Exhibit 10.1
EXECUTION VERSION
PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT
MATERIALS — SUBJECT TO
DELAWARE UNIFORM RULE OF
EVIDENCE 408 — NOT TO BE USED OR
DISCLOSED FOR ANY PURPOSE
OTHER THAN SETTLEMENT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
MUTUAL RELEASE
This Settlement Agreement and Mutual
Release (this “ Agreement ”) is entered into as
of October 18, 2009, by and among Sprint Nextel Corporation
(f/k/a Sprint Corporation), a Kansas corporation, WirelessCo L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership, Sprint Spectrum L.P., a Delaware
limited partnership, SprintCom, Inc., a Kansas corporation,
Sprint Communications Company, L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership, Nextel Communications, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, PhillieCo L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and
APC PCS LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively,
the “ Sprint Parties ”), Horizon Personal
Communications, Inc., an Ohio corporation, Bright Personal
Communications Services, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company,
iPCS Wireless, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
iPCS, Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively, the “
iPCS Parties ” and together with the Sprint Parties,
the “ Parties ”).
Whereas , on July 15, 2005, iPCS
Wireless, Inc. initiated a lawsuit against certain of the
Sprint Parties asserting, among other things, breach of contract
and seeking numerous remedies, which is currently pending in the
Circuit Court of Cook County, Chancery Division (the “
Circuit Court ”) and is styled iPCS
Wireless, Inc. v. Sprint Corporation, WirelessCo L.P.,
Sprint Spectrum L.P., SprintCom, Inc. and Sprint
Communications Company, L.P. , Case No. 05 CH 11792 (the
“ Circuit Court Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation
”), and on September 22, 2008, certain of the Sprint
Parties filed a petition for relief from judgment in the Circuit
Court Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation under Section 2-1401 of
the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, which is currently pending in
the Illinois Appellate Court, Case No. 09-0424 (the “
Section 2-1401 Appeal ” and together with the
Circuit Court Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation, the “
Illinois Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation ”); and on
July 22, 2005, Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. and
Bright Personal Communications Services, LLC initiated a lawsuit
against the Sprint Parties asserting, among other things, breach of
contract and seeking numerous remedies, which is currently pending
in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “ Delaware Chancery
Court ”) and is styled Horizon Personal
Communications, Inc. and Bright Personal Communications
Services, LLC v. Sprint Corporation, WirelessCo L.P., Sprint
Spectrum L.P., SprintCom, Inc., Sprint Communications Company,
L.P., Nextel Communications, Inc., PhillieCo L.P. and APC PCS
LLC, C.A. No. 1518-N (together with the Illinois
Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation, the “ Sprint/Nextel
Merger Litigation ”);
Whereas , on May 7, 2008, certain of the Sprint
Parties initiated a lawsuit against the iPCS Parties seeking a
declaratory judgment, which was pending in the Delaware Chancery
Court, is currently stayed, and is styled Sprint Nextel
Corporation, WirelessCo L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P.,
SprintCom, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. v.
iPCS, Inc., iPCS Wireless, Inc., Horizon Personal
Communications, Inc. and Bright Personal
Communications
Services, LLC , C.A. No. 3746-VCP (the “
Delaware Chancery Court Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation ”); and on May 12, 2008, certain of the
iPCS Parties initiated a lawsuit against certain of the Sprint
Parties seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, which is
currently pending in the Circuit Court and is styled iPCS
Wireless, Inc., Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. and
Bright Personal Communications Services, LLC v. Sprint Nextel
Corporation, WirelessCo L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P.,
SprintCom, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. ,
Case No. 08 CH 17214 (the “ Circuit Court
Sprint/Clearwire Transaction Litigation ” and together
with the Delaware Chancery Court Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation, the “ Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation ”);
Whereas , on September 10, 2009, certain of the
iPCS Parties initiated a lawsuit against certain of the Sprint
Parties seeking an injunction, which is currently pending in the
Circuit Court and is styled iPCS Wireless, Inc., Horizon
Personal Communications, Inc. and Bright Personal
Communications Services, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation,
WirelessCo L.P., Sprint Spectrum L.P., SprintCom, Inc. and
Sprint Communications Company, L.P. , Case No. 09 CH 32574
(the “ Sprint/Virgin Transaction Litigation ”);
and
Whereas , on the terms and subject to the conditions
contained herein, the Parties wish to compromise and settle all
disputes between them, including but not limited to the claims
asserted in the Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation, the
Sprint/Clearwire Transaction Litigation and the Sprint/Virgin
Transaction Litigation (collectively, the “ Litigation
”).
Now, therefore
, in consideration of the mutual
covenants and promises set forth herein, and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound,
hereby agree as follows:
1.
Agreement and Plan of
Merger. The
Parties are executing and delivering this Agreement
contemporaneously with the execution and delivery by
iPCS, Inc. and Sprint Nextel Corporation of an Agreement and
Plan of Merger (the “ Merger Agreement ”), in
the form attached as Exhibit A to this
Agreement.
2.
Effectiveness of
Provisions. This
Section 2 and Sections 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of this
Agreement shall be effective from and after the date of this
Agreement (the “ Signing Date ”); provided that
Sections 6(a), 6(b), 7 and 9 of this Agreement shall terminate
(i) if the Merger Agreement is terminated for any reason or
(ii) upon written notice by the Sprint Parties or the iPCS
Parties to the other if the Offer (as defined in the Merger
Agreement) has not closed by the Outside Date (as defined in the
Merger Agreement) and the Party providing the notice is unable to
terminate the Merger Agreement because a judgment, order,
injunction, decree, stipulation or award precludes the termination
of the Merger Agreement (each, a “ Termination Event
”). Section 3 of this Agreement shall only become
binding and effective at the time of the closing of the Merger (as
defined in the Merger Agreement) (the “ Effectiveness
Time ”).
3.
General Releases.
(a)
Sprint Release of the iPCS
Parties. As of
the Effectiveness Time, except for any claims arising under or
relating to a breach of this Agreement, the Merger Agreement and/or
the agreements and transactions contemplated hereby and thereby,
each of the Sprint Parties and their respective officers,
directors, shareholders, partners, members, affiliates,
subsidiaries, employees, agents, attorneys and representatives
release and forever discharge the iPCS Parties and their respective
officers, directors, shareholders, partners, members, affiliates,
subsidiaries, employees, agents, attorneys and representatives
(collectively, the “ iPCS Released Parties ”)
from all liabilities, claims, attorney’s fees, damages,
injuries, causes of action, and losses of any kind (including,
without limitation, any claims for equitable or injunctive relief)
that any of the Sprint Parties ever had, now has, has asserted,
could have asserted or may assert in the future against any of the
iPCS Released Parties that exist or may exist as of the
Effectiveness Time, including but not limited to all claims that
have been or could have been asserted in the Litigation
(collectively, “ Sprint’s Claims
”).
(b)
iPCS Release of the Sprint
Parties. As of
the Effectiveness Time, except for any claims arising under or
relating to a breach of this Agreement, the Merger Agreement and/or
the agreements and transactions contemplated hereby and thereby,
each of the iPCS Parties and their respective officers, directors,
shareholders, partners, members, affiliates, subsidiaries,
employees, agents, attorneys and representatives release and
forever discharge the Sprint Parties and their respective officers,
directors, shareholders, partners, members, affiliates,
subsidiaries, employees, agents, attorneys and representatives
(collectively, the “ Sprint Released Parties ”)
from all liabilities, claims, attorney’s fees, damages,
injuries, causes of action, and losses of any kind (including,
without limitation, any claims for equitable or injunctive relief)
that any of the iPCS Parties ever had, now has, has asserted, could
have asserted or may assert in the future against any of the Sprint
Released Parties that exist or may exist as of the Effectiveness
Time, including but not limited to all claims that have been or
could have been asserted in the Litigation (collectively, “
iPCS’s Claims ”).
(c)
iPCS Release of iPCS Directors
and Officers . As of the Effectiveness Time, each of the iPCS
Parties and each of their respective subsidiaries releases and
forever discharges each of the iPCS Parties’ respective
(i) officers, directors and employees (in any and all
capacities relating to the iPCS Parties, including, without
limitation, as shareholders and affiliates of the iPCS Parties)
(collectively, the “ iPCS Released Insiders ”)
from all liabilities, claims, attorney’s fees, damages,
injuries, causes of action, and losses of any kind (including,
without limitation, any claims for equitable or injunctive relief)
that any of the iPCS Parties ever had, now has, has asserted, could
have asserted or may assert in the future against any of the iPCS
Released Insiders that exist or may exist as of the Effectiveness
Time, including but not limited to all claims that have been or
could have been asserted in or relating to the Litigation
(collectively, “ iPCS’s Insider Claims ”),
other than claims arising from acts or omissions that constitute
(1) fraud, (2) breach of fiduciary duty (other than with
respect to the Litigation and any actions or omissions taken or not
taken in connection with the Litigation), (3) a violation of
law, (4) an attempt to recover amounts paid to any iPCS
Released Insider, the payment of which constitutes a breach by
iPCS, Inc. of the Merger Agreement or (5) any willful and
material violation of any written employment or other written
policy of iPCS, Inc. and (ii) attorneys and
representatives (collectively, the “
iPCS Released Outsiders ”) from all liabilities,
claims, attorney’s fees, damages, injuries, causes of action,
and losses of any kind (including, without limitation, any claims
for equitable or injunctive relief) that any of the iPCS Parties
ever had, now has, has asserted, could have asserted or may assert
in the future against any of the iPCS Released Outsiders that exist
or may exist as of the Effectiveness Time, in each case solely with
respect to or involving the Litigation and any actions or omissions
taken or not taken in connection with the Litigation (together with
Sprint’s Claims, iPCS’s Claims and iPCS’s Insider
Claims, the “ Released Claims ”). The
Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that none of the exceptions to
the releases set forth in this Section 3(c) shall create
or be deemed to create a claim or cause of action against any iPCS
Released Insider or any iPCS Released Outsider that would not
otherwise exist under applicable law.
(d)
Complete
Release.
Effective as of the Effectiveness Time, this Agreement constitutes
the complete compromise, settlement, accord and satisfaction of all
of the Released Claims.
(e)
Dismissal of
Litigation. As
soon as practicable after the Effectiveness Time, the Parties will
jointly execute, deliver and file with the Delaware Chancery Court,
the Circuit Court and the Illinois Appellate Court such documents
as may be necessary or desirable to effect the dismissal with
prejudice of the Litigation.
(f)
Dissolution of
Injunction. Upon the Effectiveness Time, the Parties will
submit jointly to the Circuit Court an Agreed Motion to Vacate the
Court’s Order entered on January 30, 2009 (the “
Injunction Order ”) and will request that the Circuit
Court issue an order vacating the Injunction Order.
Additionally, upon the Effectiveness Time, the Sprint Parties will
dismiss with prejudice the Section 2-1401 Appeal.
4.
Expenses. The Parties will pay their own expenses
and attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the
Litigation and with the negotiation and execution of this
Agreement.
5.
Stays of
Litigation.
(a)
Illinois Sprint/Nextel Merger
Litigation . On the Signing Date, or on the next
business day thereafter if the Signing Date is not a business day,
the Parties shall file with (i) the Circuit Court an Agreed
Motion to Stay, in the form attached as Exhibit B to
this Agreement (the “ Sprint/Nextel Motion ”),
and an Agreed Order, in the form attached as Exhibit C
to this Agreement (the “ Sprint/Nextel Stay ”),
with respect to the Illinois Sprint/Nextel Merger Litigation and
(ii) the Illinois Appellate Court an Agreed Motion to Stay, in
the form attached as Exhibit D to this Agreement (the
“ 2-1401 Motion ”), and an Agreed Order, in the
form attached as Exhibit D to this Agreement (the
“ 2-1401 Stay ”), with respect to the 2-1401
Appeal. The Parties shall take all steps necessary as soon as
practicable (i) to cause the Circuit Court to hear the
Sprint/Nextel Motion and to issue the Sprint/Nextel Stay, as the
same may be modified in the Circuit Court’s discretion, and
(ii) to present the 2-1401 Motion to the Illinois Appellate
Court and to cause the Illinois Appellate Court to issue the 2-1401
Stay, as the same may be modified in the Illinois Appellate
Court’s discretion. The Parties hereby acknowledge and
agree that the Sprint/Nextel Stay shall not be deemed to impact any
rights, duties or obligations under that
certain Forbearance Agreement, dated as of
July 28, 2005, by and among certain affiliates of Sprint
Nextel Corporation and the iPCS Parties (the “ Nextel
Forbearance Agreement ”) and that the parties thereto
shall continue to be bound by and comply fully with the terms and
conditions thereof. If the Sprint/Nextel Stay is vacated for
any reason, the Sprint Parties shall have until 120 days after the
date on which the Sprint/Nextel Stay is vacated to comply with the
requirements of the Final Order and Judgment issued by the Circuit
Court on January 30, 2009 in the Circuit Court Sprint/Nextel
Merger Litigation.
(b)
Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation . On the Signing Date, or on the next
business day thereafter if the Signing Date is not a business day,
the Parties shall file with the Circuit Court an Agreed Motion to
Stay, in the form attached as Exhibit E to this
Agreement (the “ Sprint/Clearwire Motion ”), and
an Agreed Order, in the form attached as Exhibit F to
this Agreement (the “ Sprint/Clearwire Stay ”),
with respect to the Circuit Court Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation. The Parties shall take all steps necessary to
cause the Circuit Court to hear the Sprint/Clearwire Motion and to
issue the Sprint/Clearwire Stay, as the same may be modified in the
Circuit Court’s discretion, in each case as soon as
practicable. The Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that
the Sprint/Clearwire Stay shall not stay any rights, duties or
obligations under the Agreed Order and Stipulation issued by the
Circuit Court on November 17, 2008 in the Circuit Court
Sprint/Clearwire Transaction Litigation (the “
Sprint/Clearwire Order ”) and that the iPCS Parties
and the Sprint Parties that are bound thereby shall continue to be
bound by and comply fully with the terms and conditions of the
Sprint/Clearwire Order. In addition, notwithstanding anything
to the contrary contained in this Agreement, if Clearwire
Corporation takes any action that does not comply with the
Sprint/Clearwire Order or if Clearwire Corporation provides notice
to the iPCS Parties of its intention to launch a network or to
promote or sell products or services in any part of the applicable
iPCS Parties’ service areas, as set forth in the applicable
Sprint PCS Management Agreements, as amended or supplemented (the
“ Service Areas ”), pursuant to Paragraph 3 of
the Sprint/Clearwire Order, the Sprint/Clearwire Stay shall be
automatically vacated and the iPCS Parties shall be entitled to
pursue all available remedies.
(c)
Sprint/Virgin Transaction
Litigation . On the Signing Date, or on the next
business day thereafter if the Signing Date is not a business day,
the Parties shall file with the Circuit Court an Agreed Motion to
Stay, in the form attached as Exhibit G to this
Agreement (the “ Sprint/Virgin Motion ”), and an
Agreed Order, in the form attached as Exhibit H to this
Agreement (the “ Sprint/Virgin Stay ” and
together with the Sprint/Nextel Stay, the 2-1401 Stay and the
Sprint/Clearwire Stay, the “ Stays of Litigation
”), with respect to the Sprint/Virgin Transaction
Litigation. The Parties shall take all steps necessary to
cause the Circuit Court to hear the Sprint/Virgin Motion and to
issue the Sprint/Virgin Stay, as the same may be modified in the
Circuit Court’s discretion, in each case as soon as
practicable. The Sprint Parties hereby unconditionally and
irrevocably covenant and agree that neither the Sprint Parties nor
any affiliate of the Sprint Parties shall (i) from and after
the Signing Date and through the earlier of (1) the occurrence
of a Termination Event and (2) the Effectiveness Time, reduce,
directly or indirectly, or shall permit to be reduced, the reseller
rates under the Virgin Mobile resale arrangement applicable to the
iPCS Parties and their affiliates under the applicable Sprint PCS
Management Agreements, as amended or supplemented as of the Signing
Date (the “ Reseller Rates ”), or
(ii) claim or assert in any litigation proceeding or other
action between the Sprint
Parties and the iPCS Parties or any of their
respective affiliates that the iPCS Parties or any of their
affiliates has waived the right to challenge the permissibility of
any prior direct or indirect reductions of the Reseller
Rates.
(d)
Continuance of
Stays .
Except as set forth in
Section 5(b) or as provided in the Stays of Litigation,
from and after the Signing Date and through the Effectiveness Time,
none of the Parties shall (i) seek to modify or vacate the
Stays of Litigation or the Delaware Sprint/Clearwire Stay (as
defined below) or (ii) take any other action inconsistent with
the continuation of the Stays of Litigation or the Delaware
Sprint/Clearwire Stay. Notwithstanding the foregoing
sentence, upon the occurrence of a Termination Event, the Stays of
Litigation shall be automatically vacated and the Parties shall be
entitled to seek to modify or vacate the Delaware Sprint/Clearwire
Stay. For purposes of this Agreement, “ Delaware
Sprint/Clearwire Stay ” shall mean the Order issued by
the Delaware Chancery Court on October 8, 2008 with respect to
the Delaware Chancery Court Sprint/Clearwire Transaction
Litigation.
(e)
Compliance With
Stays. The
Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the obligations imposed
by each of the Stays of Litigation are valid and enforceable
obligations of this Agreement, and that a breach of any such
obligation shall constitute a breach of this Agreement.
6.
Covenant Not To Sue or To Assist
Third Parties.
(a)
Covenant by iPCS
Parties . From and after the Signing Date, so long
as this Section 6(a) remains in effect in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement, except (i) for any claims arising
under or relating to a breach of this Agreement, the Merger
Agreement and/or the agreements and transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby, and (ii) as set forth in
Section 5(b), no iPCS Party will (1) commence or in any
manner seek relief against any of the Sprint Parties through any
suit or proceeding, (2) become a party (unless such claims are
asserted against one or more of the iPCS Parties) to any suit or
proceeding arising from or in connection with an attempt by or on
behalf of any third party to enforce or collect an amount based on
any Released Claim (including, without limitation, any claim that
will become a Released Claim as of the Effectiveness Time), or
(3) assist in any manner any other third party in connection
with any threatened or existing litigation such party may have
against any Sprint Party; provided, however, that an iPCS Party may
comply with a subpoena if one is issued by a court of competent
jurisdiction. In addition, no iPCS Party will assist the
efforts of any third party attempting to enforce or collect an
amount based on a Released Claim (including, without limitation,
any claim that will become a Released Claim as of the Effectiveness
Time), unless required to do so by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(b)
Covenant by Sprint
Parties . From and after the Signing Date, so long
as this Section 6(b) remains in effect in accordance with
the terms of this Agreement, except for any claims arising under or
relating to a breach of this Agreement, the Merger Agreement and/or
the agreements and transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, no
Sprint Party will (i) commence or in any manner seek relief
against any of the iPCS Parties through any suit or proceeding,
(ii) become a party (unless such claims are asserted against
one or more of the Sprint Parties) to any suit or proceeding
arising from or in connection with an attempt by or on behalf of
any third
party to enforce or collect an amount based on
any Released Claim (including, without limitation, any claim that
will become a Released Claim as of the Effectiveness Time), or
(iii) assist in any manner any other third party in connection
with any threatened or existing litigation such party may have
against any iPCS Party; provided, however, that a Sprint Party may
comply with a subpoena if one is issued by a court of competent
jurisdiction. In addition, no Sprint Party will assist the
efforts of any third party attempting to enforce or collect an
amount based on a Released Claim (including, without limitation,
any claim that will become a Released Claim as of the Effectiveness
Time), unless required to do so by a court of competent
jurisdiction.
(c)
Preservation of
Claims . Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in this Agreement, (i) from and after the Signing
Date and through the earlier of (1) the occurrence of a
Termination Event and (2) the Effectiveness Time, the Parties
hereby acknowledge and agree that any and all rights of the Parties
and their respective affiliates with respect to any and all
unasserted claims or causes of action that the Parties and their
respective affiliates ever had, now have, could have asserted or
may have or may assert in the future against any of the other
P