GOVERNING AGREEMENT AND COMPLETE
RELEASES
This is a
Governing Agreement and Complete Releases (the “Governing
Agreement”) by and between:
Koninklijke
Philips Electronics N.V. (“Philips N.V.”), Philips
Electronics North America Corporation (“PENAC”) and
Philips Solid-State Lighting Solutions, Inc. (“PSSLS”;
together with Philips N.V. and PENAC, “Philips”), on
the one hand; and,
Lighting
Science Group Corporation (“LSG”), LED Holdings, LLC
(“LEH”) and LED Effects, Inc. (“LEI”;
together with LSG and LEH, the “LED Group”);
and Pegasus
Capital Advisors, L.P. (“Pegasus Capital”) and Pegasus
Partners IV, L.P. (“Pegasus Partners”; together with
Pegasus Capital, “Pegasus”), on the other.
A. PENAC and
LEI entered into an Agreement for Use and Disclosure of
Confidential Technical and/or Business Information, dated
February 23, 2006 (the “2006 Confidentiality
Agreement”);
B. PENAC and
LEI entered into a Joint Development Agreement, dated as of
March 14, 2006 (the “JDA”);
C. PENAC and
LEI entered into a Common Interest Agreement, dated
December 16, 2006 (the “Common Interest
Agreement”);
D. PENAC and
LEI entered into a Distributor Agreement, dated January 27,
2007 (the “Distributor Agreement”);
E. PENAC and
LEI entered into a Value Added Reseller Agreement, dated
February 2, 2007 (the “VAR Agreement”);
F. LEI, Philips
N.V. and Pegasus Capital entered into a letter agreement, dated
February 14, 2007 (the “LOI”);
G. Pegasus
Capital and Philips N.V. entered into an agreement, dated
March 15, 2007 (the “IP Due Diligence Confidentiality
Agreement”);
H. Philips owns
certain intellectual property and/or trade secrets related to LED
lighting, including, but not limited to, U.S. Patent Numbers
6,788,011, 6,150,774, 6,806,659, 6,016,038, 7,221,104, 6,967,448
and 6,250,774 (collectively, “Philips IP”);
I. The LED
Group owns certain intellectual property and/or trade secrets
related to LED lighting (collectively, “LED Group
IP”);
J. On
February 19, 2008, Philips Solid-State Lighting Solutions,
Inc. filed a Complaint against the LED Group in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Massachusetts, captioned
Page 1 of 10
Philips
Solid-State Lighting Solutions, Inc., et al.
v. Lighting Science Group Corp.,
et al. , No. 08-CV-10289-RWZ (the “First
Massachusetts Action”);
K. On
March 7, 2008, the LED Group filed a Complaint against Philips
in the Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, captioned
Lighting Science Group Corp., et al. v. Koninklijke
Philips Electronics, N.V., et al. , No. 34-2008-5454 (the
“California Action”);
L. On
March 14, 2008, Pegasus Partners filed a Complaint against
Philips in Texas District Court, County of Dallas, captioned
Pegasus Partners IV, L.P . v. Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V., et al. , No. 08-2848 (the “Texas
Action”);
M. On
April 11, 2008, Philips filed a Complaint against Pegasus in
the Supreme Court of New York, County of New York, captioned
Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., et al. v. Pegasus
Capital Advisors, L.P., et al. , No. 601090/08 (the
“New York Action”);
N. On
September 24, 2008, LSG filed a Complaint against U.S. Philips
Corporation in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
California, captioned Lighting Science Group Corporation v.
U.S. Philips Corporation , No. 08-2238-FCD (the
“Second California Action”), which was dismissed on
February 4, 2009;
O. On
September 26, 2008, Philips filed a Complaint against the LED
Group in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts,
captioned Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. v.
Lighting Science Group Corp. , et al., No. 08-11650 (D.
Mass.) (the “Second Massachusetts Action”);
P. On
October 7, 2008, the court in the California Action entered a
preliminary injunction against Philips (the “Preliminary
Injunction”);
Q. On
February 4, 2009, the Texas District Court dismissed the Texas
Action as to PENAC and PSSLS on February 4, 2009 and on
March 13, 2009, the action was non-suited against Philips
N.V.;
R. LSG, PENAC,
PSSLS, Philips N.V., Pegasus Capital and Pegasus Advisors entered
into a Confidentiality Agreement, effective as of March 23,
2009 (the “2009 Confidentiality Agreement”), which has
subsequently been amended (the “2009 Amended Confidentiality
Agreement”); and,
S. Without
addressing the merits of any party’s claims or defenses and
without any admission of liability of any sort on the part of any
party, Philips, LED Group and Pegasus (collectively, the
“parties”) have decided to resolve and settle fully,
finally and completely any and all claims or disputes relating to
any matter or occurrence regarding any of the events preceding this
Agreement, including disputes arising out of or related to the 2006
Confidentiality Agreement, the JDA, the Common Interest Agreement,
the Distributor Agreement, the IP Due Diligence Confidentiality
Agreement, the VAR Agreement, the LOI, Philips IP, LED Group IP,
the First Massachusetts Action, the California Action, the
Preliminary Injunction, the Texas Action, the New York Action, the
Second California Action and the Second Massachusetts
Action.
Page 2 of 10
NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the foregoing, and the mutual promises and
conditions contained herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1.
Effective Date . This Agreement shall be effective as of 27
August 2009 (the “Effective Date”).
a. On the
Effective Date, the parties shall deliver the following executed
agreements (collectively, the “Related
Agreements”):
i.
The Convertible Note, dated as of 27 August 2009 by and among
Lighting Science Group Corporation and Koninklijke Philips
Electronics N.V.
ii.
The Patent License Agreement, dated as of 27 August 2009 by
and between Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. and Lighting
Science Group Corporation;
iii.
The Commercial Framework Agreement, dated as of 27 August 2009
by and between Philips Lighting N.V. and Lighting Science Group
Corporation.
b. The execution
and delivery of the Related Agreements identified in sub-section a
above shall be deemed to be contemporaneous with the execution and
delivery of this Governing Agreement.
c. Although the
Related Agreements are referenced in this Governing Agreement,
their terms and provisions are not a part of this Governing
Agreement and those terms and provisions have not been incorporated
herein by reference.
a. IP Due
Diligence Confidentiality Agreement. Notwithstanding
anything in this Governing Agreement, the IP Due Diligence
Confidentiality Agreement shall continue in full force and effect
in accordance with its terms. To avoid any further assertion of
breach or other claims, within ten (10) business days after
the Effective Date, Pegasus and LSGC shall destroy or return to
PENAC all tangible copies of the Confidential Information (as
defined in the IP Due Diligence Confidentiality Agreement) provided
and certify, in writing, (i) that all such Confidential
Information has been destroyed or returned and, to the extent that
such Confidential Information resides in readily accessible
electronic form, that it has been deleted, or to the extent that
such Confidential Information resides in backup electronic form,
that it will be maintained as confidential in accordance with the
terms of the IP Due Diligence Confidentiality Agreement, and
(ii) that at the time the material was provided, a common
interest existed, as specified in the IP Due Diligence
Confidentiality Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
LSGC’s and Pegasus’ outside counsel each may retain a
copy of the Confidential Information subject to maintaining such
copies as confidential in accordance with the terms of the IP Due
Diligence Confidentiality Agreement.
b. Common
Interest Agreement . Notwithstanding anything in
this Governing Agreement, the Common Interest Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect in
Page 3 of 10
accordance with
its terms until 27 August 2011 and thereafter the materials
disclosed pursuant to the Common Interest Agreement shall be
considered non-confidential.
c. The 2006
Confidentiality Agreement . Notwithstanding anything in
this Governing Agreement, the 2006 Confidentiality Agreement shall
continue in full force and effect in accordance with its
terms.
d. Other
Agreements. The LOI, the Distributor Agreement, the VAR
Agreement, and the JDA shall be considered terminated and/or
expired according to their respective terms.
a. Effective on
the Effective Date, Philips, on behalf of themselves, their present
and former officers, directors, employees, parent and subsidiary
entities, affiliates, and assigns (the “Philips
Releasors”), do hereby forever release the LED Group, their
present and former officers and directors, employees, agents,
stockholders, affiliates, subsidiary or parent corporations,
members, representatives, insurers, attorneys, advisors,
successors, assigns, or anyone acting on their behalf (the
“LED Group Releasees”), from any liability, whether
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, concealed or hidden,
accrued or unaccrued, from the beginning of time through the
Effective Date, which against the LED Group Releasees (or any of
them), the Philips Releasors (or any of them) ever had, or now
have, including, but not limited to, claims in connection with,
arising out of or in any way related to (i) the 2006
Confidentiality Agreement, the JDA, the Common Interest Agreement,
the Distributor Agreement, the VAR Agreement, the IP Due Diligence
Confidentiality Agreement, and the LOI; (ii) use of Philips
IP; (iii) the allegations in the First Massachusetts Action,
the California Action, the Second Massachusetts Action and the
Second California Action; and (iv) the LED Group’s
litigation conduct.
b. Effective on
the Effective Date, the Philips Releasors do hereby forever release
Pegasus, their present and former officers and directors,
employees, agents, stockholders, affiliates, subsidiary or parent
corporations, members, representatives, insurers, attorneys,
advisors, successors, assigns, or anyone acting on their behalf
(the “Pegasus Releasees”), from any liability, whether
known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, concealed or hidden,
accrued or unaccrued, from the beginning of time through the
Effective Date, which against the Pegasus Releasees (or any of
them), the Philips Releasors (or any of them) ever had, or now
have, including, but not limited to, claims in connection with,
arising out of or in any way related to (i) the LOI, the IP
Due Diligence Confidentiality Agreement, and the Common Interest
Agreement, (ii) the allegations in the Texas Action and the
New York Action, and (iii) Pegasus’ litigation
conduct.
|