Back to top

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE

Settlement Agreement

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE | Document Parties: WESTMORELAND COAL CO | Minerals Management | Western Energy Company You are currently viewing:
This Settlement Agreement involves

WESTMORELAND COAL CO | Minerals Management | Western Energy Company

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE
Date: 7/15/2009
Industry: Coal     Sector: Energy

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE, Parties: westmoreland coal co , minerals management , western energy company
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.1

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE

This Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release (Settlement Agreement) is made between Western Energy Company, (Western Energy), the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), and the United States Department of the Interior (DOI), through its agency the Minerals Management Service (MMS) (collectively “the Parties”).

RECITALS

A. Western Energy is the lessee of the Federal coal leases located in the Rosebud Mine in Montana listed in Exhibit A. The Rosebud Mine is a surface mining operation consisting of designated areas A, B, C, D, and E, with each designated area supplying coal to specific units of the adjacent Colstrip Power Plant (Colstrip Plant).

B. On July 10, 1981, Western Energy entered into a Coal Transportation Agreement (CTA) with the Colstrip Plant under which Western Energy agreed to design, construct, own, operate, and maintain a coal conveyor system for the transportation of coal to the Colstrip Plant. In the CTA, the Colstrip Owners agreed to pay Western Energy for transportation of the coal.

C. On September 23, 2002, The MMS, based on an audit conducted by the State of Montana (State), issued to Western Energy an Order to Report and Pay Additional Royalties (2002 Order). This Order to Pay directed Western Energy to pay additional royalties of $ 3,184,724.85 on coal produced and sold from the Rosebud Mine from the period from October 1, 1991, through December 31, 1995. MMS issued the Order because it determined that Western Energy had underpaid royalties because Western Energy incorrectly excluded payments it received under the CTA for transporting production from within the Rosebud Mine to the adjacent Colstrip Plant. Western Energy appealed the 2002 Order to the MMS Director in Docket No. MMS-02-0092-COAL.

D. On January 27, 2003, MMS, based on an audit conducted by the State, issued a second Order to Report and Pay Additional Royalties (2003 Order), directing Western Energy to pay additional royalties of $ 3,830,043.50 on coal produced and sold from the Rosebud Mine for the period from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 2001 for the same reasons as the 2002 Order. Western Energy appealed the 2003 Order to the MMS Director in Docket No. MMS-03-0022-COAL.

E. On March 28, 2005, the Associate Director, Policy and Management Improvement, MMS, denied Western Energy’s appeals in MMS-02-0092-COAL and MMS-03-0022-COAL on substantive grounds, but rescinded the 2002 Order to the extent it directed the payment of royalty accruing more than 7 years before the date of the 2002 Order (Associate Director’s Decision). The Associate Director’s Decision rescinded the portion of the 2002 Order applying to royalties accruing more than 7 years before the date of the 2002 Order based upon the then-MMS Director’s October 8, 2002, written policy directing MMS to grant lessees’ appeals for any period more than 7 years prior to the date of the order (7-Year Policy). In Chiang v. Kempthorne, No. 1:04CV00199, slip op. (D.D.C. Aug. 30, 2007), the court disagreed with the government and held that the 7-Year Policy was arbitrary and capricious and vacated and remanded the 7-Year Policy to MMS. On November 17, 2007, the current MMS Director rescinded the 7-Year Policy. Western Energy appealed the Associate Director’s Decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA). The IBLA upheld the Associate Director’s Decision on all grounds in Western Energy Company, 172 IBLA 258 (2007) (IBLA Decision).

 

5


 

Exhibit 10.1

F. Western Energy sought judicial review of the IBLA Decision in Western Energy Company v. Kempthorne, No. 1:07-cv-2237 (RCL) (D.D.C.) (Litigation).

G. On September 26, 2006, MMS, based on an audit conducted by the State, issued a third Order to Report and Pay Additional Royalties (2006 Order), directing Western Energy to pay additional royalties of $1,569,146.81 on coal produced and sold from the Rosebud Mine for the period from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2004, for the same reasons as the 2002 Order. Western Energy appealed the 2006 Order to the MMS Director in Docket No. MMS-06-0056-COAL. On March 26, 2008, the Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management issued a decision in MMS-06-0056-COAL affirming the 2006 Order in all respects (ASLM Decision). Subsequently, the ASLM Decision was added to the Litigation.

H. On September 25, 2008, MMS, based on an audit conducted by the State, issued a fourth Order, however because the issue in this order was the same as identified in the prior 3 Orders, MMS issued an Order to Perform Restructured Accounting and Pay Additional Royalties (2008 Order). The 2008 Order directed Western Energy to pay additional royalties of $ 1,363,274.88 on coal produced and sold from the Rosebud Mine for the period from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2007, and to recalculate and pay additional royalties for the period January 2008 through August 2008. Western Energy appealed the 2008 Order to the MMS Director in Docket No. MMS-08-0194-COAL.

I. Collectively the 2002 Order, 2003 Order, 2006 Order, and 2008 Order are herein referred to as “the Orders.”

J. In addition to the time periods covered by the Orders, the Parties desire to resolve the issues in the Orders for the additional period from January 1, 1983, through September 30, 1991. Collectively the period from January 1, 1983, through December 31, 2007 is the “Settlement Period.”

K. The Parties also desire to reach an agreement on the transportation allowance deductions to be used by Western Energy in reporting and paying MMS royalties attributable to the transportation of Western Energy’s Coal to the Colstrip Plant after the Settlement Period.

AGREEMENT

THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set forth herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties to this Settlement Agreement hereby incorporate by reference and agree to the accuracy of the above recitals and further agree as follows:

1.  Payment : Western Energy will pay MMS $12,239,538.22 w


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more