Back to top

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

Research and Development Agreement

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT | Document Parties: ACCENTIA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS INC You are currently viewing:
This Research and Development Agreement involves

ACCENTIA BIOPHARMACEUTICALS INC

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Date: 2/11/2005
Industry: Biotechnology and Drugs     Sector: Healthcare

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, Parties: accentia biopharmaceuticals inc
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

 

Exhibit 10.12

 

PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE

 

COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Cooperative Research and Development Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the “CRADA,” consists of this Cover Page, an attached Agreement, and various Appendices referenced in the Agreement. This Cover Page serves to identify the Parties to this CRADA:

 

(1) the following Bureau(s), Institute(s), Center(s) or Division(s) of the National Institutes of Health (“NIH”), the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”):

 

The National Cancer Institute (“NCI”), hereinafter singly or collectively referred to as the Public Health Service (“PHS”); and

 

(2) Biovest International, which has offices at 540 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632-3022, hereinafter referred to as the “Collaborator.”

 

     Page 1 of 11    CONFIDENTIAL

 


COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

 

Article 1. Introduction

 

This Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) between PHS and the Collaborator will be effective when signed by all Parties. The research and development activities which will be undertaken by each of the Parties in the course of this CRADA are detailed in the Research Plan (RP) which is attached as Appendix A. The funding and staffing commitments of the Parties are set forth in Appendix B. Any exceptions or changes to the CRADA are set forth in Appendix C. This CRADA is made under the authority of the Federal Technology Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. 3710a and is governed by its terms.

 

Article 2. Definitions

 

As used in this CRADA, the following terms shall have the indicated meanings:

 

2.1 “Affiliate” means any corporation or other business entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control with Collaborator. For this purpose, “control” means direct or indirect beneficial ownership of at least fifty (50) percent of the voting stock or at least fifty (50) percent interest in the income of such corporation or other business.

 

2.2 “Cooperative Research and Development Agreement” or “CRADA” means this Agreement, entered into by PHS pursuant to the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 3710a et seq. and Executive Order 12591 of October 10. 1987.

 

2.3 “Government” means the Government of the United States as represented through the PHS agency that is a Party to this agreement.

 

2.4 “IP means intellectual property.

 

2.5 “Invention” means any invention or discovery which is or may be patentable or otherwise protected under title 35, United States Code, or any novel variety or plant which is or may be protectable under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 2321 et seq.).

 

2.6 “Principal Investigator(s)” or “PIs” means the persons designated respectively by the Parties to this CRADA who will be responsible for the scientific and technical conduct of the RP.

 

2.7 “Proprietary/Confidential Information” means confidential scientific, business, or financial information provided that such information does not include:

 

  2.7.1   information that is publicly known or available from other sources who are not under a confidentiality obligation to the source of the information;

 

  2.7.2  information which has been made available by its owners to others without a confidentiality obligation;

 

  2.7.3  information which is already known by or available to the receiving Party without a confidentiality obligation; or

 

    Page 2 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


  2.7.4  information which relates to potential hazards or cautionary warnings associated with the production, handling or use of the subject matter of the Research Plan of this CRADA.

 

2.8 “Research Materials” means all tangible materials other than Subject Data first produced in the performance of this CRADA.

 

2.9 “Research Plan” or “RP” means the statement in Appendix A of the respective research and development commitments of the Parties to this CRADA.

 

2.10 “Subject Invention” means any Invention of the Parties, conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the performance of the Research Plan of this CRADA.

 

2.11 “Subject Data” means all recorded information first produced in the performance of this CRADA by the Parties.

 

Article 3. Cooperative Research

 

3.1 Principal Investigators. PHS research work under this CRADA will be performed by the PHS laboratory identified in the RP, and the PHS Principal Investigator (PI) designated in the RP will be responsible for the scientific and technical conduct of this project on behalf of PHS. Also designated in the RP is the Collaborator PI who will be responsible for the scientific and technical conduct of this project on behalf of the Collaborator.

 

3.2 Research Plan Change. The RP may be modified by mutual written consent of the Principal Investigators. Substantial changes in the scope of the RP will be treated as amendments under Article 13.6.

 

Article 4. Reports

 

4.1 Interim Reports. The Parties shall exchange formal written interim progress reports on a schedule agreed to by the PIs, but at least within twelve (12) months after this CRADA becomes effective and at least within every twelve (12) months thereafter. Such reports shall set forth the technical progress made, identifying such problems as may have been encountered and establishing goals and objectives requiring further effort, any modifications to the Research Plan pursuant to Article 3.2, and identify Subject Inventions pursuant to Article 6.1.

 

4.2 Final Reports. The Parties shall exchange final reports of their results within four (4) months after completing the projects described in the RP or after the expiration or termination of this CRADA.

 

Article 5. Financial and Staffing Obligations

 

5.1 PHS and Collaborator Contributions. The contributions of the Parties, including payment schedules, if applicable, are set forth in Appendix B. PHS shall not be obligated to perform any of the research specified herein or to take any other action required by this CRADA if the funding is not provided as set forth in Appendix B. PHS shall return excess funds to the Collaborator when it sends its final fiscal report pursuant to Article 5.2, except for staffing support pursuant to Article 10.3. Collaborator acknowledges that the U.S. Government will have the authority to retain and expend any excess funds for up to one (1) year subsequent to the expiration or termination of the CRADA to cover any costs incurred during the term of the CRADA in undertaking the work set forth in the RP.

 

    Page 3 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


5.2 Accounting Records. PHS shall maintain separate and distinct current accounts, records, and other evidence supporting all its obligations under this CRADA. and shall provide the Collaborator a final fiscal report pursuant to Article 4.2.

 

5.3 Capital Equipment. Equipment purchased by PHS with funds provided by the Collaborator shall be the property of PHS. All capital equipment provided under this CRADA by one party for the use of another Party remains the property of the providing Party unless other disposition is mutually agreed upon by in writing by the Parties. If title to this equipment remains with the providing Party, that Party is responsible for maintenance of the equipment and the costs of its transportation to and from the site where it will be used.

 

Article 6. Patent Applications

 

6.1 Reporting. The Parties shall promptly report to each other in writing each Subject Invention and any patent applications filed thereon resulting from the research conducted under this CRADA that is reported to them by their respective employees. Each Party shall report all Subject Inventions to the other Party in sufficient detail to determine inventorship. Such reports shall be treated as Proprietary/Confidential Information in accordance with Article 8.4.

 

6.2 Filing of Patent Applications. Each party shall be responsible for filing patent or other IP applications in a timely manner and at its own expense and after consultation with the other Party. The Parties will consult and mutually determine a filing strategy for jointly-owned subject inventions.

 

6.3 Patent Expenses. The expenses attendant to the filing of patent or other IP applications generally shall be paid by the Parly filing such application. If an exclusive license to any Subject Invention is granted to the Collaborator, the Collaborator shall be responsible for all past and future out-of-pocket expenses in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and maintenance of any applications claiming such exclusively-licensed inventions and any patents or other IP grants that may issue on such applications. The Collaborator may waive its exclusive license rights on any application, patent or other IP grant at any time, and incur no subsequent compensation obligation for that application, patent or IP grant.

 

6.4 Prosecution of Intellectual Property Applications. Within one month of receipt or filing, each Party shall provide the other Party with copies of the applications and all documents received from or filed with the relevant patent or other IP office in connection with the prosecution of such applications. Each Party shall also provide the other Party with the power to inspect and make copies of all documents retained in the patent or other IP application files by the applicable patent or other IP office. Where licensing is contemplated by Collaborator, the Parties agree to consult with each other with respect to the prosecution of applications for PHS Subject Inventions and joint Subject Inventions. If the Parties agree that Collaborator shall file and prosecute IP applications on joint Subject Inventions, then Collaborator agrees to grant PHS an associate power of attorney (or its equivalent) on such IP applications.

 

Article 7. Licensing

 

7.1

Option for Commercialization License. With respect to Government IP rights to any Subject Invention not made solely by the Collaborator’s employees for which a patent or other IP application is filed, PHS hereby grants to the Collaborator an exclusive option to elect an exclusive or nonexclusive commercialization license, which is substantially in the form of the appropriate model PHS license agreement. This option does not apply to Subject Inventions conceived prior to the effective date of this CRADA that are reduced to practice under this CRADA, if prior to that reduction to practice, PHS has

 

    Page 4 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


 

filed a patent application on the invention and has licensed it or offered to license it to a third party. The terms of the license will fairly reflect the nature of the invention, the relative contributions of the Parties to the invention and the CRADA, the risks incurred by the Collaborator and the costs of subsequent research and development needed to bring the invention to the marketplace. The field of use of the license will be commensurate with the scope of the RP.

 

7.2 Exercise of License Option. The option of Article 7.1 must be exercised by written notice mailed within three (3) months after either (I) Collaborator receives written notice from PHS that the patent or other IP application has been filed; or (ii) the date Collaborator files such IP application. Exercise of this option by the Collaborator initiates a negotiation period that expires nine (9) months after the exercise of the option. If the last proposal by the Collaborator has not been responded to in writing by PHS within this nine (9) month period, the negotiation period shall be extended to expire one (1) month after PHS so responds, during which month the Collaborator may accept in writing the final license proposal of PHS. In the absence of such acceptance, or an extension of the time limits by PHS, PHS will be free to license such IP rights to others. In the event that the Collaborator elects the option for an exclusive license, but no such license is executed during the negotiation period, PHS agrees not to make an offer for an exclusive license on more favorable terms to a third party for a period of six (6) months without first offering Collaborator those more favorable terms. These times may be extended at the sole discretion of PHS upon good cause shown in writing by the Collaborator.

 

7.3 License for PHS Employee Inventions and Joint Inventions. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.’ 3710a(b)(l)(A), for Subject Inventions made under this CRADA by a PHS employee(s) or jointly by such employee(s) and employees of the Collaborator and licensed pursuant to the option of Article 7.1, the Collaborator grants to the Government a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice the invention or have the invention practiced throughout the world by or on behalf of the Government. In the exercise of such license, the Government shall not publicly disclose trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged or confidential within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4) or which would be considered as such if it had been obtained from a non-Federal party.

 

7.4 License in Collaborator Inventions. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.’ 3710a(b)(2), for inventions made solely by Collaborator employees under this CRADA, the Collaborator grants to the Government a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up license to practice the invention or have the invention practiced throughout the world by or on behalf of the Government for research or other Government purposes.

 

7.5 Third Party License. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.’ 3710a(b)(l)(B), if PHS grants an exclusive license to a Subject Invention made wholly by PHS employees or jointly with a Collaborator under this CRADA, the Government shall retain the right to require the Collaborator to grant to a responsible applicant a nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive sublicense to use the invention in Collaborator=s licensed field of use on terms that are reasonable under the circumstances; or if the Collaborator fails to grant such a license, to grant the license itself. The exercise of such rights by the Government shall only be in exceptional circumstances and only if the Government determines (I) the action is necessary to meet health or safety needs that are not reasonably satisfied by Collaborator, (ii) the action is necessary to meet requirements for public use specified by Federal regulations, and such requirements are not reasonably satisfied by the Collaborator; or (iii) the Collaborator has failed to comply with an agreement containing provisions described in 15 U.S.C. 3710a(c)(4)(B). The determination made by the Government under this Article is subject to administrative appeal and judicial review under 35 U.S.C. 203(2).

 

7.6

Joint Inventions Not Exclusively Licensed. In the event that the Collaborator does not acquire an exclusive commercialization license to IP rights in all fields in joint Subject Inventions then each Party

 

    Page 5 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


 

shall have the right to use the joint Subject Invention and to license its use to others in all fields not exclusively licensed to Collaborator. The Parties may agree to a joint licensing approach for such IP rights.

 

Article 8. Proprietary Rights and Publication

 

8.1 Right of Access. PHS and the Collaborator agree to exchange all Subject Data produced in the course of research under this CRADA. Research Materials will be shared equally by the Parties to the CRADA unless other disposition is agreed to by the Parties. All Parties to this CRADA will be free to utilize Subject Data and Research Materials for their own purposes, consistent with their obligations under this CRADA.

 

8.2 Ownership of Subject Data and Research Materials. Subject to the sharing requirements of Paragraph 8.1 and the regulatory filing requirements of Paragraph 8.3, the producing Party will retain ownership of and title to all Subject Inventions, all Subject Data and all Research Materials produced solely by their investigators. Jointly developed Subject Inventions, Subject Data and Research Materials will be jointly owned.

 

8.3 Dissemination of Subject Data and Research Materials. To the extent permitted by law, the Collaborator and PHS agree to use reasonable efforts to keep Subject Data and Research Materials confidential until published or until corresponding patent applications are filed. Any information that would identify human subjects of research or patients will always be maintained confidentially. To the extent permitted by law, the Collaborator shall have the exclusive right to use any and all CRADA Subject Data in and for any regulatory filing by or on behalf of Collaborator, except that PHS shall have the exclusive right to use Subject Data for that purpose, and authorize others to do so, if the CRADA is terminated or if Collaborator abandons its commercialization efforts. Collaborator acknowledges the basic research mission of the PHS, and agrees that after publication, PHS may make unpatented research materials arising out of this CRADA available to third parties for further research.

 

8.4 Proprietary/Confidential Information. Each Party agrees to limit its disclosure of Proprietary/Confidential Information to the amount necessary to carry out the Research Plan of this CRADA, and shall place a confidentiality notice on all such information. Confidential oral communications shall be reduced to writing within 30 days by the disclosing Party. Each Party receiving Proprietary/Confidential Information agrees that any information so designated shall be used by it only for the purposes described in the attached Research Plan. Any Party may object to the designation of information as Proprietary/Confidential Information by another Party. Subject Data and Research Materials developed solely by the Collaborator may be designated as Proprietary/Confidential Information when they are wholly separable from the Subject Data and Research Materials developed jointly with PHS investigators, and advance designation of such data and material categories is set forth in the RP. The exchange of other confidential information, e.g., patient-identifying data, should be similarly limited and treated. Jointly developed Subject Data and Research Material derived from the Research Plan may be disclosed by Collaborator to a third party under a confidentiality agreement for the purpose of possible sublicensing pursuant to the Licensing Agreement and subject to Article 8.7.

 

8.5

Protection of Proprietary/Confidential Information. Proprietary/Confidential Information shall not be disclosed, copied, reproduced or otherwise made available to any other person or entity without the consent of the owning Party except as required under court order or the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. ‘ 552). Each Party agrees to use its best efforts to maintain the confidentiality of Proprietary/Confidential Information. Each Party agrees that the other Party is not liable for the disclosure of Proprietary/Confidential Information which, after notice to and consultation with the concerned Party, the

 

    Page 6 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


 

other Party in possession of the Proprietary/Confidential Information determines may not be lawfully withheld, provided the concerned Party has been given an opportunity to seek a court order to enjoin disclosure.

 

8.6 Duration of Confidentiality Obligation. The obligation to maintain the confidentiality of Proprietary/Confidential Information shall expire at the earlier of the date when the information is no longer Proprietary Information as defined in Article 2.7 or three (3) years after the expiration or termination date of this CRADA . The Collaborator may request an extension to this term when necessary to protect Proprietary/Confidential Information relating to products not yet commercialized.

 

8.7 Publication. The Parties are encouraged to make publicly available the results of their research. Before either Party submits a paper or abstract for publication or otherwise intends to publicly disclose information about a Subject Invention, Subject Data or Research Materials, the other Party shall be provided thirty (30) days to review the proposed publication or disclosure to assure that Proprietary/Confidential Information is protected. The publication or other disclosure shall be delayed for up to thirty (30) additional days upon written request by any Party as necessary to preserve U.S. or foreign patent or other IP rights.

 

Article 9. Representations and Warranties

 

9.1 Representations and Warranties of PHS. PHS hereby represents and warrants to the Collaborator that the official signing this CRADA has authority to do so.

 

9.2 Representations and Warranties of the Collaborator.

 

(a) The Collaborator hereby represents and warrants to PHS that the Collaborator has the requisite power and authority to enter into this CRADA and to perform according to its terms, and that the Collaborator’s official signing this CRADA has authority to do so. The Collaborator further represents that it is financially able to satisfy any funding commitments made in Appendix B.

 

(b) The Collaborator certifies that the statements herein are true, complete, and accurate to the best of its knowledge. The Collaborator is aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject it to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties.

 

Article 10. Termination

 

10.1 Termination By Mutual Consent. PHS and the Collaborator may terminate this CRADA, or portions thereof, at any time by mutual written consent. In such event the Parties shall specify the disposition of all property, inventions, patent or other IP applications and other results of work accomplished or in progress, arising from or performed under this CRADA, all in accordance with the rights granted to the Parties under the terms of this Agreement.

 

10.2 Unilateral Termination. Either PHS or the Collaborator may unilaterally terminate this entire CRADA at any time by giving written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the desired termination date, and any rights accrued in property, patents or other IP rights shall be disposed of as provided in paragraph 10.1, except that PHS may, at its option, retain funds transferred to PHS prior to unilateral termination by Collaborator for use in completing the Research Plan solely or with another partner.

 

    Page 7 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


10.3 Staffing. If this CRADA is mutually or unilaterally terminated prior to its expiration, funds will nevertheless remain available to PHS for continuing any staffing commitment made by the Collaborator pursuant to Article 5.1 above and Appendix B, if applicable, for a period of six (6) months after such termination. If there are insufficient funds to cover this expense, the Collaborator agrees to pay the difference.

 

10.4 New Commitments. No Party shall make new commitments related to this CRADA after a mutual termination or notice of a unilateral termination and shall, to the extent feasible, cancel all outstanding commitments and contracts by the termination date.

 

10.5 Termination Costs. Concurrently with the exchange of final reports pursuant to Articles 4.2 and 5.2, PHS shall submit to the Collaborator for payment a statement of all costs incurred prior to the date of termination and for all reasonable termination costs including the cost of returning Collaborator property or removal of abandoned property, for which Collaborator shall be responsible.

 

Article 11. Disputes

 

11.1 Settlement. Any dispute arising under this CRADA which is not disposed of by agreement of the Principal Investigators shall be submitted jointly to the signatories of this CRADA. If the signatories are unable to jointly resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days after notification thereof, the Assistant Secretary for Health (or his/her designee or successor) shall propose a resolution. Nothing in this Article shall prevent any Party from pursuing any additional administrative remedies that may be available and, after exhaustion of such administrative remedies, pursuing all available judicial remedies.

 

11.2 Continuation of Work. Pending the resolution of any dispute or claim pursuant to this Article, the Parties agree that performance of all obligations shall be pursued diligently in accordance with the direction of the PHS signatory.

 

Article 12. Liability

 

12.1 Property. The U.S. Government shall not be responsible for damages to any Collaborator property provided to PHS, where Collaborator retains title to the property, or any property acquired by Collaborator for its own use pursuant to this CRADA.

 

12.2 NO WARRANTIES. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY STATED IN ARTICLE 9, THE PARTIES MAKE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY AS TO ANY MATTER WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING THE CONDITIONS OF THE RESEARCH OR ANY INVENTION OR PRODUCT, WHETHER TANGIBLE OR INTANGIBLE, MADE, OR DEVELOPED UNDER THIS CRADA, OR THE OWNERSHIP, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH OR ANY INVENTION OR PRODUCT.

 

12.3 Indemnification. The Collaborator agrees to hold the U.S. Government harmless and to indemnify the Government for all liabilities, demands, damages, expenses and losses arising out of the use by the Collaborator for any purpose of the Subject Data, Research Materials and/or Subject Inventions produced in whole or part by PHS employees under this CRADA, unless due to the negligence or willful misconduct of PHS, its employees, or agents. The Collaborator shall be liable for any claims or damages it incurs in connection with this CRADA. PHS has no authority to indemnify the Collaborator.

 

    Page 8 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


12.4 Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be liable for any unforeseeable event beyond its reasonable control not caused by the fault or negligence of such Party, which causes such Party to be unable to perform its obligations under this CRADA, and which it has been unable to overcome by the exercise of due diligence. In the event of the occurrence of such a force majeure event, the Party unable to perform shall promptly notify the other Party. It shall further use its best efforts to resume performance as quickly as possible and shall suspend performance only for such period of time as is necessary as a result of the force majeure event.

 

Article 13. Miscellaneous

 

13.1 Governing Law. The construction, validity, performance and effect of this CRADA shall be governed by Federal law, as applied by the Federal Courts in the District of Columbia. Federal law and regulations will preempt any conflicting or inconsistent provisions in this CRADA.

 

13.2 Entire Agreement. This CRADA constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties concerning the subject matter of this CRADA and supersedes any prior understanding or written or oral agreement.

 

13.3 Headings. Titles and headings of the articles and subarticles of this CRADA are for convenient reference only, do not form a part of this CRADA, and shall in no way affect its interpretation. The PHS component that is the Party for all purposes of this CRADA is the Bureau(s), Institute(s), Center(s) or Division(s) listed on the Cover Page herein.

 

13.4 Waivers. None of the provisions of this CRADA shall be considered waived by any Party unless such waiver is given in writing to the other Party. The failure of a Party to insist upon strict performance of any of the terms and conditions hereof, or failure or delay to exercise any rights provided herein or by law, shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights of any Party.

 

13.5 Severability. The illegality or invalidity of any provisions of this CRADA shall not impair, affect, or invalidate the other provisions of this CRADA.

 

13.6 Amendments. If either Party desires a modification to this CRADA, the Parties shall, upon reasonable notice of the proposed modification or extension by the Party desiring the change, confer in good faith to determine the desirability of such modification or extension. Such modification shall not be effective until a written amendment is signed by the signatories to this CRADA or by their representatives duly authorized to execute such amendment.

 

13.7 Assignment. Neither this CRADA nor any rights or obligations of any Party hereunder shall be assigned or otherwise transferred by either Party without the prior written consent of the other Party.

 

13.8 Notices. All notices pertaining to or required by this CRADA shall be in writing and shall be signed by an authorized representative and shall be delivered by hand or sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, to the addresses indicated on the signature page for each Party. Notices regarding the exercise of license options shall be made pursuant to Article 7.2. Any Party may change such address by notice given to the other Party in the manner set forth above.

 

13.9 Independent Contractors. The relationship of the Parties to this CRADA is that of independent contractors and not agents of each other or joint venturers or partners. Each Party shall maintain sole and exclusive control over its personnel and operations. Collaborator employees who will be working at PHS facilities may be asked to sign a Guest Researcher or Special Volunteer Agreement appropriately modified in view of the terms of this CRADA.

 

    Page 9 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


13.10  Use of Name or Endorsements . By entering into this CRADA. PHS does not directly or indirectly endorse any product or service provided, or to be provided, whether directly or indirectly related to either this CRADA or to any patent or other IP license or agreement which implements this CRADA by its successors, assignees, or licensees. The Collaborator shall not in any way state or imply that this CRADA is an endorsement of any such product or service by the U.S. Government or any of its organizational units or employees. Collaborator issued press releases that reference or rely upon the work of PHS under this CRADA shall be made available to PHS at least 7 days prior to publication for review and comment.

 

13.11  Exceptions to this CRADA. Any exceptions or modifications to this CRADA that are agreed to by the Panics prior to their execution of this CRADA are set forth in Appendix C.

 

13.12  Reasonable Consent. Whenever a Party’s consent or permission is required under this CRADA, such consent or permission shall not be unreasonably withheld.

 

Article 14. Duration of Agreement

 

14.1 Duration. It is mutually recognized that the duration of this project cannot be rigidly defined in advance, and that the contemplated time periods for various phases of the RP are only good faith guidelines subject to adjustment by mutual agreement to fit circumstances as the RP proceeds. In no case will the term of this CRADA extend beyond the term indicated in the RP unless it is revised in accordance with Article 13.6.

 

14.2 Survivability. The provisions of Articles 4.2, 5-8, 10.3-10.5, 11.1, 12.2-12.4, 13.1, 13.10 and 14.2 shall survive the termination of this CRADA.

 

SIGNATURES BEGIN ON THE NEXT PAGE

 

    Page 10 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


FOR PHS:

       

/s/ Alan Ralsor

     

8/30/01

Alan Ralsor, M.D.

     

Date

Deputy Director, NCI

       

 

Mailing Address for Notices:

 

National Cancer Institute-Frederick

Technology Transfer Branch

1003 West Seventh Street, Suite 502

Frederick MD 21701

Phone: 301-846-5465

FAX: 301-846-6820

 

FOR THE COLLABORATOR:

       

/s/ Christopher Kyriakides

         
       

Date

       

 

Mailing Address for Notices:

 

Biovest International, Inc.

8500 Evergreen Boulevard

Minneapolis MN 55433

763-786-0302

763-786-0915

 

    Page 11 of 11   CONFIDENTIAL

 


 

APPENDIX A

 

RESEARCH PLAN

 

Clinical Development of Hybridoma-Based Idiotypic Vaccines for

Treatment of Follicular B-Cell Lymphoma

 

NCI Principal Investigator(s)

Larry W. Kwak, M.D., Ph.D.

Center for Cancer Research (CCR)

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

 

Collaborator Principal Investigator(s)

Christopher Kyriakides, M.D., FAAPMR

Chief Executive Officer

Biovest International, Inc.

 

Term of CRADA

Eight (8) years from the date of the final CRADA signature.

 

A Letter of Intent (LOI) for this CRADA was executed

by and between the Parties on January 9, 2001.

An Extension to the LOI was executed by and between

the Parties on June 25, 2001

 

    A-1   CONFIDENTIAL

 


GOALS OF THIS CRADA

 

The goal of this project is to develop an efficacious hybridoma-based idiotype vaccine to produce long-term disease-free survival in follicular B-cell lymphoma patients who have attained a complete clinical response from chemotherapy and to compile data required to support a Biological License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for hybridoma-based idiotype follicular B-cell lymphoma vaccine.

 

The Center for Cancer Research (CCR), National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Collaborator shall work together toward the successful development of the hybridoma-based idiotype vaccine as a safe and effective novel anti-cancer treatment for follicular B-cell lymphoma. The CCR will work closely with Collaborator to obtain and evaluate the clinical data that may be required to allow Collaborator to obtain regulatory approval by the FDA. Collaborator will provide expertise in the development, formulation and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) production of the vaccine. Additionally, CCR will work with Collaborator in the ongoing clinical trial planned under this CRADA as well as all regulatory aspects and the BLA filings necessary for Collaborator to obtain marketing approval.

 

The scope of this CRADA includes the development of the processes required for large-scale GMP production of adequate numbers of GMP-produced and formulated idiotype vaccines-to complete the clinical development of this treatment for follicular B-Cell lymphoma. This vaccine strategy involves the use of an immunological adjuvant, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which is currently being provided to NCI for this study under a Clinical Trial Agreement with Immunex.

 

BACKGROUND

 

INTRODUCTION

 

Current Treatment of Indolent Follicular Lymphomas

The indolent follicular lymphomas (FL) are follicular small-cleaved cell (FSC) and follicular mixed lymphoma (FM). Stage I and II patients comprise only 10% to 15% of all cases of follicular lymphomas and are best managed with radiation therapy. Eighty-five percent of patients with follicular lymphomas present with stage III or IV disease. The optimal management of these patients remains controversial and has generally followed two divergent approaches (1, 2). An aggressive approach, which has included radiation therapy, combination chemotherapy, or combined modality therapy; and a conservative approach that involves no initial treatment followed by a single-agent chemotherapy or involved-field radiotherapy when required (3, 4). Most forms of systemic therapy have the capacity to produce high complete response rates. However, they have failed to produce long-term disease-free survival or to prolong overall survival; thus, it has become clear that the vast majority of patients with this disease will relapse and die of their lymphoma, despite its usually indolent course.

 

Technology Summary

 

The development of a vaccine against human malignancies has been a long-sought goal, which has yet to be achieved. Many of the efforts toward this end have been frustrated by the lack of identification of a tumor-specific antigen which would allow tumor cells to be distinguished from normal cells. Conceptually, such an antigen could be used as a vaccine to induce the host’s immune system to reject cells bearing that antigen.

 

    A-2   CONFIDENTIAL

 


Immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules are composed of heavy and light chains, which possess highly specific variable regions at their amino termini. The variable regions of heavy and light chains combine to form the unique antigen-recognition site of the Ig protein. These variable regions contain determinants that can themselves be recognized as antigens, or idiotypes . B-cell malignancies are composed of clonal proliferations of cells synthesizing a single antibody molecule with unique variable regions in the heavy and light chains. B-cell lymphomas are neoplasms of mature resting and reactive lymphocytes, which generally express synthesized Ig on the cell surface. The idiotypic determinants of the surface Ig of a B-cell lymphoma can thus serve as a tumor-specific marker for the malignant clone.

 

Studies in experimental animals, as well as in man, have demonstrated the utility of the Ig idiotype as a tumor-specific antigen (5, 6). Lynch and Eisen were the first to demonstrate that active immunization against idiotypic determinants on malignant B cells could produce resistance to tumor growth, and this phenomenon of idiotype tumor resistance has been reproduced subsequently in a number of syngeneic experimental tumor models, as well as specific anti-tumor therapy against established tumors (7-16). These results, taken together, provided the rationale for testing autologous tumor-derived idiotypic surface Ig (Id) as a therapeutic “vaccine” against human B-cell lymphoma.

 

Summary of Previous Clinical Studies Sponsored by NCI

 

Phase 1 Clinical Trial.

 

Kwak et al. first immunized human patients with B-cell lymphoma with autologous Id protein (17). The Id-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Id-KLH) was emulsified in a Pluronic polymer-based adjuvant vehicle formulation. Ultimately, approximately 40 patients were treated on this protocol. Because the study population was heterogeneous, it was not designed to answer the question of anti-tumor efficacy. Rather, this first study assessed the question of immunogenicity; i.e., is it even possible to immunize a patient against a self-tumor antigen? In this context, this study was important, because it demonstrated that patients with B-cell lymphoma could be induced to make primarily idiotype-specific antibody responses, but with little evidence for T-cell immunity.

 

Improving the potency of the Id-KLH Vaccine.

 

At the NCI, the objective of Id vaccine development has been to further optimize the immunogenicity of this vaccine. To this end, NCI focused on the use of novel immunological adjuvants, which were 1), more potent and 2) more effective in the induction of cell-mediated immune responses, particularly CD8+ T-cells, compared with the pluronic polymer-based adjuvant used in the pilot study.

 

As a preclinical aim, Kwak et al. utilized a murine B cell tumor as a model system in which to screen promising immunological adjuvants. A number of these included cytokines, and among these, GM-CSF emerged as a promising adjuvant for idiotypic Ig antigen (18).

 

The results demonstrated that the augmented survival benefit afforded by immunization with relevant Id-KLH alone could significantly enhanced by the addition of GM-CSF at either the 100 or 10,000 unit dose. A curious but reproducible observation was the loss of this protective effect at a higher dose of GM-CSF of 50,000 units. These data suggest that GM-CSF may have a potent adjuvant effect in vivo for Id-KLH antigen, especially at relatively low doses.

 

    A-3   CONFIDENTIAL

 


Furthermore, T-cell subset depletion experiments demonstrated that effector CD8+ T-cells were required for anti-tumor immunity.

 

Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

 

Based on the findings of this preclinical study, the NCI sponsored a Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate the ability of this new idiotype vaccine to elicit tumor-specific T-cell immunity, as measured by the ability of patient T cells to specifically lyse their own tumor cells in vitro, and to exert antitumor effects as measured by the elimination of t(14; 18)-bearing cells from the peripheral blood of uniformly treated FL patients in first CR (complete remission). Patients in this study were previously untreated and received a uniform chemotherapy regimen, PACE; Prednisone, Adriamycin, Cytoxan, and Etoposide. (modified ProMACE without methotrexate). By design, therefore, they comprised a very homogeneous patient population in a minimal residual disease state. Of 35 patients, 23 (66%) achieved CR by standard clinical criteria. One of the patients was lost to analysis because of early relapse within six months, and two were excluded because a vaccine could not be made. This left a total study group of 20 patients in CR. Six to 15 months after completion of chemotherapy, these 20 patients were treated with a series of five monthly vaccinations with autologous FL Ig protein (0.5 mg) conjugated to KLH, together with local granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, 100 or 500 mcg/m2) subcutaneously (19).

 

Eighteen of 20 patients remain in continuous, first complete remission (median: 42+ months from completion of chemotherapy, range: 28+ to 53+). UPN 9 and 14 relapsed at 15 and 7 months after completion of vaccine therapy, respectively. UPN 9 had never cleared the t(14; 18)-bearing cells from the peripheral blood; UPN 14 did not have the MBR rearrangement and thus, molecular CR status could not be established.

 

The rationale for a pivotal, randomized trial, which is the subject of this CRADA is thus based on three independent results from this completed Phase 2 study: (1) tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses (cytotoxicity against autologous FL targets and cytokine production) were seen in 17 of 20 (85%) vaccinated patients, (2) 8 of 11 (73%) patients sampled after completion of vaccination converted to PCR negative and have maintained both PCR negativity and clinical CR, and (3) with a median follow-up of 36+ months after completion of chemotherapy (range 22+ to 47+ months), 18 of 20 (90%) patients remain in continuous clinical CR.

 

Taken together, these data suggest that idiotype vaccination can elicit a tumor-specific response that is associated with clearance of residual tumor cells from the blood in the majority of patients with FL. It remains to be determined whether molecular CR is associated with prolonged disease-free survival. However, this systematic analysis of molecular response rate provides the first evidence for an anti-tumor effect of vaccination. Finally, this study established GM-CSF as an essential component of the vaccine strategy, particularly for induction of CD8+ T-cell responses.

 

CCR, NCI

 

Dr. Kwak and his group pioneered the first human studies of vaccines for B-cell malignancies. Dr Kwak’s group has a broad range of scientific and clinical interests spanning tumor immunology, adoptive T cell therapy, and management of lymphomas and myelomas.

 

    A-4   CONFIDENTIAL

 


Specific work in his laboratory is focused on studies of immunobiology and immunotherapy of hematological malignancies. The laboratory’s principal objective is to obtain conclusive proof for the cancer vaccine concept; i.e., simply that it is possible to induce an immune response against a self protein, which is inherently poorly immunogenic, in human cancer patients. The goals for vaccine development are: (1) to increase the potency of vaccine formulations, and (2) to develop formulations which are more effective in activating the cellular arm of the immune response. The working hypothesis is that achieving the eventual goal of demonstrating clinical efficacy will depend on the ability of vaccines to elicit sustained, potent cell-mediated responses.

 

The current clinical trial of Id vaccination in previously untreated patients with follicular lymphomas initiated by the laboratory, which is the subject of this CRADA, features a new formulation of the prototype Id-KLH conjugate vaccine using GM-CSF as a potent immunological adjuvant. CD8+ T cell responses, capable of lysing autologous tumor targets, and molecular remissions have been observed in the vast majority of vaccinated patients.

 

BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL INC.

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The proprietary technology of Biovest (hollow fiber bioreactor instrumentation) that will be applied under this CRADA utilizes a patented process that optimizes fluid flow dynamics within perfused bioreactors to maintain high cell densities and continuously harvest secreted protein for extended periods of time. An experienced team of mechanical, electrical, software and biochemical engineers was established at Biovest to develop this technology. As a result of these efforts, the company gained significant expertise in the large-scale application of cGMP mammalian cell culture, which has subsequently been applied to a wide variety of cell lines for hollow fiber bioreactor production of recombinant or fusion based proteins. Combined with this existing expertise, a cGMP process will be developed that will be designed to facilitate commercial application of patient-specific vaccines.

 

Biovest’s cell culture expertise was recognized when the National Center for Research Resources, NIH, awarded the National Cell Culture Center to Biovest. This research resource facility was awarded to Biovest in 1990 through a competitive five-year Cooperative Agreement Award, which has been renewed twice, currently funded through September 2005 This resource was created to provide the biomedical research community with subsidized access to professional large-scale cell culture services. During that time, Biovest has received hundreds of cell lines from academic investigators within many major research institutions in the United States, for the purpose of large-scale production. The majority of these lines are hybridoma, transfected or chimeric lines, created for the production of immunoglobulin.

 

In addition, for the past ten years, Biovest has provided contract services to biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies for use in clinical (cGMP) applications, produced in isolation suites within Biovest’s manufacturing facility. For the vast majority of these cell lines, automated hollow fiber bioreactor instrumentation is utilized for protein production. Biovest instrumentation, combined with years of process development experience for high-cell density perfusion culture, is one principal advantage of Biovest’s contract laboratory. This ability to modify hardware and understand the biochemical aspects of high-density culture has allowed us to develop successfully many processes unique to large-scale culture, which are typically incorporated into cGMP manufacture of the final product. Currently, a documentation system exists that addresses cGMP production requirements for

 

    A-5   CONFIDENTIAL

 


numerous specialized cell lines and processes with hollow fiber bioreactor technology in a multi-use facility. .

 

Similar to cGMP cell culture procedures, the existing instrumentation was developed as a Class I medical device, suitable for clinical application. This experience will be an important asset to the development and large-scale manufacture of instrumentation that can be applied to vaccine production.

 

Biovest International, Inc. (formerly Cellex Biosciences) is a leading manufacturer of hollow fiber bioreactor instrumentation and contract production services worldwide. In 1984, the corporation began development of instrumentation that automated the culture of mammalian cells on a large scale. Subsequently, the company utilized this hollow fiber bioreactor technology to create a cGMP production process that accommodates economic production of large amounts of specific cell-secreted protein (e.g. monoclonal antibodies) from numerous cell lines within one facility. During the past two decades, Biovest has developed a range of hollow fiber bioreactor instruments to address production at the research level through large-scale pharmaceutical needs. This patented technology is now widely accepted by numerous biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies throughout the world. As a result, Biovest, with perfusion cell culture methodology (hollow fiber bioreactor), offers a well-defined cGMP approach to large-scale commercial production of clinical and pharmaceutical grade proteins.

 

In December 1999, Biovest was awarded a contract with NCI to produce idiotype (antibody) as crude supernatant from heteromyeloma patient cell lines, created in Dr. Kwak’s laboratory. This idiotype was subsequently used to create the Id-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Id-KLH) lymphoma vaccine for study in an ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial, which is the subject of this CRADA. Creation of this vaccine is extremely labor intensive and Biovest, along with Dr. Kwak, recognized that commercial application would ultimately be dependent on research and development of a simplified or automated process. As such, Biovest responded to an NCI CRADA announcement and proposed a collaboration toward this end. Biovest will leverage its cell culture, purification, and clinical instrument expertise to facilitate production and commercialization of the idiotype tumor vaccine for B-cell lymphoma. Under the CRADA, a process and accompanying automated technology will be designed to produce and purify idiotype from each patient-specific cell line, both rapidly and cost effectively in a cGMP environment. Biovest recognizes that this patient-specific approach is dependent on technology designed to address these needs. Unlike conventional biologicals or drugs, which benefit from mass production or economy of scale, this new technology will be designed with the aim of allowing thousands of patient-specific vaccines to be manufactured efficiently each year.

 

Work Under this CRADA: The Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

 

To definitively answer the question of clinical efficacy, the NCI opened a multi-institutional, controlled, randomized Phase 3 clinical trial in January 2000 under the auspices of the NCI Vaccine Working Group and with support from the Office of the Director. Given the fact that no cancer vaccine has been licensed for use in the United States, designing this trial as a scientifically rigorous test of the cancer vaccine hypothesis, with scientific proof of principle as the primary objective, was felt to be paramount. Therefore, no changes in the key variables were (or will be) considered. Specifically, the design of the study remains identical to that of the Phase 2 study. Specifically, only patients with previously untreated lymphoma of follicular types are eligible, all patients receive uniform PACE chemotherapy, and vaccination is therefore administered to a homogeneous group of patients in first complete remission. Importantly, the vaccine formulation is also identical to that used in the Phase 2 trial, using the same hybridoma fusion technology to generate the vaccine, and using the same dose, schedule, and route of

 

    A-6   CONFIDENTIAL

 


vaccine administration. A multi-center consortium of clinical sites has been assembled, including Northwestern University, University of Pennsylvania, Duke University, Moffitt Cancer Center, and the NIH Clinical Center with additional sites under consideration. As of March 2001, approximately 50 patients have been enrolled on this study, which is currently being sponsored under NCI Investigational New Drug Application (IND) 5427.

 

The trial is anticipated to enroll a total of 563 patients, approximately 2/3 of whom are expected to achieve a clinical complete remission from PACE chemotherapy. Patients achieving a complete remission are randomized to begin treatment with either a specific vaccine consisting of Id-KLH + GM-CSF, or non-specific vaccine consisting of KLH + GM-CSF, in a 2:1 ratio (in favor of specific vaccine) starting six months after completion of chemotherapy.

 

This trial anticipates accrual over five years, and because of the long natural history of follicular lymphoma, an additional three years of follow-up time is projected to observe at least a 20% improvement in disease-free survival (study endpoint) for the experimental group.

 

The achievement of scientific proof of concept remains the primary objective of this Phase 3 trial. The addition of a CRADA partner will allow the data from this trial to be put together in support of a BLA with the FDA, which is necessary to help bring this vaccine to market. Furthermore, the CRADA partner’s contribution of intellectual property will allow for development of an automated system for the practical production of a vaccine to be brought to market and fulfill a currently unmet public health need. Finally, the addition of a corporate partner may make it possible to accelerate patient accrual in order to complete the trial and provide data necessary to support a BLA with the FDA in a shorter period of time.

 

Production of Id Vaccines .

 

Since Id is a clonal marker unique to each lymphoma, vaccines must be produced on an individualized basis for each patient. The strategy used to isolate immunogloblin from the surfaces of human B-cell lymphomas consists of performing a hybridization between the lymphoma cell and a modified, mouse/human heteromyeloma cell that grows in vitro and that has the cellular machinery to synthesize and secrete large quantities of immunoglobulin. Such myeloma fusion partners have been engineered not to secrete any immunoglobulin of their own; therefore, the immunoglobulin that is secreted following fusion is derived purely from the human tumor.

 

The production of Id protein begins with the isolation of malignant cells from tumor biopsy specimens, most commonly involved lymph nodes, although tumor cells isolated from peripheral blood, bone marrow or spleen can be used. The minimal starting material consists of about 75 million tumor cells. These cells are then fused with a hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT) - sensitive fusion partner, and hybridomas selected in HAT medium that secrete immuoglobulin with the type of heavy and light chains corresponding to the known immunophenotype of the tumor specimen are identified. This is vaccine production process step 1.

 

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the immunoglobulin variable region genes from both the hybridoma and the primary tumor specimen are performed, and the sequences are compared to establish the identify of the secreted immunoglobulin. This is vaccine production step 2.

 

Heterohybridomas identified in this way are expanded. This is vaccine production process step 3.

 

    A-7   CONFIDENTIAL

 


Id protein is the purified from collected culture supernatants by affinity chromatography depending on the isotype of the lymphoma immunoglobulin. Each idiotype protein is then conjugated to KLH. These two processes are collectively referred to as vaccine production process step 4.

 

This Id-conjugate is then used to immunize the patient from whose tumor it was originally isolated.

 

Vaccine production process Steps 1-2 are currently performed in Dr. Kwak’s laboratory at NCI-Frederick. Vaccine production process Step 3 is presently being conducted at Biovest under the Letter of Intent to this CRADA between Biovest and NCI executed January 9, 2001, and Step 4 is being performed under contract with Charles River Discovery & Development Services (CRDDC), Rockville, MD through Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a contractor in the Government-Owned, Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility at NCI-Frederick . While currently performed in Dr. Kwak’s laboratory at NCI, the technology for heterohybridoma fusion and selection and PCR sequencing will be transferred and optimized for GMP production at Biovest International. As noted above, the ultimate goal of this CRADA is to fully develop the technology allowing optimized Id vaccine production under GMP conditions that would be necessary for FDA approval for human clinical use. As part of that goal, NCI and Biovest will investigate the automation of this stepwise production of Id vaccines using Biovest’s proprietary instrument.

 

Under optimal conditions, approximately three months are required for production of the final product. This time period does not constitute a limitation, as the vaccine administration occurs following six to eight months of cytoreduction with conventional chemotherapy and an additional six month rest period.

 

Overall, the CRADA is an extension and combination of existing NCI and Biovest systems and procedures for cell culture, purification and clinical instrument development. NCI and Biovest staff will undertake the cell fusion, gene sequencing, and purification/conjugation procedures. Combined with Biovest’s existing intellectual property and instrument manufacturing experience, these procedures will be incorporated into a single instrument that can be applied to production and purification of personalized cancer vaccines in a clinica


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more