Back to top

EX-10.1 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Settlement Agreement

EX-10.1 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT | Document Parties: MESA OFFSHORE TRUST | Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A You are currently viewing:
This Settlement Agreement involves

MESA OFFSHORE TRUST | Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc | JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: EX-10.1 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Date: 1/31/2007

EX-10.1 MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, Parties: mesa offshore trust , pioneer natural resources usa  inc , jpmorgan chase bank  n.a
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.1

MUTUAL RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

The parties to this Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement (this Agreement ) are Pioneer Natural Resources Company and Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (“PNR”) (collectively “Pioneer”); and the Mesa Offshore Trust (the “Mesa Trust”), acting by and through JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as trustee of the Mesa Trust (the Trustee ”) .  Pioneer, the Mesa Trust,  and the Trustee are collectively referred to as the Parties.

WHEREAS, the Mesa Trust  was created in 1982, pursuant to that certain Royalty Trust Indenture dated December 1, 1982 (the “Trust Indenture”), to hold an interest in the Mesa Offshore Royalty Partnership (the “Mesa Partnership ), to discharge liabilities incurred in the operation of the Mesa Trust, and to distribute remaining amounts to the beneficiaries of the Mesa Trust.

WHEREAS, the Mesa Partnership is a Texas general partnership created in 1982, pursuant to Articles of General Partnership dated November 30, 1982 (as amended by First Amended and Restated Articles of General Partnership dated December 1, 1982 and Amendment to First Amended and Restated Articles of General Partnership dated December 27, 1985) (the “Partnership Agreement”), to receive and hold certain overriding royalty interests (the “Overriding Royalty Interest”), to discharge liabilities incurred in the operation of the Mesa Partnership, and to distribute remaining amounts to the partners of the Mesa Partnership.  The Mesa Trust owns 99.99% of the Mesa Partnership.

WHEREAS, PNR is the sole managing general partner of the Mesa Partnership and also owns or operates leases that are burdened by the Overriding Royalty Interest owned by the Mesa Partnership.  PNR owns 0.01% of the Mesa Partnership.

WHEREAS, the Overriding Royalty Interest owned by the Mesa Partnership was transferred and conveyed to the Mesa Partnership under that certain Overriding Royalty Conveyance (the “Conveyance Agreement”), effective December 1, 1982.

WHEREAS, Pioneer Natural Resources Company is the parent company of PNR.

WHEREAS, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. serves as the trustee of the Mesa Trust and has executed this Agreement on behalf of the Mesa Trust.

WHEREAS, beneficial ownership of the Mesa Trust is divided among record and beneficial holders (the Beneficiaries”) of the 71,980,216 Units of Beneficial Interest in the Mesa Trust.

WHEREAS, on or about January 20, 2003, Woodside Energy (USA) Inc. (“Woodside”) and PNR entered into a Farmout Agreement under which PNR agreed to transfer to Woodside, subject to the terms and conditions of the referenced Farmout Agreement, all of PNR’s right, title, and interest to certain leasehold rights in Brazos Area Blocks A-7 and A-39, which rights were burdened by Overriding Royalty Interest owned by the Mesa Partnership under the Conveyance Agreement (the “Woodside Farmout Agreement”).

1

 



WHEREAS, pursuant to the Woodside Farmout Agreement, PNR transferred to Woodside certain rights to Brazos Area Block A-39 by that certain Partial Assignment of Operating Rights executed on or about April 7, 2005, reserving an overriding royalty interest of 10% of 8/8ths, proportionately reduced, which would increase to 12.5% of 8/8ths, proportionately reduced, after payout (the “Woodside Partial Assignment of Operating Rights”).

WHEREAS, Pioneer maintains that, under the terms of the Conveyance Agreement, the farmout to Woodside of rights to Brazos Block A-39 caused the interest to be transferred to Woodside free and clear of the Overriding Royalty Interest owned by the Mesa Partnership burdening Block A-39 and caused the Mesa Partnership Overriding Royalty Interest in Block A-39 to be extinguished, subject only to the Mesa Partnership’s right to share in the 10% (increasing after payout to 12.5%) overriding royalty interest retained by PNR in the Woodside Farmout Agreement and the Woodside Partial Assignment of Operating Rights.

WHEREAS, on April 11, 2005, MOSH Holding, L.P. ( MOSH”) sued the Parties to this Agreement and Woodside in the 250th District Court of Travis County, Texas (the Lawsuit ).  MOSH, a Beneficiary of the Mesa Trust, is a Texas limited partnership that claims to own approximately 10% of the units of the Mesa Trust.  The Lawsuit has been transferred and is now pending in the 334th District Court of Harris County, Texas (the Court”).

WHEREAS, on December 8, 2006, Dagger-Spine Hedgehog Corporation (“Dagger-Spine”) filed a petition to intervene in the Lawsuit alleging claims virtually identical to those alleged by MOSH.  Dagger-Spine is a Texas corporation that claims to own approximately 3.5% of the units of the Mesa Trust.

WHEREAS, MOSH and Dagger-Spine (“Plaintiffs”) allege claims against Pioneer in the Lawsuit for, among other things, (1) a wrongful farmout of Brazos A-39 by Pioneer, (2) a wrongful delay by Pioneer in producing Brazos A-39, (3) fraudulent accounting practices by Pioneer, (4) breach of fiduciary duty by Pioneer, (5) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty by Woodside, (6) misapplication of Mesa Trust property by Pioneer, (7) conspiracy to misapply fiduciary property by Woodside and Pioneer, (8) common law fraud by Pioneer, (9) gross negligence by Pioneer, and (10) breach of the Conveyance Agreement by Pioneer, such claims as more fully stated in MOSH’s First Amended Original Petition, Verified Application for Temporary Restraining Order, Temporary Injunction, Show Cause Order, Permanent Injunction, and Request for Disclosure (“MOSH’s Petition”) and in Dagger-Spine’s Petition in Intervention and Request for Disclosure (“Dagger-Spine’s Petition”) on file in the Lawsuit.

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs also allege claims against the Trustee in the Lawsuit for, among other things, (1) an accounting, (2) breaches of fiduciary duty, including the duty to refrain from self-dealing, duty of loyalty, and duty of full disclosure, (3) fraud, (4) gross negligence, and (5) partner (vicarious) liability, such claims as more fully stated in MOSH’s Petition and in Dagger-Spine’s Petition..

WHEREAS, through the Lawsuit, Plaintiffs seek various remedies from the Parties including, among other things, (a) reconstruing the Royalty Trust Indenture to prevent the Mesa Trust from terminating for failing to reach certain performance thresholds set forth in the Trust Indenture; (b) requiring the Trustee to pursue certain claims against Pioneer and Woodside, or to

2

 



allow Plaintiffs to pursue such claims on behalf of the Mesa Trust; (c) setting aside any farmouts by Pioneer in which there have been conveyances to an affiliate of Pioneer; (d) removing JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Trustee; (e) seeking return or forfeiture of compensation to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; (f) recovering monetary damages from Pioneer, Woodside, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.; and (g) pursuing exemplary damages.

WHEREAS, controversies exist whether Pioneer and Woodside are liable to the Mesa Trust as Plaintiffs allege.

WHEREAS, by reason of such controversies, the Parties have agreed to the following settlement and compromise of any and all claims that the Mesa Trust or the Mesa Partnership has or might have against Pioneer and Woodside, conditioned on approval by the Court as set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the Parties acknowledge, the Parties agree as follows, subject to approval by the Court as set forth herein.

ARTICLE I.
CONVEYANCES AND ADJUSTMENTS

1.1.          PNR shall assign and transfer to the Mesa Partnership, or shall cause to be assigned and transferred to the Mesa Partnership, the A-39B ORRI (as defined in Schedule 1.1).  The A-39B ORRI shall be in lieu of and shall replace and supersede any rights and interests that the Mesa Partnership and/or the Mesa Trust might otherwise own, claim or be entitled to in the A-39B Property (as defined in Schedule 1.1).  The assignment provided for in this Section 1.1 shall be effective as of first production from the A-39 No. 5 Well and shall be substantially in the form of the Assignment of Overriding Royalty Interest attached as Schedule 1.1 hereto.  On behalf of the Mesa Trust and the Mesa Partnership, the Trustee hereby agrees and consents to this assignment and transfer and to the related Amendment to the Conveyance Agreement attached as Schedule 1.1A hereto.

1.2.          Pioneer, the Mesa Trust and the Trustee acknowledge that as of October 31, 2006, PNR’s books and records reflected accrued but unsatisfied plugging, abandonment, and decommissioning costs incurred and projected to be incurred in the future allocable to the Overriding Royalty Interest held by the Mesa Partnership under the Conveyance Agreement of approximately $1.4 million (the “Prior P&A Costs”).  The Prior P&A Costs relate to facilities now or previously located on the areas designated as Brazos Block A-7A, Brazos Block A-7B, Brazos Block A-39A, Matagorda Block 624, and South Marsh Island Block 155 (the “P&A Properties”).  PNR represents that as of October 31, 2006, it had accrued no plugging, abandonment, or decommissioning costs allocable to the Overriding

3

 



Royalty Interest held by the Mesa Partnership under the Conveyance Agreement relating to any properties other than the P&A Properties.  PNR agrees to amend, and to cause the Mesa Partnership to amend, the Conveyance Agreement such that effective October 31, 2006, the Overriding Royalty Interest held by the Mesa Partnership shall not be subject to or liable for deductions for allocated accruals of the Prior P&A Costs relating to the P&A Properties.  Such amendment shall also provide that no plugging, abandonment or decommissioning costs shall be allocated to the Overriding Royalty Interest held by the Mesa Partnership, or be sought to be recovered from the Mesa Partnership, with respect to the Brazos A-39 No. 5 Well and facilities related to that well.  The amendment shall contain a statement to the effect that the Mesa Partnership’s interest under the Conveyance Agreement is unencumbered by and bears no share of or responsibility for additional plugging, abandonment, or decommissioning costs associated with activities occurring on or before October 31, 2006 with respect to any Lease (as defined in the Conveyance Agreement) or related facilities existing as of October 31, 2006 on or used in connection with any Lease.  This amendment shall be substantially in the form of Schedule 1.2.  On behalf of the Mesa Trust and the Mesa Partnership, the Trustee hereby agrees and consents to such amendment.

1.3.          Pioneer, the Mesa Trust, and the Trustee acknowledge that PNR has negotiated an agreement with a Non-Affiliate (as such term is defined in the Conveyance Agreement), Hydro Gulf of Mexico, L.L.C. (“Hydro”), pursuant to which PNR is to farmout and assign to Hydro operating rights in the NE/4 of the NE/4 of Brazos Block A-39 (the “Farmout Lands”) including the 50% undivided interest in such property currently burdened by the Overriding Royalty Interest under the Conveyance Agreement (the “Hydro Farmout Agreement”).  The Hydro Farmout Agreement currently provides—in summary—that if Hydro drills an earning well in the area designated by the parties as the Nimitz prospect (consisting of the Farmout Lands and certain acreage owned by Hydro in adjoining lease blocks, the “Hydro Nimitz Prospect”) and otherwise performs its obligations under the Hydro Farmout Agreement, then (i) PNR will assign to Hydro operating rights in the Farmout Lands, reserving a cost-free overriding royalty interest of 12.5% of 20% of 8/8ths production in the Farmout Lands, and (ii) Hydro will assign to PNR a like overriding royalty interest in the remainder of the Hydro Nimitz Prospect.  Conditioned on the absence of any material changes to the Hydro Farmout Agreement as currently executed, and subject to Hydro’s compliance with the terms of the Hydro Farmout Agreement and satisfaction of all requirements for Hydro to earn an assignment under the Hydro Farmout Agreement, PNR shall assign and transfer to, or cause to be assigned and transferred to, the Mesa Partnership an Overriding Royalty Interest (as such term is defined in the Conveyance Agreement) in 50% of the Retained Interest (as such term is defined in the Conveyance Agreement) reserved or otherwise acquired by PNR in the Hydro transaction.  Based on the commercial terms currently expressed in the Hydro Farmout Agreement and subject to Hydro’s compliance as stated above, PNR will assign and transfer to, or cause to be assigned and transferred to, the Mesa Partnership an interest equal to 90% of 50% of 20% of 12.5% of 8/8ths, or a 1.125% overriding royalty interest in the Hydro Nimitz Prospect, subject to the terms of the Conveyance Agreement and the Hydro Farmout Agreement.  A copy of the Hydro Farmout Agreement is attached as Schedule 1.3 hereto.  The Trustee acknowledges that Farmouts to Non-Affiliates of parts of the Subject Interests (as each of the foregoing capitalized terms are defined in the Conveyance Agreement) made in accordance with the Conveyance Agreement are permitted in PNR’s discretion and that such Farmouts allow assignment of a portion of the Subject Interests free and clear of the Overriding Royalty Interest provided that the  Royalty Owner receives an Overriding Royalty Interest in any Retained Interest reserved or acquired under such Farmout (as each of the foregoing capitalized terms are defined in the Conveyance Agreement).

1.4           Pioneer, the Mesa Trust, and the Trustee acknowledge that pursuant to Article 3.02 of the Trust Indenture the Trustee is directed to sell the Trust’s interest in the Mesa Partnership, or to cause the Partnership to sell the assets of the Partnership, if the total amount of

4

 



cash per year received by the Trust for each of three successive years after December 31, 1987 is less than 10 times one-third of the total amount payable to the Trustee for management of the Trust for such three-year period.  Based upon the audited books and records of the Trust, the amount of cash received by the Trust for each of the calendar years 2002, 2003 and 2004 was less than 10 times one-third of the total amount payable to the Trustee for management in such three-year period.  The Parties acknowledge that pursuant to Article 6.04 of the Partnership Agreement the managing general partner, at the direction of the Trustee, is required to use its best efforts to sell or otherwise dispose of, upon such terms as may be specified by the Trustee, the assets of the Partnership including the Overriding Royalty Interest.  The Parties further acknowledge that the Trustee must provide at least sixty (60) days written notice to MOSH concerning the Trustee’s causing or consenting to the sale of the Overriding Royalty Interest owned by the Mesa Partnership.  In accordance with the provisions of the Trust Indenture and the Partnership Agreement, and subject to the Court’s orders in the Lawsuit, the Trustee intends and directs, subject to the provisions of Article II below, as follows.

(a)           PNR, as managing general partner of the Mesa Partnership, shall use its best efforts to undertake the following steps to sell the assets of the Partnership on the timetable stated at section 1.4(b) below:

(i)            PNR shall arrange for the sale through The Oil and Gas Clearinghouse, or another similar third-party firm routinely engaged in conducting auctions of mineral interests.

(ii)           PNR shall provide to the auction firm non-confidential information commonly utilized in creating a data room such as a description of the assets to be sold and production and operational information relating to the properties that are currently the subject of the Overriding Royalty Interest.  The Trust shall provide to PNR non-confidential information in its possession concerning the properties that are currently the subject of the Overriding Royalty Interest as would commonly be provided to potential bidders in auction sales for inclusion in the data room.

(iii)          PNR shall cause the assets of the Partnership to be sold at public auction to the highest cash bidder.  Pioneer shall not bid on or purchase any of the Partnership’s assets.

(iv)          PNR shall promptly pay or make provision for the payment of any liabilities of the Partnership from and distribute the cash received in the sale of the Partnership’s assets in accordance with the Partners’ Sharing Ratios as provided in the Partnership Agreement.

(b)           PNR shall cause the sale to occur as soon as practicable, considering the required schedule of events imposed by the selected auction firm, after the first occurring of the dates specified below:

5

 



(i)            90 days following the logging and/or testing at objective depth of the well planned to be drilled to the Nimitz prospect described in section 1.2 above; or

(ii)           90 days following written notice to PNR from the Trustee to sell the assets of the Partnership.

(c)           In any event, however, the sale shall occur on, or as soon as practicable after, July 1, 2007.

(d)           Notice to the Beneficiaries of the Mesa Trust of this Agreement, provided in accordance with Section 2.1 below, shall constitute notice of sale as provided in Article 3.02 of the Trust Indenture; provided, however, that the Trustee shall issue an appropriate Form 8-K providing notice of the specific date selected for the sale and of the specific auction firm selected to conduct the sale at least 30 days prior to such sale.

(e)           PNR shall be reimbursed, pursuant to Article V of the Partnership Agreement, for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred, and for any fees and expenses to third parties, associated with the actions described in this Section 1.4.

(f)            The timetable provided for in 1.4(b) above may be subject to adjustment by Pioneer and/or the Trustee in the event of appeal of the Order provided for in Article II below subject, further, to the status of the bonding of such appeal.

ARTICLE II.
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT

2.1.          Court Approval .  This Agreement shall be expressly conditioned upon an Order by the Court approving of the Agreement, and this Agreement shall not be effective absent such an Order of the Court.  This Order shall include a determination by the Court (1) that the Agreement is in the best interests of the Mesa Trust and its Beneficiaries, and (2) that the Trustee has the capacity and authority to settle all claims on behalf of the Mesa Trust against Pioneer and Woodside, including the claims brought by Plaintiffs in the Lawsuit, and to enter into this Agreement.

(a)           Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Petition for Instructions .  The Trustee shall seek Court approval of this Agreement by filing a Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Petition for Instructions (the “Motion”).

(b)           Hearing on the Motion .  The Trustee shall set a preliminary hearing with the Court on the Motion at which the Trustee shall request the Court to issue an Order setting a final hearing on the Motion to occur no fewer than 30 days after the Trustee provides the notice required by the Court.

(c)           Notice to Beneficiaries .  The Trustee shall provide notice of this Agreement and the final hearing on the Motion to all Beneficiaries of the Mesa Trust in accord with Sections 115.015 and 115.016 of the TEXAS PROPERTY CODE.  Within five days of serving notice on all Beneficiaries, the Trustee shall confirm to the Court and the

6

 



parties to the Lawsuit, in writing, that the Trustee provided notice to all Beneficiaries as ordered by the Court.  The costs of providing the notice required by the Court shall be borne by the Mesa Trust.

(d)           Order .  The Trustee shall submit an Order approving the Motion and this Agreement substantially in the form attached as Exhibit A to this Agreement.

2.2.          Failure to Obtain Court Approval .  Court approval of the Agreement as set forth in Section 2.1 and the entry of a final Order as contemplated in Section 2.1(d) are necessary prerequisites to the enforceability of this Agreement.  The Court’s refusal to enter an Order substantially in the form of the order set forth in Section 2.1(d) renders this Agreement void and unenforceable between the Parties.

2.3.          Modified Procedures.   In the event that the Parties desire or are required to modify any of the procedures to be undertaken pursuant to this Agreement, they shall petition the Court, with notice to the parties to the Lawsuit, identifying the modification and seeking the Court’s review and/or approval of the modification.

ARTICLE III.
RELEASES

3.1.          Release by the Mesa Trust, the Trustee, and the Beneficiaries .  Upon entry of the Order provided for in Article II above,


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more