|
Exhibit
10.12
PUBLIC HEALTH
SERVICE
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
This Cooperative Research and
Development Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the
“CRADA,” consists of this Cover Page, an attached
Agreement, and various Appendices referenced in the Agreement. This
Cover Page serves to identify the Parties to this CRADA:
(1) the following Bureau(s),
Institute(s), Center(s) or Division(s) of the National Institutes
of Health (“NIH”), the Food and Drug Administration
(“FDA”), and the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (“CDC”):
The National Cancer Institute
(“NCI”), hereinafter singly or collectively referred to
as the Public Health Service (“PHS”);
and
(2) Biovest International,
which has offices at 540 Sylvan Avenue, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
07632-3022, hereinafter referred to as the
“Collaborator.”
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 1 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
Article 1.
Introduction
This Cooperative Research and
Development Agreement (CRADA) between PHS and the Collaborator will
be effective when signed by all Parties. The research and
development activities which will be undertaken by each of the
Parties in the course of this CRADA are detailed in the Research
Plan (RP) which is attached as Appendix A. The funding and staffing
commitments of the Parties are set forth in Appendix B. Any
exceptions or changes to the CRADA are set forth in Appendix C.
This CRADA is made under the authority of the Federal Technology
Transfer Act, 15 U.S.C. 3710a and is governed by its
terms.
Article 2. Definitions
As used in this CRADA, the
following terms shall have the indicated meanings:
| 2.1 |
“Affiliate” means any corporation or other
business entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control
with Collaborator. For this purpose, “control” means
direct or indirect beneficial ownership of at least fifty (50)
percent of the voting stock or at least fifty (50) percent interest
in the income of such corporation or other business. |
| 2.2 |
“Cooperative Research and Development Agreement”
or “CRADA” means this Agreement, entered into by
PHS pursuant to the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986, as
amended, 15 U.S.C. 3710a et seq. and Executive Order 12591 of
October 10. 1987. |
| 2.3 |
“Government” means the Government of the
United States as represented through the PHS agency that is a Party
to this agreement. |
| 2.4 |
“IP ” means intellectual property. |
| 2.5 |
“Invention” means any invention or discovery
which is or may be patentable or otherwise protected under title
35, United States Code, or any novel variety or plant which is or
may be protectable under the Plant Variety Protection Act (7 U.S.C.
2321 et seq.). |
| 2.6 |
“Principal Investigator(s)” or
“PIs” means the persons designated respectively
by the Parties to this CRADA who will be responsible for the
scientific and technical conduct of the RP. |
| 2.7 |
“Proprietary/Confidential Information” means
confidential scientific, business, or financial information
provided that such information does not include: |
| |
2.7.1 |
information that is publicly known or available from
other sources who are not under a confidentiality obligation to the
source of the information; |
| |
2.7.2 |
information which has been made available by its owners to
others without a confidentiality obligation; |
| |
2.7.3 |
information which is already known by or available to the
receiving Party without a confidentiality obligation;
or |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 2 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| |
2.7.4 |
information which relates to potential hazards or cautionary
warnings associated with the production, handling or use of the
subject matter of the Research Plan of this CRADA. |
| 2.8 |
“Research Materials” means all tangible
materials other than Subject Data first produced in the
performance of this CRADA. |
| 2.9 |
“Research Plan” or “RP”
means the statement in Appendix A of the respective research and
development commitments of the Parties to this CRADA. |
| 2.10 |
“Subject Invention” means any Invention of
the Parties, conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the
performance of the Research Plan of this CRADA. |
| 2.11 |
“Subject Data” means all recorded
information first produced in the performance of this CRADA by the
Parties. |
Article 3. Cooperative
Research
| 3.1 |
Principal Investigators. PHS research work under this
CRADA will be performed by the PHS laboratory identified in the RP,
and the PHS Principal Investigator (PI) designated in the RP will
be responsible for the scientific and technical conduct of this
project on behalf of PHS. Also designated in the RP is the
Collaborator PI who will be responsible for the scientific and
technical conduct of this project on behalf of the
Collaborator. |
| 3.2 |
Research Plan Change. The RP may be modified by mutual
written consent of the Principal Investigators. Substantial changes
in the scope of the RP will be treated as amendments under Article
13.6. |
Article 4. Reports
| 4.1 |
Interim Reports. The Parties shall exchange formal
written interim progress reports on a schedule agreed to by the
PIs, but at least within twelve (12) months after this CRADA
becomes effective and at least within every twelve (12) months
thereafter. Such reports shall set forth the technical progress
made, identifying such problems as may have been encountered and
establishing goals and objectives requiring further effort, any
modifications to the Research Plan pursuant to Article 3.2, and
identify Subject Inventions pursuant to Article 6.1. |
| 4.2 |
Final Reports. The Parties shall exchange final reports
of their results within four (4) months after completing the
projects described in the RP or after the expiration or termination
of this CRADA. |
Article 5. Financial and Staffing
Obligations
| 5.1 |
PHS and Collaborator Contributions. The contributions of
the Parties, including payment schedules, if applicable, are set
forth in Appendix B. PHS shall not be obligated to perform any of
the research specified herein or to take any other action required
by this CRADA if the funding is not provided as set forth in
Appendix B. PHS shall return excess funds to the Collaborator when
it sends its final fiscal report pursuant to Article 5.2, except
for staffing support pursuant to Article 10.3. Collaborator
acknowledges that the U.S. Government will have the authority to
retain and expend any excess funds for up to one (1) year
subsequent to the expiration or termination of the CRADA to cover
any costs incurred during the term of the CRADA in undertaking the
work set forth in the RP. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 3 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| 5.2 |
Accounting Records. PHS shall maintain separate and
distinct current accounts, records, and other evidence supporting
all its obligations under this CRADA. and shall provide the
Collaborator a final fiscal report pursuant to Article
4.2. |
| 5.3 |
Capital Equipment. Equipment purchased by PHS with funds
provided by the Collaborator shall be the property of PHS. All
capital equipment provided under this CRADA by one party for the
use of another Party remains the property of the providing Party
unless other disposition is mutually agreed upon by in writing by
the Parties. If title to this equipment remains with the providing
Party, that Party is responsible for maintenance of the equipment
and the costs of its transportation to and from the site where it
will be used. |
Article 6. Patent
Applications
| 6.1 |
Reporting. The Parties shall promptly report to each
other in writing each Subject Invention and any patent applications
filed thereon resulting from the research conducted under this
CRADA that is reported to them by their respective employees. Each
Party shall report all Subject Inventions to the other Party in
sufficient detail to determine inventorship. Such reports shall be
treated as Proprietary/Confidential Information in accordance with
Article 8.4. |
| 6.2 |
Filing of Patent Applications. Each party shall be
responsible for filing patent or other IP applications in a timely
manner and at its own expense and after consultation with the other
Party. The Parties will consult and mutually determine a filing
strategy for jointly-owned subject inventions. |
| 6.3 |
Patent Expenses. The expenses attendant to the filing of
patent or other IP applications generally shall be paid by the
Parly filing such application. If an exclusive license to any
Subject Invention is granted to the Collaborator, the Collaborator
shall be responsible for all past and future out-of-pocket expenses
in connection with the preparation, filing, prosecution and
maintenance of any applications claiming such exclusively-licensed
inventions and any patents or other IP grants that may issue on
such applications. The Collaborator may waive its exclusive license
rights on any application, patent or other IP grant at any time,
and incur no subsequent compensation obligation for that
application, patent or IP grant. |
| 6.4 |
Prosecution of Intellectual Property Applications.
Within one month of receipt or filing, each Party shall provide the
other Party with copies of the applications and all documents
received from or filed with the relevant patent or other IP office
in connection with the prosecution of such applications. Each Party
shall also provide the other Party with the power to inspect and
make copies of all documents retained in the patent or other IP
application files by the applicable patent or other IP office.
Where licensing is contemplated by Collaborator, the Parties agree
to consult with each other with respect to the prosecution of
applications for PHS Subject Inventions and joint Subject
Inventions. If the Parties agree that Collaborator shall file and
prosecute IP applications on joint Subject Inventions, then
Collaborator agrees to grant PHS an associate power of attorney (or
its equivalent) on such IP applications. |
Article 7. Licensing
| 7.1 |
Option for
Commercialization License. With respect to Government IP rights
to any Subject Invention not made solely by the
Collaborator’s employees for which a patent or other IP
application is filed, PHS hereby grants to the Collaborator an
exclusive option to elect an exclusive or nonexclusive
commercialization license, which is substantially in the form of
the appropriate model PHS license agreement. This option does not
apply to Subject Inventions conceived prior to the effective date
of this CRADA that are reduced to practice under this CRADA, if
prior to that reduction to practice, PHS has
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 4 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| |
filed a patent application
on the invention and has licensed it or offered to license it to a
third party. The terms of the license will fairly reflect the
nature of the invention, the relative contributions of the Parties
to the invention and the CRADA, the risks incurred by the
Collaborator and the costs of subsequent research and development
needed to bring the invention to the marketplace. The field of use
of the license will be commensurate with the scope of the
RP.
|
| 7.2 |
Exercise of License Option. The option of Article 7.1 must be
exercised by written notice mailed within three (3) months after
either (I) Collaborator receives written notice from PHS that the
patent or other IP application has been filed; or (ii) the date
Collaborator files such IP application. Exercise of this option by
the Collaborator initiates a negotiation period that expires nine
(9) months after the exercise of the option. If the last proposal
by the Collaborator has not been responded to in writing by PHS
within this nine (9) month period, the negotiation period shall be
extended to expire one (1) month after PHS so responds, during
which month the Collaborator may accept in writing the final
license proposal of PHS. In the absence of such acceptance, or an
extension of the time limits by PHS, PHS will be free to license
such IP rights to others. In the event that the Collaborator elects
the option for an exclusive license, but no such license is
executed during the negotiation period, PHS agrees not to make an
offer for an exclusive license on more favorable terms to a third
party for a period of six (6) months without first offering
Collaborator those more favorable terms. These times may be
extended at the sole discretion of PHS upon good cause shown in
writing by the Collaborator. |
| 7.3 |
License for PHS Employee Inventions and Joint Inventions.
Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.’ 3710a(b)(l)(A), for Subject Inventions
made under this CRADA by a PHS employee(s) or jointly by such
employee(s) and employees of the Collaborator and licensed pursuant
to the option of Article 7.1, the Collaborator grants to the
Government a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable, paid-up
license to practice the invention or have the invention practiced
throughout the world by or on behalf of the Government. In the
exercise of such license, the Government shall not publicly
disclose trade secrets or commercial or financial information that
is privileged or confidential within the meaning of 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4) or which would be considered as such if it had been
obtained from a non-Federal party. |
| 7.4 |
License in Collaborator Inventions. Pursuant to 15
U.S.C.’ 3710a(b)(2), for inventions made solely by
Collaborator employees under this CRADA, the Collaborator grants to
the Government a nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable,
paid-up license to practice the invention or have the invention
practiced throughout the world by or on behalf of the Government
for research or other Government purposes. |
| 7.5 |
Third Party License. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C.’
3710a(b)(l)(B), if PHS grants an exclusive license to a Subject
Invention made wholly by PHS employees or jointly with a
Collaborator under this CRADA, the Government shall retain the
right to require the Collaborator to grant to a responsible
applicant a nonexclusive, partially exclusive, or exclusive
sublicense to use the invention in Collaborator=s licensed field of
use on terms that are reasonable under the circumstances; or if the
Collaborator fails to grant such a license, to grant the license
itself. The exercise of such rights by the Government shall only be
in exceptional circumstances and only if the Government determines
(I) the action is necessary to meet health or safety needs that are
not reasonably satisfied by Collaborator, (ii) the action is
necessary to meet requirements for public use specified by Federal
regulations, and such requirements are not reasonably satisfied by
the Collaborator; or (iii) the Collaborator has failed to comply
with an agreement containing provisions described in 15 U.S.C.
3710a(c)(4)(B). The determination made by the Government under this
Article is subject to administrative appeal and judicial review
under 35 U.S.C. 203(2). |
| 7.6 |
Joint
Inventions Not Exclusively Licensed. In the event that the
Collaborator does not acquire an exclusive commercialization
license to IP rights in all fields in joint Subject Inventions then
each Party
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 5 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| |
shall have the right to
use the joint Subject Invention and to license its use to others in
all fields not exclusively licensed to Collaborator. The Parties
may agree to a joint licensing approach for such IP
rights.
|
Article 8. Proprietary Rights and
Publication
| 8.1 |
Right of Access. PHS and the Collaborator agree to
exchange all Subject Data produced in the course of research under
this CRADA. Research Materials will be shared equally by the
Parties to the CRADA unless other disposition is agreed to by the
Parties. All Parties to this CRADA will be free to utilize Subject
Data and Research Materials for their own purposes, consistent with
their obligations under this CRADA. |
| 8.2 |
Ownership of Subject Data and Research Materials.
Subject to the sharing requirements of Paragraph 8.1 and the
regulatory filing requirements of Paragraph 8.3, the producing
Party will retain ownership of and title to all Subject Inventions,
all Subject Data and all Research Materials produced solely by
their investigators. Jointly developed Subject Inventions, Subject
Data and Research Materials will be jointly owned. |
| 8.3 |
Dissemination of Subject Data and Research Materials. To
the extent permitted by law, the Collaborator and PHS agree to use
reasonable efforts to keep Subject Data and Research Materials
confidential until published or until corresponding patent
applications are filed. Any information that would identify human
subjects of research or patients will always be maintained
confidentially. To the extent permitted by law, the Collaborator
shall have the exclusive right to use any and all CRADA Subject
Data in and for any regulatory filing by or on behalf of
Collaborator, except that PHS shall have the exclusive right to use
Subject Data for that purpose, and authorize others to do so, if
the CRADA is terminated or if Collaborator abandons its
commercialization efforts. Collaborator acknowledges the basic
research mission of the PHS, and agrees that after publication, PHS
may make unpatented research materials arising out of this CRADA
available to third parties for further research. |
| 8.4 |
Proprietary/Confidential Information. Each Party agrees
to limit its disclosure of Proprietary/Confidential Information to
the amount necessary to carry out the Research Plan of this CRADA,
and shall place a confidentiality notice on all such information.
Confidential oral communications shall be reduced to writing within
30 days by the disclosing Party. Each Party receiving
Proprietary/Confidential Information agrees that any information so
designated shall be used by it only for the purposes described in
the attached Research Plan. Any Party may object to the designation
of information as Proprietary/Confidential Information by another
Party. Subject Data and Research Materials developed solely by the
Collaborator may be designated as Proprietary/Confidential
Information when they are wholly separable from the Subject Data
and Research Materials developed jointly with PHS investigators,
and advance designation of such data and material categories is set
forth in the RP. The exchange of other confidential information,
e.g., patient-identifying data, should be similarly limited and
treated. Jointly developed Subject Data and Research Material
derived from the Research Plan may be disclosed by Collaborator to
a third party under a confidentiality agreement for the purpose of
possible sublicensing pursuant to the Licensing Agreement and
subject to Article 8.7. |
| 8.5 |
Protection
of Proprietary/Confidential Information.
Proprietary/Confidential Information shall not be disclosed,
copied, reproduced or otherwise made available to any other person
or entity without the consent of the owning Party except as
required under court order or the Freedom of Information Act
(5 U.S.C. ‘ 552). Each Party agrees to use its best
efforts to maintain the confidentiality of Proprietary/Confidential
Information. Each Party agrees that the other Party is not liable
for the disclosure of Proprietary/Confidential Information which,
after notice to and consultation with the concerned Party,
the
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 6 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| |
other Party in possession of
the Proprietary/Confidential Information determines may not be
lawfully withheld, provided the concerned Party has been given an
opportunity to seek a court order to enjoin disclosure.
|
| 8.6 |
Duration of Confidentiality Obligation. The obligation
to maintain the confidentiality of Proprietary/Confidential
Information shall expire at the earlier of the date when the
information is no longer Proprietary Information as defined in
Article 2.7 or three (3) years after the expiration or termination
date of this CRADA . The Collaborator may request an
extension to this term when necessary to protect
Proprietary/Confidential Information relating to products not yet
commercialized. |
| 8.7 |
Publication. The Parties are encouraged to make publicly
available the results of their research. Before either Party
submits a paper or abstract for publication or otherwise intends to
publicly disclose information about a Subject Invention, Subject
Data or Research Materials, the other Party shall be provided
thirty (30) days to review the proposed publication or disclosure
to assure that Proprietary/Confidential Information is protected.
The publication or other disclosure shall be delayed for up to
thirty (30) additional days upon written request by any Party as
necessary to preserve U.S. or foreign patent or other IP
rights. |
Article 9. Representations and
Warranties
| 9.1 |
Representations and Warranties of PHS. PHS hereby
represents and warrants to the Collaborator that the official
signing this CRADA has authority to do so. |
| 9.2 |
Representations and Warranties of the
Collaborator. |
(a) The Collaborator hereby
represents and warrants to PHS that the Collaborator has the
requisite power and authority to enter into this CRADA and to
perform according to its terms, and that the Collaborator’s
official signing this CRADA has authority to do so. The
Collaborator further represents that it is financially able to
satisfy any funding commitments made in Appendix B.
(b) The Collaborator
certifies that the statements herein are true, complete, and
accurate to the best of its knowledge. The Collaborator is aware
that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may
subject it to criminal, civil, or administrative
penalties.
Article 10.
Termination
| 10.1 |
Termination By Mutual Consent. PHS and the Collaborator
may terminate this CRADA, or portions thereof, at any time by
mutual written consent. In such event the Parties shall specify the
disposition of all property, inventions, patent or other IP
applications and other results of work accomplished or in progress,
arising from or performed under this CRADA, all in accordance with
the rights granted to the Parties under the terms of this
Agreement. |
| 10.2 |
Unilateral Termination. Either PHS or the Collaborator
may unilaterally terminate this entire CRADA at any time by giving
written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the desired
termination date, and any rights accrued in property, patents or
other IP rights shall be disposed of as provided in paragraph 10.1,
except that PHS may, at its option, retain funds transferred to PHS
prior to unilateral termination by Collaborator for use in
completing the Research Plan solely or with another
partner. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 7 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| 10.3 |
Staffing. If this CRADA is mutually or unilaterally
terminated prior to its expiration, funds will nevertheless remain
available to PHS for continuing any staffing commitment made by the
Collaborator pursuant to Article 5.1 above and Appendix B, if
applicable, for a period of six (6) months after such termination.
If there are insufficient funds to cover this expense, the
Collaborator agrees to pay the difference. |
| 10.4 |
New Commitments. No Party shall make new
commitments related to this CRADA after a mutual termination or
notice of a unilateral termination and shall, to the extent
feasible, cancel all outstanding commitments and contracts by the
termination date. |
| 10.5 |
Termination Costs. Concurrently with the exchange of
final reports pursuant to Articles 4.2 and 5.2, PHS shall submit to
the Collaborator for payment a statement of all costs incurred
prior to the date of termination and for all reasonable termination
costs including the cost of returning Collaborator property or
removal of abandoned property, for which Collaborator shall be
responsible. |
Article 11. Disputes
| 11.1 |
Settlement. Any dispute arising under this CRADA which
is not disposed of by agreement of the Principal Investigators
shall be submitted jointly to the signatories of this CRADA. If the
signatories are unable to jointly resolve the dispute within thirty
(30) days after notification thereof, the Assistant Secretary for
Health (or his/her designee or successor) shall propose a
resolution. Nothing in this Article shall prevent any Party from
pursuing any additional administrative remedies that may be
available and, after exhaustion of such administrative remedies,
pursuing all available judicial remedies. |
| 11.2 |
Continuation of Work. Pending the resolution of any
dispute or claim pursuant to this Article, the Parties agree that
performance of all obligations shall be pursued diligently in
accordance with the direction of the PHS signatory. |
Article 12. Liability
| 12.1 |
Property. The U.S. Government shall not be responsible
for damages to any Collaborator property provided to PHS, where
Collaborator retains title to the property, or any property
acquired by Collaborator for its own use pursuant to this
CRADA. |
| 12.2 |
NO WARRANTIES. EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY STATED IN ARTICLE
9, THE PARTIES MAKE NO EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY AS TO ANY MATTER
WHATSOEVER, INCLUDING THE CONDITIONS OF THE RESEARCH OR ANY
INVENTION OR PRODUCT, WHETHER TANGIBLE OR INTANGIBLE, MADE, OR
DEVELOPED UNDER THIS CRADA, OR THE OWNERSHIP, MERCHANTABILITY, OR
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF THE RESEARCH OR ANY INVENTION
OR PRODUCT. |
| 12.3 |
Indemnification. The Collaborator agrees to hold the
U.S. Government harmless and to indemnify the Government for all
liabilities, demands, damages, expenses and losses arising out of
the use by the Collaborator for any purpose of the Subject Data,
Research Materials and/or Subject Inventions produced in whole or
part by PHS employees under this CRADA, unless due to the
negligence or willful misconduct of PHS, its employees, or agents.
The Collaborator shall be liable for any claims or damages it
incurs in connection with this CRADA. PHS has no authority to
indemnify the Collaborator. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 8 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| 12.4 |
Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be liable for any
unforeseeable event beyond its reasonable control not caused by the
fault or negligence of such Party, which causes such Party to be
unable to perform its obligations under this CRADA, and which it
has been unable to overcome by the exercise of due diligence. In
the event of the occurrence of such a force majeure event,
the Party unable to perform shall promptly notify the other Party.
It shall further use its best efforts to resume performance as
quickly as possible and shall suspend performance only for such
period of time as is necessary as a result of the force
majeure event. |
Article 13.
Miscellaneous
| 13.1 |
Governing Law. The construction, validity, performance
and effect of this CRADA shall be governed by Federal law, as
applied by the Federal Courts in the District of Columbia. Federal
law and regulations will preempt any conflicting or inconsistent
provisions in this CRADA. |
| 13.2 |
Entire Agreement. This CRADA constitutes the entire
agreement between the Parties concerning the subject matter of this
CRADA and supersedes any prior understanding or written or oral
agreement. |
| 13.3 |
Headings. Titles and headings of the articles and
subarticles of this CRADA are for convenient reference only, do not
form a part of this CRADA, and shall in no way affect its
interpretation. The PHS component that is the Party for all
purposes of this CRADA is the Bureau(s), Institute(s), Center(s) or
Division(s) listed on the Cover Page herein. |
| 13.4 |
Waivers. None of the provisions of this CRADA shall be
considered waived by any Party unless such waiver is given in
writing to the other Party. The failure of a Party to insist upon
strict performance of any of the terms and conditions hereof, or
failure or delay to exercise any rights provided herein or by law,
shall not be deemed a waiver of any rights of any
Party. |
| 13.5 |
Severability. The illegality or invalidity of any
provisions of this CRADA shall not impair, affect, or invalidate
the other provisions of this CRADA. |
| 13.6 |
Amendments. If either Party desires a modification to
this CRADA, the Parties shall, upon reasonable notice of the
proposed modification or extension by the Party desiring the
change, confer in good faith to determine the desirability of such
modification or extension. Such modification shall not be effective
until a written amendment is signed by the signatories to this
CRADA or by their representatives duly authorized to execute such
amendment. |
| 13.7 |
Assignment. Neither this CRADA nor any rights or
obligations of any Party hereunder shall be assigned or otherwise
transferred by either Party without the prior written consent of
the other Party. |
| 13.8 |
Notices. All notices pertaining to or required by this
CRADA shall be in writing and shall be signed by an authorized
representative and shall be delivered by hand or sent by certified
mail, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, to the
addresses indicated on the signature page for each Party. Notices
regarding the exercise of license options shall be made pursuant to
Article 7.2. Any Party may change such address by notice given to
the other Party in the manner set forth above. |
| 13.9 |
Independent Contractors. The relationship of the Parties
to this CRADA is that of independent contractors and not agents of
each other or joint venturers or partners. Each Party shall
maintain sole and exclusive control over its personnel and
operations. Collaborator employees who will be working at PHS
facilities may be asked to sign a Guest Researcher or Special
Volunteer Agreement appropriately modified in view of the terms of
this CRADA. |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 9 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
| 13.10 |
Use of Name or Endorsements . By entering into this
CRADA. PHS does not directly or indirectly endorse any product or
service provided, or to be provided, whether directly or indirectly
related to either this CRADA or to any patent or other IP license
or agreement which implements this CRADA by its successors,
assignees, or licensees. The Collaborator shall not in any way
state or imply that this CRADA is an endorsement of any such
product or service by the U.S. Government or any of its
organizational units or employees. Collaborator issued press
releases that reference or rely upon the work of PHS under this
CRADA shall be made available to PHS at least 7 days prior to
publication for review and comment. |
| 13.11 |
Exceptions to this CRADA. Any exceptions or
modifications to this CRADA that are agreed to by the Panics prior
to their execution of this CRADA are set forth in Appendix
C. |
| 13.12 |
Reasonable Consent. Whenever a Party’s consent or
permission is required under this CRADA, such consent or permission
shall not be unreasonably withheld. |
Article 14. Duration of
Agreement
| 14.1 |
Duration. It is mutually recognized that the duration of
this project cannot be rigidly defined in advance, and that the
contemplated time periods for various phases of the RP are only
good faith guidelines subject to adjustment by mutual agreement to
fit circumstances as the RP proceeds. In no case will the term of
this CRADA extend beyond the term indicated in the RP unless it is
revised in accordance with Article 13.6. |
| 14.2 |
Survivability. The provisions of Articles 4.2, 5-8,
10.3-10.5, 11.1, 12.2-12.4, 13.1, 13.10 and 14.2 shall survive the
termination of this CRADA. |
SIGNATURES BEGIN ON THE
NEXT PAGE
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 10 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR PHS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alan Ralsor
|
|
|
|
8/30/01
|
|
Alan Ralsor, M.D.
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Deputy Director, NCI
|
|
|
|
|
Mailing Address for Notices:
National Cancer
Institute-Frederick
Technology Transfer Branch
1003 West Seventh Street, Suite
502
Frederick MD 21701
Phone: 301-846-5465
FAX: 301-846-6820
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR THE COLLABORATOR:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Christopher Kyriakides
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Date
|
| |
|
|
|
Mailing Address for Notices:
Biovest International, Inc.
8500 Evergreen Boulevard
Minneapolis MN 55433
763-786-0302
763-786-0915
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Page 11 of 11 |
|
CONFIDENTIAL |
APPENDIX A
RESEARCH
PLAN
Clinical Development of
Hybridoma-Based Idiotypic Vaccines for
Treatment of Follicular
B-Cell Lymphoma
NCI Principal
Investigator(s)
Larry W. Kwak, M.D.,
Ph.D.
Center for Cancer Research
(CCR)
National Cancer Institute
(NCI)
Collaborator Principal
Investigator(s)
Christopher Kyriakides, M.D.,
FAAPMR
Chief Executive
Officer
Biovest International,
Inc.
Term of CRADA
Eight (8) years from the date
of the final CRADA signature.
A Letter of Intent (LOI) for
this CRADA was executed
by and between the Parties on
January 9, 2001.
An Extension to the LOI was
executed by and between
the Parties on June 25,
2001
GOALS OF THIS CRADA
The goal of this project is to develop
an efficacious hybridoma-based idiotype vaccine to produce
long-term disease-free survival in follicular B-cell lymphoma
patients who have attained a complete clinical response from
chemotherapy and to compile data required to support a Biological
License Application (BLA) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) for hybridoma-based idiotype follicular B-cell lymphoma
vaccine.
The Center for Cancer Research (CCR),
National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Collaborator shall work
together toward the successful development of the hybridoma-based
idiotype vaccine as a safe and effective novel anti-cancer
treatment for follicular B-cell lymphoma. The CCR will work closely
with Collaborator to obtain and evaluate the clinical data that may
be required to allow Collaborator to obtain regulatory approval by
the FDA. Collaborator will provide expertise in the development,
formulation and Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) production of the
vaccine. Additionally, CCR will work with Collaborator in the
ongoing clinical trial planned under this CRADA as well as all
regulatory aspects and the BLA filings necessary for Collaborator
to obtain marketing approval.
The scope of this CRADA includes the
development of the processes required for large-scale GMP
production of adequate numbers of GMP-produced and formulated
idiotype vaccines-to complete the clinical development of this
treatment for follicular B-Cell lymphoma. This vaccine strategy
involves the use of an immunological adjuvant,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), which is
currently being provided to NCI for this study under a Clinical
Trial Agreement with Immunex.
BACKGROUND
INTRODUCTION
Current Treatment of Indolent Follicular
Lymphomas
The indolent follicular lymphomas (FL)
are follicular small-cleaved cell (FSC) and follicular mixed
lymphoma (FM). Stage I and II patients comprise only 10% to 15% of
all cases of follicular lymphomas and are best managed with
radiation therapy. Eighty-five percent of patients with follicular
lymphomas present with stage III or IV disease. The optimal
management of these patients remains controversial and has
generally followed two divergent approaches (1, 2). An aggressive
approach, which has included radiation therapy, combination
chemotherapy, or combined modality therapy; and a conservative
approach that involves no initial treatment followed by a
single-agent chemotherapy or involved-field radiotherapy when
required (3, 4). Most forms of systemic therapy have the capacity
to produce high complete response rates. However, they have failed
to produce long-term disease-free survival or to prolong overall
survival; thus, it has become clear that the vast majority of
patients with this disease will relapse and die of their lymphoma,
despite its usually indolent course.
Technology
Summary
The development of a vaccine against
human malignancies has been a long-sought goal, which has yet to be
achieved. Many of the efforts toward this end have been frustrated
by the lack of identification of a tumor-specific antigen which
would allow tumor cells to be distinguished from normal cells.
Conceptually, such an antigen could be used as a vaccine to induce
the host’s immune system to reject cells bearing that
antigen.
Immunoglobulin (Ig) molecules are
composed of heavy and light chains, which possess highly specific
variable regions at their amino termini. The variable regions of
heavy and light chains combine to form the unique
antigen-recognition site of the Ig protein. These variable regions
contain determinants that can themselves be recognized as antigens,
or idiotypes . B-cell malignancies are composed of clonal
proliferations of cells synthesizing a single antibody molecule
with unique variable regions in the heavy and light chains. B-cell
lymphomas are neoplasms of mature resting and reactive lymphocytes,
which generally express synthesized Ig on the cell surface.
The idiotypic determinants of the surface Ig of a B-cell lymphoma
can thus serve as a tumor-specific marker for the malignant
clone.
Studies in experimental animals, as well
as in man, have demonstrated the utility of the Ig idiotype as a
tumor-specific antigen (5, 6). Lynch and Eisen were the first to
demonstrate that active immunization against idiotypic determinants
on malignant B cells could produce resistance to tumor growth, and
this phenomenon of idiotype tumor resistance has been reproduced
subsequently in a number of syngeneic experimental tumor models, as
well as specific anti-tumor therapy against established tumors
(7-16). These results, taken together, provided the rationale for
testing autologous tumor-derived idiotypic surface Ig (Id) as a
therapeutic “vaccine” against human B-cell
lymphoma.
Summary of Previous Clinical Studies
Sponsored by NCI
Phase 1 Clinical
Trial.
Kwak et al. first immunized
human patients with B-cell lymphoma with autologous Id protein
(17). The Id-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Id-KLH) was emulsified in a
Pluronic polymer-based adjuvant vehicle formulation. Ultimately,
approximately 40 patients were treated on this protocol. Because
the study population was heterogeneous, it was not designed to
answer the question of anti-tumor efficacy. Rather, this first
study assessed the question of immunogenicity; i.e., is it even
possible to immunize a patient against a self-tumor antigen? In
this context, this study was important, because it demonstrated
that patients with B-cell lymphoma could be induced to make
primarily idiotype-specific antibody responses, but with little
evidence for T-cell immunity.
Improving the potency of
the Id-KLH Vaccine.
At the NCI, the objective of
Id vaccine development has been to further optimize the
immunogenicity of this vaccine. To this end, NCI focused on the use
of novel immunological adjuvants, which were 1), more potent and 2)
more effective in the induction of cell-mediated immune responses,
particularly CD8+ T-cells, compared with the pluronic polymer-based
adjuvant used in the pilot study.
As a preclinical aim, Kwak et
al. utilized a murine B cell tumor as a model system in which to
screen promising immunological adjuvants. A number of these
included cytokines, and among these, GM-CSF emerged as a promising
adjuvant for idiotypic Ig antigen (18).
The results demonstrated that
the augmented survival benefit afforded by immunization with
relevant Id-KLH alone could significantly enhanced by the addition
of GM-CSF at either the 100 or 10,000 unit dose. A curious but
reproducible observation was the loss of this protective effect at
a higher dose of GM-CSF of 50,000 units. These data suggest that
GM-CSF may have a potent adjuvant effect in vivo for Id-KLH
antigen, especially at relatively low doses.
Furthermore, T-cell subset
depletion experiments demonstrated that effector CD8+ T-cells were
required for anti-tumor immunity.
Phase 2 Clinical
Trial.
Based on the findings of this
preclinical study, the NCI sponsored a Phase 2 clinical study to
evaluate the ability of this new idiotype vaccine to elicit
tumor-specific T-cell immunity, as measured by the ability of
patient T cells to specifically lyse their own tumor cells in
vitro, and to exert antitumor effects as measured by the
elimination of t(14; 18)-bearing cells from the peripheral blood of
uniformly treated FL patients in first CR (complete remission).
Patients in this study were previously untreated and received a
uniform chemotherapy regimen, PACE; Prednisone, Adriamycin,
Cytoxan, and Etoposide. (modified ProMACE without methotrexate). By
design, therefore, they comprised a very homogeneous patient
population in a minimal residual disease state. Of 35 patients, 23
(66%) achieved CR by standard clinical criteria. One of the
patients was lost to analysis because of early relapse within six
months, and two were excluded because a vaccine could not be made.
This left a total study group of 20 patients in CR. Six to 15
months after completion of chemotherapy, these 20 patients were
treated with a series of five monthly vaccinations with autologous
FL Ig protein (0.5 mg) conjugated to KLH, together with local
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, 100 or
500 mcg/m2) subcutaneously (19).
Eighteen of 20 patients
remain in continuous, first complete remission (median: 42+ months
from completion of chemotherapy, range: 28+ to 53+). UPN 9 and 14
relapsed at 15 and 7 months after completion of vaccine therapy,
respectively. UPN 9 had never cleared the t(14; 18)-bearing cells
from the peripheral blood; UPN 14 did not have the MBR
rearrangement and thus, molecular CR status could not be
established.
The rationale for a pivotal,
randomized trial, which is the subject of this CRADA is thus based
on three independent results from this completed Phase 2 study: (1)
tumor-specific CD8+ T-cell responses (cytotoxicity against
autologous FL targets and cytokine production) were seen in 17 of
20 (85%) vaccinated patients, (2) 8 of 11 (73%) patients sampled
after completion of vaccination converted to PCR negative and have
maintained both PCR negativity and clinical CR, and (3) with a
median follow-up of 36+ months after completion of chemotherapy
(range 22+ to 47+ months), 18 of 20 (90%) patients remain in
continuous clinical CR.
Taken together, these data
suggest that idiotype vaccination can elicit a tumor-specific
response that is associated with clearance of residual tumor cells
from the blood in the majority of patients with FL. It remains to
be determined whether molecular CR is associated with prolonged
disease-free survival. However, this systematic analysis of
molecular response rate provides the first evidence for an
anti-tumor effect of vaccination. Finally, this study established
GM-CSF as an essential component of the vaccine strategy,
particularly for induction of CD8+ T-cell responses.
CCR, NCI
Dr. Kwak and his group pioneered the
first human studies of vaccines for B-cell malignancies. Dr
Kwak’s group has a broad range of scientific and clinical
interests spanning tumor immunology, adoptive T cell therapy, and
management of lymphomas and myelomas.
Specific work in his laboratory is
focused on studies of immunobiology and immunotherapy of
hematological malignancies. The laboratory’s principal
objective is to obtain conclusive proof for the cancer vaccine
concept; i.e., simply that it is possible to induce an immune
response against a self protein, which is inherently poorly
immunogenic, in human cancer patients. The goals for vaccine
development are: (1) to increase the potency of vaccine
formulations, and (2) to develop formulations which are more
effective in activating the cellular arm of the immune response.
The working hypothesis is that achieving the eventual goal of
demonstrating clinical efficacy will depend on the ability of
vaccines to elicit sustained, potent cell-mediated
responses.
The current clinical trial of Id
vaccination in previously untreated patients with follicular
lymphomas initiated by the laboratory, which is the subject of this
CRADA, features a new formulation of the prototype Id-KLH conjugate
vaccine using GM-CSF as a potent immunological adjuvant. CD8+ T
cell responses, capable of lysing autologous tumor targets, and
molecular remissions have been observed in the vast majority of
vaccinated patients.
BIOVEST INTERNATIONAL
INC.
INTRODUCTION
The proprietary technology of Biovest
(hollow fiber bioreactor instrumentation) that will be applied
under this CRADA utilizes a patented process that optimizes fluid
flow dynamics within perfused bioreactors to maintain high cell
densities and continuously harvest secreted protein for extended
periods of time. An experienced team of mechanical, electrical,
software and biochemical engineers was established at Biovest to
develop this technology. As a result of these efforts, the company
gained significant expertise in the large-scale application of cGMP
mammalian cell culture, which has subsequently been applied to a
wide variety of cell lines for hollow fiber bioreactor production
of recombinant or fusion based proteins. Combined with this
existing expertise, a cGMP process will be developed that will be
designed to facilitate commercial application of patient-specific
vaccines.
Biovest’s cell culture expertise
was recognized when the National Center for Research Resources,
NIH, awarded the National Cell Culture Center to Biovest. This
research resource facility was awarded to Biovest in 1990 through a
competitive five-year Cooperative Agreement Award, which has been
renewed twice, currently funded through September 2005 This
resource was created to provide the biomedical research community
with subsidized access to professional large-scale cell culture
services. During that time, Biovest has received hundreds of cell
lines from academic investigators within many major research
institutions in the United States, for the purpose of large-scale
production. The majority of these lines are hybridoma, transfected
or chimeric lines, created for the production of
immunoglobulin.
In addition, for the past ten years,
Biovest has provided contract services to biotechnology and
pharmaceutical companies for use in clinical (cGMP) applications,
produced in isolation suites within Biovest’s manufacturing
facility. For the vast majority of these cell lines, automated
hollow fiber bioreactor instrumentation is utilized for protein
production. Biovest instrumentation, combined with years of process
development experience for high-cell density perfusion culture, is
one principal advantage of Biovest’s contract laboratory.
This ability to modify hardware and understand the biochemical
aspects of high-density culture has allowed us to develop
successfully many processes unique to large-scale culture, which
are typically incorporated into cGMP manufacture of the final
product. Currently, a documentation system exists that addresses
cGMP production requirements for
numerous specialized cell lines and
processes with hollow fiber bioreactor technology in a multi-use
facility. .
Similar to cGMP cell culture procedures,
the existing instrumentation was developed as a Class I medical
device, suitable for clinical application. This experience will be
an important asset to the development and large-scale manufacture
of instrumentation that can be applied to vaccine
production.
Biovest International, Inc. (formerly
Cellex Biosciences) is a leading manufacturer of hollow fiber
bioreactor instrumentation and contract production services
worldwide. In 1984, the corporation began development of
instrumentation that automated the culture of mammalian cells on a
large scale. Subsequently, the company utilized this hollow fiber
bioreactor technology to create a cGMP production process that
accommodates economic production of large amounts of specific
cell-secreted protein (e.g. monoclonal antibodies) from numerous
cell lines within one facility. During the past two decades,
Biovest has developed a range of hollow fiber bioreactor
instruments to address production at the research level through
large-scale pharmaceutical needs. This patented technology is now
widely accepted by numerous biotechnology and pharmaceutical
companies throughout the world. As a result, Biovest, with
perfusion cell culture methodology (hollow fiber bioreactor),
offers a well-defined cGMP approach to large-scale commercial
production of clinical and pharmaceutical grade
proteins.
In December 1999, Biovest was awarded a
contract with NCI to produce idiotype (antibody) as crude
supernatant from heteromyeloma patient cell lines, created in Dr.
Kwak’s laboratory. This idiotype was subsequently used to
create the Id-keyhole limpet hemocyanin (Id-KLH) lymphoma vaccine
for study in an ongoing Phase 3 clinical trial, which is the
subject of this CRADA. Creation of this vaccine is extremely labor
intensive and Biovest, along with Dr. Kwak, recognized that
commercial application would ultimately be dependent on research
and development of a simplified or automated process. As such,
Biovest responded to an NCI CRADA announcement and proposed a
collaboration toward this end. Biovest will leverage its cell
culture, purification, and clinical instrument expertise to
facilitate production and commercialization of the idiotype tumor
vaccine for B-cell lymphoma. Under the CRADA, a process and
accompanying automated technology will be designed to produce and
purify idiotype from each patient-specific cell line, both rapidly
and cost effectively in a cGMP environment. Biovest recognizes that
this patient-specific approach is dependent on technology designed
to address these needs. Unlike conventional biologicals or drugs,
which benefit from mass production or economy of scale, this new
technology will be designed with the aim of allowing thousands of
patient-specific vaccines to be manufactured efficiently each
year.
Work Under this CRADA: The Phase 3
Clinical Trial.
To definitively answer the question of
clinical efficacy, the NCI opened a multi-institutional,
controlled, randomized Phase 3 clinical trial in January 2000 under
the auspices of the NCI Vaccine Working Group and with support from
the Office of the Director. Given the fact that no cancer vaccine
has been licensed for use in the United States, designing this
trial as a scientifically rigorous test of the cancer vaccine
hypothesis, with scientific proof of principle as the primary
objective, was felt to be paramount. Therefore, no changes in the
key variables were (or will be) considered. Specifically, the
design of the study remains identical to that of the Phase 2 study.
Specifically, only patients with previously untreated lymphoma of
follicular types are eligible, all patients receive uniform PACE
chemotherapy, and vaccination is therefore administered to a
homogeneous group of patients in first complete remission.
Importantly, the vaccine formulation is also identical to that used
in the Phase 2 trial, using the same hybridoma fusion technology to
generate the vaccine, and using the same dose, schedule, and route
of
vaccine administration. A multi-center
consortium of clinical sites has been assembled, including
Northwestern University, University of Pennsylvania, Duke
University, Moffitt Cancer Center, and the NIH Clinical Center with
additional sites under consideration. As of March 2001,
approximately 50 patients have been enrolled on this study, which
is currently being sponsored under NCI Investigational New Drug
Application (IND) 5427.
The trial is anticipated to enroll a
total of 563 patients, approximately 2/3 of whom are expected to
achieve a clinical complete remission from PACE chemotherapy.
Patients achieving a complete remission are randomized to begin
treatment with either a specific vaccine consisting of Id-KLH +
GM-CSF, or non-specific vaccine consisting of KLH + GM-CSF, in a
2:1 ratio (in favor of specific vaccine) starting six months after
completion of chemotherapy.
This trial anticipates accrual over five
years, and because of the long natural history of follicular
lymphoma, an additional three years of follow-up time is projected
to observe at least a 20% improvement in disease-free survival
(study endpoint) for the experimental group.
The achievement of scientific proof of
concept remains the primary objective of this Phase 3 trial. The
addition of a CRADA partner will allow the data from this trial to
be put together in support of a BLA with the FDA, which is
necessary to help bring this vaccine to market. Furthermore, the
CRADA partner’s contribution of intellectual property will
allow for development of an automated system for the practical
production of a vaccine to be brought to market and fulfill a
currently unmet public health need. Finally, the addition of a
corporate partner may make it possible to accelerate patient
accrual in order to complete the trial and provide data necessary
to support a BLA with the FDA in a shorter period of
time.
Production of Id Vaccines
.
Since Id is a clonal marker unique to
each lymphoma, vaccines must be produced on an individualized basis
for each patient. The strategy used to isolate immunogloblin from
the surfaces of human B-cell lymphomas consists of performing a
hybridization between the lymphoma cell and a modified, mouse/human
heteromyeloma cell that grows in vitro and that has the
cellular machinery to synthesize and secrete large quantities of
immunoglobulin. Such myeloma fusion partners have been engineered
not to secrete any immunoglobulin of their own; therefore, the
immunoglobulin that is secreted following fusion is derived purely
from the human tumor.
The production of Id protein begins with
the isolation of malignant cells from tumor biopsy specimens, most
commonly involved lymph nodes, although tumor cells isolated from
peripheral blood, bone marrow or spleen can be used. The minimal
starting material consists of about 75 million tumor cells. These
cells are then fused with a hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine
(HAT) - sensitive fusion partner, and hybridomas selected in HAT
medium that secrete immuoglobulin with the type of heavy and light
chains corresponding to the known immunophenotype of the tumor
specimen are identified. This is vaccine production process step
1.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
amplification of the immunoglobulin variable region genes from both
the hybridoma and the primary tumor specimen are performed, and the
sequences are compared to establish the identify of the secreted
immunoglobulin. This is vaccine production step 2.
Heterohybridomas identified in this way
are expanded. This is vaccine production process step 3.
Id protein is the purified from
collected culture supernatants by affinity chromatography depending
on the isotype of the lymphoma immunoglobulin. Each idiotype
protein is then conjugated to KLH. These two processes are
collectively referred to as vaccine production process step
4.
This Id-conjugate is then used to
immunize the patient from whose tumor it was originally
isolated.
Vaccine production process Steps 1-2 are
currently performed in Dr. Kwak’s laboratory at
NCI-Frederick. Vaccine production process Step 3 is presently being
conducted at Biovest under the Letter of Intent to this CRADA
between Biovest and NCI executed January 9, 2001, and Step 4 is
being performed under contract with Charles River Discovery &
Development Services (CRDDC), Rockville, MD through Science
Applications International Corporation (SAIC), a contractor in the
Government-Owned, Contractor Operated (GOCO) facility at
NCI-Frederick . While currently performed in Dr. Kwak’s
laboratory at NCI, the technology for heterohybridoma fusion and
selection and PCR sequencing will be transferred and optimized for
GMP production at Biovest International. As noted above, the
ultimate goal of this CRADA is to fully develop the technology
allowing optimized Id vaccine production under GMP conditions that
would be necessary for FDA approval for human clinical use. As part
of that goal, NCI and Biovest will investigate the automation of
this stepwise production of Id vaccines using Biovest’s
proprietary instrument.
Under optimal conditions, approximately
three months are required for production of the final product. This
time period does not constitute a limitation, as the vaccine
administration occurs following six to eight months of
cytoreduction with conventional chemotherapy and an additional six
month rest period.
Overall, the CRADA is an extension and
combination of existing NCI and Biovest systems and procedures for
cell culture, purification and clinical instrument development. NCI
and Biovest staff will undertake the cell fusion, gene sequencing,
and purification/conjugation procedures. Combined with
Biovest’s existing intellectual property and instrument
manufacturing experience, these procedures will be incorporated
into a single instrument that can be applied to production and
purification of personalized cancer vaccines in a
clinica
|