Back to top

VOTING AGREEMENT

Voting Agreement

VOTING AGREEMENT | Document Parties: PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD You are currently viewing:
This Voting Agreement involves

PHOENIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: VOTING AGREEMENT
Governing Law: Delaware     Date: 2/13/2007
Industry: Software and Programming    

VOTING AGREEMENT, Parties: phoenix technologies ltd
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day
 

Exhibit 10.1

EXECUTION COPY

AGREEMENT

     This Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into as of February 12, 2007, by and between Phoenix Technologies Ltd. (the “Company” or “Phoenix Technologies”), and the entities and natural persons listed on Schedule A hereto (collectively, the “Ramius Group”) (each of the Company and the Ramius Group, a “Party” to this Agreement, and collectively, the “Parties”).

RECITALS

     A. The Ramius Group beneficially owns in the aggregate 3,502,941 shares of outstanding Phoenix Technologies Common Stock and has initiated a proxy solicitation (the “Proxy Solicitation”) to elect two individuals to the Phoenix Technologies Board of Directors (the “Phoenix Technologies Board”);

     B. The Parties have agreed that the Ramius Group shall withdraw its nominees to the Phoenix Technologies Board and terminate the Proxy Solicitation and that the Ramius Group will not present any nominees or proposals at the Company’s 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (including any adjournment or postponement thereof, the “Annual Meeting”);

     C. The Phoenix Technologies Board has determined that it is in the best interests of the stockholders of the Company to nominate John Mutch and Robert J. Majteles (collectively, the “Nominees”) for election to the Phoenix Technologies Board as Class 2 directors at the Company’s Annual Meeting in place of David S. Dury and Taher Elgamal and to recommend the Nominees for election to the Phoenix Technologies Board;

     D. The Ramius Group has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the Nominees at the Annual Meeting;

     E. Concurrently with the execution of this Agreement, the Company is entering into an agreement (the “AWM Agreement”) with certain entities and individuals affiliated with Austin W. Marxe (the “AWM Group”), pursuant to which, among other things, the AWM Group has agreed to vote its shares in favor of the Nominees at the Annual Meeting; and

     F. The Company and the Ramius Group desire, in connection with the nomination of the Nominees to the Phoenix Technologies Board, to make certain covenants and agreements with one another pursuant to this Agreement.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and premises set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto hereby agree as follows:

     1. The Ramius Group hereby withdraws its nomination of Philip Moyer and John Mutch, withdraws and terminates the Proxy Solicitation and shall promptly file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) a request to withdraw the Schedule 14A filed by the Ramius

 


 

Group. The Ramius Group shall also (i) promptly file with the SEC as definitive additional soliciting materials on Schedule 14A, the press release described in Section 13, the form of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto, and shall indicate that it is no longer soliciting proxies and does not intend to vote any proxies it has received or receives and (ii) take any other actions necessary to terminate the Proxy Solicitation.

     2. The Company shall promptly amend the Schedule 14A filed by the Company and the Company Board to indicate that (i) the Nominees are nominated as the sole nominees for election as Class 2 directors at the Annual Meeting, (ii) David S. Dury and Taher Elgamal will not stand for election at the Annual Meeting, (iii) the Company’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “for” the Nominees at the Annual Meeting, and (iv) proxies solicited by the Board of Directors of the Company will be voted “for” the Nominees at the Annual Meeting.

     3. At the Annual Meeting, the Ramius Group agrees to appear in person or by proxy and vote all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and its controlled affiliates in favor of the election to the Phoenix Technologies Board of the Nominees. The Ramius Group shall cause to be executed proxies for the Nominees (in the form utilized by the Company to solicit proxies for all stockholders) so as to vote all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by it and its controlled affiliates in favor of the election of the Nominees to the Phoenix Technologies Board. The Ramius Group shall not withdraw or modify any such proxies.

     4. The Ramius Group agrees not to nominate any other person for election at the Annual Meeting or to otherwise bring any business before the Annual Meeting.

     5. From the date hereof through the Annual Meeting, each of the Company and the Ramius Group agree they shall not directly or indirectly engage in any activities in opposition to the election of the Nominees as the sole directors elected at the Annual Meeting.

     6. In accordance with the Company’s bylaws, the Company shall take all action necessary in furtherance of (and John Mutch, as a director, agrees to vote in favor of):

          (a) following the election of the Nominees to the Phoenix Technologies Board, the appointment of (i) John Mutch as a member, but not chairman, of the Audit Committee of the Phoenix Technologies Board and (ii) Robert J. Majteles as a member, but not chairman, of the Nominating and Governance Committee of the Phoenix Technologies Board, in each case provided that the director is qualified to serve on such committee under applicable law and listing standards; and

          (b) following the Annual Meeting, the election of Dale Fuller as the new chairman of the Phoenix Technologies Board.

     7. John Mutch hereby consents to be named as a Nominee.

2


 

     8. The Company shall convene the Annual Meeting on February 14, 2007 at 10:00 a.m. local time and immediately adjourn the Annual Meeting, prior to the opening of the polls, to another date and time as promptly as possible following February 14, 2007 to allow additional time for the Company stockholders to receive the amended proxy materials contemplated by Section 2 of this Agreement.

     9. For a period commencing with the date of this Agreement and ending on the earlier to occur of (i) December 6, 2007 or (ii) in the event the Company’s 2008 annual meeting is held before February 9, 2008 (in which case, the Company shall either make a public announcement of the 2008 annual meeting date at least 70 days before the 2008 annual meeting or give the Ramius Group written notice of the 2008 annual meeting date at least 70 days before the 2008 annual meeting), then the date that is 70 days before the date of the 2008 annual stockholder meeting (the “Standstill Period”), neither the Ramius Group nor any of its controlled affiliates shall, without the prior written consent of the Phoenix Technologies Board, specifically expressed in a written resolution adopted by a majority vote of the entire Phoenix Technologies Board:

          (a) acquire or agree to acquire, or publicly offer or propose to acquire, directly or indirectly, by purchase or otherwise, any voting securities or direct or indirect rights or options to acquire any voting securities of the Company or any subsidiary thereof, or of any successor to or person in control of Company, or any assets of the Company or any subsidiary or division thereof or of any such successor or controlling person in excess of the Standstill Limit; provided, however, that nothing herein shall limit the ability of the Ramius Group to transfer any voting securities or direct or indirect rights or options to acquire any voting securities of the Company to any of its controlled affiliates, so long as such any such controlled affiliates agree to be bound by the terms of this Agreement and execute a joinder agreement to this Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B;

          (b) other than as provided in this Agreement, seek or propose to influence or control the management or the policies of the Company or to obtain representation on the Company’s board of directors, or solicit, or encourage or in any way participate in the solicitation of, any proxies or consents with respect to any voting securities of the Company; provided that nothing herein shall limit the ability of the Ramius Group to vote its voting securities on any matter submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the Company;

          (c) make any public announcement with respect to, or publicly offer to effect, seek or propose (with or without conditions) a merger, consolidation, business combination or other extraordinary transaction with or involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries or any of its or their securities or assets in excess of the Standstill Limit; provided, however, that nothing herein shall limit the ability of the Ramius Group to issue any communication contemplated by Rule 14a-1(l)(2)(iv) stating how they intend to vote and the reasons therefor with respect to any extraordinary transaction of any kind or nature between the Company and any third party unaffiliated with the Ramius Group; provided further, that nothing contained herein shall limit the ability of the Ramius Group to file an amendment or amendments to its Schedule 13D regarding the Common Stock of the

3


 

Company as required by law or to make other filings as required by law so long as the Ramius Group does not enter into any contract, arrangement, understanding or relationship (legal or otherwise) with respect to the Company’s voting securities in violation of clauses (a)-(e) of Section 9 hereof;

          (d) (i) form, join or in any way participate in a “group” as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (for the avoidance of doubt, including, without limitation, a group containing members of the Ramius Group and members of the AWM Group), other than a “group” that includes all or some lesser number of persons identified as members of the Ramius Group, but does not include any other members who are not currently identified as members of the Ramius Group, or (ii) enter into any negotiations, arrangements or understandings with any third parties, other than members of the Ramius Group solely with respect to the existing members of the Ramius Group, in connection with any of the foregoing; or

          (e) publicly seek or request permission to do any of the foregoing, request to amend or waive any provision of this paragraph (including, without limitation, any of clauses (a)-(d) hereof), or make or seek permission to make any public announcement with respect to any of the foregoing.

     “Standstill Limit” shall mean that number of Common Shares, the Beneficial Ownership of which would qualify a person or a group of affiliated or associated persons as an “Acquiring Person” under that certain Preferred Share Rights Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1999, between the Company and BankBoston, N.A. (the “Preferred Share Rights Agreement”), including any amendments thereto, other than any exception approved by the Phoenix Technologies Board to the definition of “Acquiring Person” under the Preferred Share Rights Agreement allowing a person or a “group” to purchase newly issued shares of the Company’s voting securities directly from the Company. For purposes of this Agreement, “Beneficial Ownership” and “Common Shares” shall have the meaning given to them in the Preferred Share Rights Agreement.

     10. Following the Annual Meeting and prior to the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, the Company agrees to review and consider, and to deliberate upon, at a meeting of the Phoenix Technologies Board, the corporate governance recommendations of Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), including the Company’s ISS Corporate Governance Quotient (the “CGQ”) and factors of the CGQ which I


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more