EX-10.73.04
THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE
AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
This THIRD AMENDMENT TO MASTER LEASE AND
SECURITY AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is dated as of
December 1, 2008 by and between HCP AUR1 CALIFORNIA A PACK, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“HCP California A
Pack”), HCP AUR1 CALIFORNIA B PACK, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“HCP California B Pack”), HCP AUR1
CONNECTICUT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HCP
Connecticut”), HCP AUR1 MARYLAND, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“HCP Maryland”), HCP AUR1
MASSACHUSETTS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“HCP Massachusetts”), HCP AUR1 NEW JERSEY, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“HCP New Jersey”),
HCP AUR1 VIRGINIA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“HCP Virginia,” and together with HCP California A
Pack, HCP California B Pack, HCP Connecticut, HCP Maryland, HCP
Massachusetts and HCP New Jersey, as their interests may appear,
“Lessor”), and EMERITUS CORPORATION, a Washington
corporation (“Lessee”).
RECITALS
A. Lessor
and Lessee entered into that certain Master Lease and Security
Agreement dated as of August 22, 2008 (the “Original
Lease”), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Master
Lease and Security Agreement dated as of October 20, 2008 (the
“First Amendment”) and that certain Second Amendment to
Master Lease and Security Agreement dated as of November 14, 2008
(the “Second Amendment,” and together with the Original
Lease and the First Amendment, collectively, the
“Lease”) for the lease of eleven (11) separate
assisted-living, Alzheimer’s care and/or nursing care
facilities located in the States of California, Connecticut,
Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Virginia, as more
particularly described in the Lease. Capitalized terms
not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to
them in the Lease. The First Amendment and the Second
Amendment may also sometimes be referred to herein collectively as
the “Amendments.”
B. Lessor
and Lessee desire to amend the Lease, but only upon the terms and
conditions set forth herein.
AMENDMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
covenants contained in this Amendment and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Lessor and Lessee hereby agree as
follows:
1.
Confirmatory Matters .
(a)
Commencement Date . Lessor and Lessee hereby acknowledge and
agree that (i) the Commencement Date for all purposes of the Lease
is December 1, 2008, (ii) the provisions of Article XLVII of the
Original Lease shall have no further force or effect, (iii) all of
the conditions to the continued effectiveness of the Lease provided
for in Article XLVIII of the Original Lease (as amended by the
Amendments) have been satisfied or waived and the provisions of
Article XLVIII of the Original Lease (as amended by the
Amendments), including, without limitation, any termination rights
contained therein, shall have no further force or effect, and (iv)
this Amendment is hereby executed by Lessor and Lessee in lieu of
the amendment provided for in Section 48.3 of the Original
Lease.
(b)
Expiration Date . The Expiration Date of the
Lease is November 30, 2018.
(c)
First Lease Year . The first Lease Year for the
Lease commences on December 1, 2008 and ends on November 30,
2009.
2.
Dedham, Massachusetts Facility Roof Repair .
(a) Promptly
following the Commencement Date, Lessor, at its sole cost and
expense, shall engage a roof consultant selected by Lessor and
reasonably approved by Lessee, (i) to perform a detailed evaluation
of the low-slope roof as recommended in the “Draft”
Property Condition Report for the Dedham, Massachusetts Facility
prepared by Terracon for Lessee dated November 3, 2008, and (ii) to
prepare a detailed report and recommendation regarding such
evaluation (the “Roof Inspection
Report”). Upon receipt of such Roof Inspection
Report, Lessor shall deliver a copy of the same to
Lessee.
(b) Any
repairs to or replacement of the roof of such Facility as
reasonably recommended in the Roof Inspection Report (the
“Roof Work”) shall be deemed for all purposes under the
Lease, as hereby amended, as part of the Planned Capital
Refurbishment Project for such Facility; provided, however, that
Lessor hereby agrees as follows in connection therewith:
(i) The Aggregate
Costs of the Planned Capital Refurbishment Project relating to such
Roof Work shall not be counted towards the Allocated Minimum
Aggregate Cost of the Planned Capital Refurbishment for such
Facility;
(ii) The Allocated
Planned Capital Refurbishment Project Allowance with respect to
such Facility shall be increased by the lesser of (A) the Aggregate
Costs of the Planned Capital Refurbishment Project relating to such
Roof Work and (B) $250,000 (the “Roof Work
Allowance”). Such increase in the Allocated
Planned Capital Refurbishment Project Allowance with respect to
such Facility for the Roof Work Allowance shall also cause a
corresponding increase in the total Planned Capital Refurbishment
Project Allowance for all Facilities; and
(iii) Lessor shall
disburse the Roof Work Allowance in accordance with and subject to
the provisions of Section 9.5.5 of the Original Lease, except that
Lessor’s obligation to fund the same shall not be limited to
Fifty Percent (50%) of the Aggregate Costs of the Planned Capital
Refurbishment Project relating to such Roof
Work, but shall instead be limited
to the lesser of (i) One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Aggregate
Costs of the Planned Capital Refurbishment Project for the Roof
Work expended by Lessee and (ii) the Roof Work
Allowance.
3.
San Diego, California Facility Conditional Use Permit
. Lessor and Lessee acknowledge that the San Diego,
California Facility is subject to the terms of that certain
Conditional Use Permit/Carmel Valley Planned District Permit No.
96-7232, granted by the Planning Commission of the City of San
Diego, as adopted on September 11, 1997 (the “San Diego
CUP”). The San Diego CUP purports to expire by its
own terms September 11, 2017, but pursuant to the terms thereof,
prior to the expiration date, the “Permittee”
thereunder may submit a new conditional use permit application to
the City Manager for consideration with review and a decision by
the appropriate decision maker at the time for a renewal or
extension of the San Diego CUP or for the issuance of a new
conditional use permit for such Facility. So long as no
Event of Default has occurred and is continuing under the Lease, as
hereby amended, and the Lease is in full force and effect with
respect to such Facility, Lessee may within a reasonable period of
time prior to the expiration date of the San Diego CUP submit a new
conditional use permit application to the City Manager for a
renewal or extension of the San Diego CUP or for the issuance of a
new conditional use permit for such Facility, in either case upon
substantially the same terms and conditions as the existing San
Diego CUP other than the expiration date which shall be extended or
removed, as applicable (herein, an “Extended San Diego
CUP”). Lessor agrees to cooperate with Lessee, at
no cost or expense to Lessor, in connection with Lessee’s
efforts to obtain such Extended San Diego CUP, including by
executing such reasonable documents as may be necessary and/or
requested by Lessee in connection therewith. Similarly,
if Lessor elects on its own to seek any such Extended San Diego
CUP, which Lessor shall have the right to do, Lessee agrees to
cooperate with Lessor in connection therewith, including by
executing such reasonable documents as may be necessary and/or
requested by Lessor in connection therewith.
4.
Carlsbad, California Facility Slope Remedial Work and CUP
.
(a)
Slope Remedial Work .
(i) Lessor
agrees to perform, or cause to be performed, at Lessor’s,
sole cost and expense, the planned remedial work to correct the
slope stability issues adjacent to the northeast portion of the
Leased Property of the Carlsbad, California Facility as identified
in the “Draft” Property Condition Report for such
Facility, prepared by Terracon for Lessee and dated November 3,
2008 (the “Slope Work”) and in accordance with the
design and construction drawings prepared by Applied Consultants
(the “Slope Plans”).
(ii) Lessor
shall be responsible to arrange, supervise, coordinate and carry
out all work necessary for the construction/performance and
completion of the Slope Work in accordance with the Slope Plans and
to obtain all building permits and other authorizations from any
applicable governmental authorities with jurisdiction required in
connection therewith (the “Slope Work
Permits”). To the extent the Slope Work
Permits have not been obtained as of the Commencement Date, Lessor
shall promptly apply for and thereafter use commercially reasonable
efforts to obtain all Slope
Work Permits as soon as
practicable. In the event that any applicable
governmental authorities with jurisdiction require any changes to
the Slope Plans as a condition to the issuance of the Slope Work
Permits, Lessor shall be solely responsible for the cost of any
modifications or changes thereto, and Lessee hereby consents to any
such required modifications or changes to the Slope Plans in
connection therewith.
(iii) Lessor
shall cause the Slope Work to be commenced promptly following the
later of the Commencement Date and the issuance of the Slope Work
Permits, and from and after commencement of thereof the Slope Work,
Lessor shall cause the Slope Work to be diligently prosecuted to
completion.
(iv) There
shall be no adjustment to the Allocated Minimum Rent for such
Facility on account of the Slope Work (it being understood and
agreed that the Slope Work described in this Section 4(a) shall not
be deemed to be a Capital Addition to such Facility paid for by
Lessor).
(b)
Conditional Use Permit .
(i) Lessor
and Lessee acknowledge that the Carlsbad, California Facility is
subject to the terms of that certain Conditional Use Permit No. CUP
96-19 issued by the City of Carlsbad on February 5, 1997 (the
“Carlsbad CUP”). The Carlsbad CUP purports
to have been granted for an initial term of 10 years (i.e., it
purports to have expired on February 4, 2007). The
Carlsbad CUP further provides that it may be extended for a
reasonable period of time not to exceed 10 years upon written
application of the “permitee” made no less than ninety
(90) days prior to the expiration date. Lessor is
currently investigating whether the Carlsbad CUP was in fact
extended, and Lessor has been informed by the Planning Commission
of the City that the City’s current policy is that any new
conditional use permit or any renewal or extension of an existing
conditional use permit will be issued in perpetuity and without an
expiration date, subject, however, to the terms and conditions of
such conditional use permit and the right of revocation if, after a
public hearing, it is found that the permitted use thereunder has a
substantial detrimental effect on surrounding land uses and the
public’s health and welfare, or the conditions imposed
thereby have not been met. In the event that Lessor
determines that the Carlsbad CUP was not extended in perpetuity in
accordance with the City’s current policy, then, promptly
following the Commencement Date and notwithstanding Lessor’s
belief, based on a review of California law that supports the
proposition that the Carlsbad CUP vested to the Leased Property of
such Facility the right to use and occupy such Facility for the
uses permitted by the Carlsbad CUP and that such right cannot be
revoked or non-renewed without a showing of cause, Lessor hereby
agrees, at its sole cost and expense, to apply for and thereafter
use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain an extension of the
existing Carlsbad CUP or a new conditional use permit for such
Facility, in either case upon substantially the same terms and
conditions as the existing Carlsbad CUP, other than the expiration
date which shall be extended or removed, as applicable (herein, an
“Extended Carlsbad CUP”). Lessor agrees to
keep Lessee reasonably informed regarding the status of such
application and shall promptly deliver to Lessee a copy of any such
Extended Carlsbad CUP if and when obtained. Lessee
agrees to cooperate with Lessor in connection with Lessor’s
efforts to
obtain an Extended Carlsbad CUP,
including by executing such reasonable documents as may be
necessary and/or requested by Lessor in connection
therewith.
(ii)
If and only if (A) Lessor is unable to obtain the Extended Carlsbad
CUP, and (B) the City requires that such Facility cease operations
for its Primary Intended Use based on either (x) a formal
revocation, following a public hearing, of the Carlsbad CUP or (y)
the failure or refusal to issue the Extended Carlsbad CUP, and not
as a result of any Lessee CUP Violation (as defined below), then
Lessee may cease operations of the Facility and vacate possession
thereof and the provisions of subclauses (1) and (2) below shall
apply; provided, however, that Lessor shall have the right (but not
the obligation), at its sole cost and expense (except as provided
below), to contest timely by appropriate legal proceedings any such
cessation requirement, and if Lessor so elects,
|