Back to top

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Settlement Agreement

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE | Document Parties: Material Technologies, Inc You are currently viewing:
This Settlement Agreement involves

Material Technologies, Inc

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
Date: 1/3/2007
Industry: Misc. Capital Goods     Sector: Capital Goods

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE, Parties: material technologies  inc
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day




Exhibit 10.1

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

          This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (herein the “Agreement”) is made as of December 27, 2006 (herein “Date of Execution”) by and between Stephen Forrest Beck (herein “Beck”), an individual with offices at 489 Pimiento Lane, Santa Barbara, CA 93108, on the one hand, and Material Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation with offices at 11661 San Vicente Boulevard, Suite 707, Los Angeles, CA 90049 (herein “Matech” or the “Company”) and Robert M. Bernstein, an individual with the same offices as Matech (herein “Bernstein”, and together with Matech, the “Respondents”).

          This Agreement is made for the purpose of finally and completely settling all claims by, among and between Beck and Respondents, as more fully specified and described below. 

I.
RECITALS

           Whereas, On April 30, 2001, Beck filed a lawsuit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Respondents, in a case entitled Stephen Forrest Beck v. Robert M. Bernstein, Material Technologies, Inc., et al. , Civil No. BC 249547, seeking damages for breach of contract, among other things.  On that same date, Matech filed a lawsuit in the Los Angeles County Superior Court against Plaintiff, in a case entitled Material Technologies v. Stephen Forrest Beck , Civil No. BC249495, demanding the return of 244,427 shares of Matech Common Stock.  The actions were thereafter consolidated.

           Whereas , on July 15, 2002, the parties entered into a settlement agreement (herein the “July Agreement”) to resolve the civil actions filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles, case numbers BC249495 and BC249547;

           Whereas, under the terms of the July Agreement, and in consideration for Beck executing and filing a Substitution of Attorney form and a Request for Dismissal, Respondents agreed to issue Beck one million shares of Matech Class A Common Stock subject to SEC Rule 144 limitations providing that such shares were not tradable for a period of one year from the date of issuance;


1






           Whereas the one million shares of Matech Class A Common Stock were thereafter to be freely tradable on NASDAQ by Beck with the limitation that Beck not trade more than 10% of the volume of Matech shares publicly traded the previous month, which amount was to be reduced by 50% in the event that double reporting of trades occurred in the previous month;

           Whereas the percentage of Beck’s one million shares in Matech to the total number of outstanding shares on the date of issuance, i.e. 1.78% on July 15, 2002, was not to be diluted for a period of eighteen (18) months thereafter by the issuance of any other Matech shares, options or warrants with no exceptions;

           Whereas if Respondents were to issue additional shares during the eighteen-month period, it must simultaneously issue a sufficient number of shares to Beck such that his percent ownership in Matech as of the date of issuance of the additional shares remained unchanged;

           Whereas any subsequently issued shares to Beck would be subject to the same SEC Rule 144 limitations as the original one million shares;

           Whereas Matech was to establish an escrow account which would contain 2,000,000 shares of stock with an irrevocable letter of instructions in furtherance of the anti-dilution provision;

           Whereas if a dispute arose regarding the settlement agreement, the prevailing party would be entitled to attorney’s fees;

           Whereas , on December 20, 2002, the parties entered into a further agreement whereby Beck was to introduce sources of capital to Respondents (herein the “December Agreement”); and in return for said promise was to receive an initial 500,000 shares of Matech Common Shares, increasing Beck’s non-dilutable percentage ownership of shares to 2.67 percent; 

           Whereas the December Agreement also provided that the current anti-dilution provision on the shares held by Beck would be extended to July 30, 2006, and that a letter to that effect would be sent to the transfer agent;

           Whereas Beck did introduce sources of potential capital to Respondents;

           Whereas, on September 23, 2003, Respondents reverse split Matech’s shares outstanding 1000 to 1 and subsequently issued approximately 73 million new shares;

           Whereas Respondents did not subsequently issue Beck the 2.67 percent of the 73 million shares, or 1,949,100 shares that were due to him;


2






           Whereas as of January 31, 2006, and subsequent to the September issuance of shares, Respondents have issued approximately 145,911,233 additional shares, of which Beck was entitled to 2.67 percent, or 3,895,829 shares;

           Whereas Respondents have not issued Beck anti-dilution shares under the terms of the July and December agreements as to the additional 2.67 percent of the 145,911,233 shares, or 3,895,829 shares;

           Whereas Beck is now owed 5,824,929 shares from the September 2003 reverse split and the additional shares issued between September 2003 and January 31, 2006;

           Whereas Respondents reverse split the shares 1-for 300 as part of a recapitalization again in October 2006, issuing up to 71 million shares;

           Whereas Beck brought a complaint before the Los Angeles Superior Court, in a matter entitled Beck v. Material Technologies, Inc., Bernstein , Case No. SC088898, and that matter is currently pending in the West District of Los Angeles.

           Whereas , without admitting liability, the parties desire to avoid litigation and mutually settle the dispute on the terms set forth below;

           Whereas Beck and Respondents, and each of them, have engaged in extensive good faith negotiations in an effort to settle the dispute between them for all possible causes of action relating to the above sequence of events, and have agreed to resolve all said causes of action against one another;

           Whereas , in consideration of the waiver and release of the right to seek a judicial determination of liability for any and all causes of action that each party may have against the other that is the subject of the above sequence of events; and for other good and valuable consideration not herein recited, Beck and Respondents hereby agree as follows:

II
TERMS OF AGREEMENT  AND MUTUAL GENERAL RELEASE

     Section 1      Based upon the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference and form a material part of this Agreement, and upon the mutual covenants and conditions contained in this Agreement and upon all conditions precedent being satisfied, the following shall occur:

3






          (i)         The parties, and each of them, shall execute and carry out the terms of this Agreement.

          (ii)         Anti-Dilution Shares : Matech shall, no later than five (5) days after the date this agreement is executed, establish an Anti-Dilution Escrow account as described in the Irrevocable Escrow Instructions with Interwest Transfer contained in Exhibit A and deposit into it 5 million shares issued to Beck as of the date of this Settlement Agreement (the “Anti-Dilution Shares”), of which no less than 1,895,000 Matech shares, or 2.67% of the 71 million shares Matech currently has authority to issue under the recapitalization, which represent shares earned by Beck in the July Agreement and the December Agreement, shall be immediately tradable.  If Beck receives an amount greater than $800,000 from the sale of 1,263,800 of such shares (1.78% of 71 million), then the remaining Anti-Dilution Shares shall be returned to the Company.

                     (a)       Company’s counsel shall provide an opinion that the sale of the 1,895,000 of such shares conforms to the requirements for the public resale of shares under SEC Rule 144.

           (iii)       Downside Protection Guarantee : Matech guarantees that Beck will receive not  less than $800,000 (gross amount, not taking into consideration selling expenses including commissions) from the sale of Anti-Dilution Shares.

                     (a)       Should Beck sell all of the shares issued to him in (ii) above and not receive total proceeds of $800,000, then an additional number of shares (“Additional Anti-Dilution Shares”) shall be released to Beck from the Anti-Dilution Escrow described in (iv) below. The number of such shares shall be calculated by subtracting the total amount received by Beck from the sale of such Anti-Dilution Shares from $800,000 and dividing that amount by the share price on the date on which Beck sold his last Anti-Dilution share.  If the proceeds from the sale of such Additional Anti-Dilution Shares are not sufficient to bring the amount received by Beck from the sale of Anti-Dilution Shares to $800,000, then the same procedure shall be followed until Beck receives that amount. 

                     (b)       In the event that Beck receives $800,000 from the sale of Anti-Dilution Shares prior to selling the full number of any Additional Anti Dilution Shares released to him from the escrow, then he shall return to the escrow the remaining Additional Anti-Dilution Shares once he has received $800,000.

                     (c)       Beck’s counsel may provide an opinion that the sale of Additional Anti-Dilution Shares conforms to the requirements for the public resale of shares under SEC Rule 144.  The


4






Company shall provide such documents as reasonably necessary to support such opinion.  The Company agrees to review and reasonably honor such a Rule 144 opinion letter.

           (iv)       Anti-Dilution Escrow:   The Company will add shares in the name of Beck to the escrow to maintain 5,000,000 shares in such account at all times.  The Company will pay the cost of the escrow.  

           (v)      Upside Shares:”   Beck will have anti-dilution protection for 21 months from the date of the execution of this Agreement. 

                     a)       During this period, in each quarter that Matech issues shares for any reason (except the issuance of shares to Beck pursuant to this agreement), it will issue Beck 1.78% of the number of such shares as of the same date such shares were issued and the shares shall be released to Beck from escrow at the end of each quarter in which Matech issues shares to any third party.

                     b)       The Upside Shares shall also include 1.78% of all shares issued under the recapitalization of the Company as described in the Company’s 8K Filing of October 27, 2006 or any other recapitalization of the Company that may occur. 

                     c)       The shares described in this paragraph shall be held in the Upside Shares Escrow until the earlier of the time when Beck has received the full $800,000 from the sale of shares from the Anti-Dilution Escrow described in Section (ii), or on the expiration of one year from the execution date of this agreement.  At that time, the shares in this account will be made available to Beck, will be subject to the Trading Limitations set forth in subsection (vi), and will be released to Beck in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.  Proceeds from the sale of the shares in this paragraph shall not count against the $800,000 guarantee in (iii) above.

                     d)       Respondents will establish an “Upside Shares Escrow” by issuing 5,000,000 shares to Beck within five (5) days of the date of this Settlement Agreement and depositing such shares in the “Upside Shares Escrow” account.  The Company will add shares in the name of Beck to the escrow to maintain 5,000,000 shares in such account at all times.  The Company will pay the cost of the escrow. 

                     e)       The shares issued pursuant to this Section 1(v) will be “restricted securities” under the Securities Act of 1933, will contain an appropriate restrictive legend, and will not be saleable for at least one (1) year from the date Beck is entitled to receive them.


5






           (vi)       Trading Limitations :

                     a)       Beck will limit the number of shares traded to a non-cumulative monthly amount equal to no more than 8% of the prior month’s volume of Matech shares as determined by Fidelity.com., and will further limit the number of shares traded on any given day to 1/20 th of  that amount.  The number of shares derived from the above calculations shall be rounded up to the nearest 10 shares and that shall be the trading limit. Rounding will be adjusted in the event the trading volume increases in a proportionate amount as follows:  if the monthly trading volume is at least 1 million shares for any given month, then rounding shall increase to 100 shares; if the monthly trading volume increases to 10 million shares for any given month, then rounding shall increase to 1,000 shares, and so forth.  This limitation on trading shall apply to both Anti-Dilution and Upside Shares (after they are released from escrow).  However, should the escrow holder fail to supply Beck with the tradable shares prior to the third trading day of the month due to their resignation or for any other reason, then the trading volume will be raised to account for that delay.  The trading month for purposes of this paragraph shall be from the third trading day of each month through the second trading day of the following month.  Example 1: If InterWest is five days late in a given month, then the volume for the remaining days of the month will be 8% of the prior months volume divided by 15 rather than 20 (20-5=15).  Example 2:  If Interwest is two months late, then the limit in the third month would be 8% of month one + 8% of


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more