Back to top

SECOND AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT

Waiver Agreement

SECOND AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT | Document Parties: GALLAGHER ARTHUR J &| CO | Citibank, N.A.,  | Bank of America, N.A.,  | Comerica Bank |  Barclays Bank Plc You are currently viewing:
This Waiver Agreement involves

GALLAGHER ARTHUR J &| CO | Citibank, N.A., | Bank of America, N.A., | Comerica Bank | Barclays Bank Plc

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: SECOND AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
Governing Law: Illinois     Date: 5/2/2005
Industry: Insurance (Miscellaneous)     Sector: Financial

SECOND AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO CREDIT AGREEMENT, Parties: gallagher arthur j &, co , citibank  n.a.   , bank of america  n.a.   , comerica bank ,  barclays bank plc
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.8.2

 

A RTHUR J. G ALLAGHER & C O .

S ECOND A MENDMENT AND W AIVER TO C REDIT A GREEMENT

 

 

 

 

Harris Trust and Savings Bank

Chicago, Illinois

 

Citibank, N.A.

New York, New York

 

 

Bank of America, N.A.

Chicago, Illinois

 

LaSalle Bank National Association

Chicago, Illinois

 

 

Barclays Bank Plc

Chicago, Illinois

 

Union Bank of California, N.A.

Los Angeles, California

 

 

U.S. Bank National Association

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

 

Fifth Third Bank (Chicago)

Rolling Meadows, Illinois

 

 

Comerica Bank

Detroit, Michigan

 

PNC Bank

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

This Second Amendment and Waiver to Credit Agreement dated as of March 4, 2005 (herein, the “Amendment” ) is entered into by and between the undersigned, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower” ), the Banks and the Agent. Reference is hereby made to that certain Credit Agreement dated as of July 21, 2003 (said Credit Agreement, as amended prior to the date hereof, being referred to herein as the “Credit Agreement” ) between the Borrower, Citibank, N.A., Bank of America, N.A., LaSalle Bank National Association, Barclays Bank Plc, Union Bank of California, N.A., U.S. Bank National Association, Fifth Third Bank (Chicago), Comerica Bank, PNC Bank and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, individually and as Agent. All capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the same meanings herein as such terms have in the Credit Agreement.

 

The Borrower has requested that the Banks amend certain representations contained in the Credit Agreement and waive certain potential Defaults or Events of Default arising by reason of the Utah Verdict and the Related Accounting Treatment (each as hereinafter defined), and the Banks are willing to do so under the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.

 

S ECTION 1. A MENDMENTS .

 

Subject to the satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in Section 3 below, the Credit Agreement shall be and hereby is amended as follows:

 

1.1. The definition of the term “L/C Commitment” appearing in Section 6.1 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:


“L/C Commitment” means $125,000,000, as such amount may be reduced pursuant to the terms hereof.”

 

1.2. Section 7.6 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

Section 7.6. No Material Adverse Change. Since December 31, 2004, except as previously disclosed in the Borrower’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005, there has been no change in the condition (financial or otherwise) or business prospects of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries taken as a whole which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.”

 

1.3. Section 7.9 of the Credit Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

 

Section 7.9. Litigation and Other Controversies Except as otherwise disclosed in (i) the Borrower’s financial statements heretofore delivered to the Agent and (ii) the Borrower’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 14, 2005, there is no litigation or governmental proceeding or labor controversy pending, nor to the knowledge of the Borrower threatened, against the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries which could reasonably be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.”

 

S ECTION 2. W AIVERS .

 

On February 11, 2005, a jury in the Fourth District Court for the State of Utah rendered a verdict against AJG Financial Services, Inc. ( “AJGFS ”), a Material Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of the Borrower, in favor of Headwaters Incorporated in the approximate


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more