(d) of this Agreement for any fees or costs Dumont has or may incur in litigating any disputes with or against Atlas.

 

(h)           To the extent that Dumont seeks fees and costs incurred in connection with the Atlas Litigation post-dating May 31, 2009, such fees shall be capped at a $5,000 and shall in no event exceed that amount.  To the extent that any fees and costs incurred after May 31, 2009 are sought by Dumont under Section 1(d) in connection with the Atlas Litigation and Dumont’s entitlement to reimbursement of those fees and costs are disputed by Atlas, the Parties agree that the dispute will be submitted to Jed Melnick for final resolution.  Mr. Melnick’s determination of the amount of fees and costs (within the $5,000 maximum cap applicable to fees incurred after May 31, 2009), due under this provision will be final, conclusive and binding.

 

2.             RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ATLAS LITIGATION AND RIGHT TO EXTINGUISH THE AGREEMENT.  This Agreement is premised upon settlement and resolution of the Atlas Litigation.  To the extent that: (i) the Coverage Litigation is not settled pursuant to a written, fully executed settlement agreement executed by, among others, Atlas and Dumont; (ii)  the Class Action Litigation is not settled pursuant to a written, fully executed settlement agreement executed by, among others, Atlas and Dumont; and/or (iii) any agreed Class Action Litigation settlement is not fully approved by the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, or any subsequent appellate court, Atlas or Dumont are entitled to extinguish this Agreement and none of the payments articulated in Section 4 shall be due to Dumont.  To the extent that Atlas and Dumont opt to extinguish this Agreement, they must do so in writing, upon which this Agreement shall be null and void with no legal effect, except that payments made pursuant to Sections 1(b), 3(a), 3(b) need not be returned and, to the extent that Dumont has received any funds pursuant to Section 1(b) above, Dumont shall be bound by his executed Undertaking.

 

 

 


 

 

 

Beginning as of the date of this Agreement, Dumont shall cooperate fully with and assist in all respects Atlas and its directors, executive officers, senior-level employees, insurers, duly authorized agents, successors, trustees, assigns, attorneys and experts acting on behalf of the Atlas:  (i) with the closing of settlements in the Class Action Litigation and (ii) to finalize matters with the insurance carriers.  To the extent that Atlas and the Plaintiffs are able to reach resolution of the Class Action Litigation, Dumont will not oppose the District Court’s approval of settlement of the Class Action Litigation or the release of the $2 million in insurance proceeds as contemplated in the draft insurance settlement and release agreement (attached as Exhibit C).

 

3.             PAYMENT OF INSURANCE PROCEEDS AND REIMBURSEMENT ASSOCIATED WITH CLASS ACTION LITIGATION.   In conjunction with this Agreement, Dumont and Atlas, among others, are negotiating a Settlement Agreement and Release, a draft of which is attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement.  To the extent that the Settlement and Release Agreement is finally executed, and assuming the parties file the Consent Motion to Distribute contemplated in Section 4 of the Settlement Agreement and Release:

 

a.           Dumont agrees to and shall cooperate with any efforts to facilitate the insurance carriers’ release and payment of $750,000 of insurance proceeds to Atlas as contemplated by Paragraph 4 of Exhibit C (Insurance Settlement and Release Agreement), including by providing the release with respect to the payment of $750,000 contemplated in Paragraph 5 of Exhibit C.

 

b.           Pursuant to the terms of Paragraph 4(c) of the Exhibit C (Insurance Settlement and Release Agreement), Atlas will pay to Dumont or his attorneys the amount deemed by Jed Melnick to be due pursuant to Section 1(a) of this Agreement.  This payment will be made from the $750,000 in insurance proceeds paid to Atlas as contemplated by Paragraph 4 of Exhibit C within five (5) days upon receipt by Atlas of the $750,000 insurance payment.

 

c.        &nb


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more