Back to top

MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 TO AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP

General Partnership Agreement

MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 TO AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP | Document Parties: DRS TECHNOLOGIES INC | Laurel Technologies, Inc You are currently viewing:
This General Partnership Agreement involves

DRS TECHNOLOGIES INC | Laurel Technologies, Inc

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 TO AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP
Date: 6/12/2006
Industry: Aerospace and Defense    

MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 TO AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT OF LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP, Parties: drs technologies inc , laurel technologies  inc
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.19

MODIFICATION NUMBER 1 TO AMENDMENT TO PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT OF LAUREL TECHNOLOGIES PARTNERSHIP

This Modification Number 1 to Amendment to Partnership Agreement of Laurel Technologies Partnership (“Modification Number 1”) is dated as of December 30 th,  2005 (the “Effective Date”), and is by and between Laurel Technologies, Inc., now known as Sunburst Management, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (“Laurel”), and DRS Systems Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“DRS”).

Laurel and DRS may also be referred to individually as a “Party” or collectively as the “Parties.”

WHEREAS, by way of a Partnership Agreement dated December 13, 1993, the Parties formed a Partnership for the Business and related activities necessary and appropriate to effect the Business; and

WHEREAS, by Amendment to Partnership Agreement of Laurel Technologies Partnership dated August 3, 1999 (the “Amendment”), the Parties agreed, inter alia, to undertake activities and programs the income from which would not be allocated in accordance with the Partnership Percentage Interest; and

WHEREAS, the Parties agree to further expand the concepts adopted in the Amendment through this Modification Number 1.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, and for good and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Laurel and DRS hereby agree as follows:

1.                 Section 1.2 is revised by adding 1.2(a)(1) as follows: “Assigned Indirect Costs” shall mean the portion of those costs classified as either Allocable Indirect Costs or Indirect Costs assigned to the DRS requested services pursuant to mutual agreement between the Partnership and specifically identified at Exhibit D as “DRS Requested Services.”

2.                 A new Section 2.3 is added as follows:

2.3         DRS Requested Services

2.3.1      Should DRS request the use of Partnership services (e.g., labor and / or facilities) for use on other DRS initiatives or projects not part of the Partnership Business base (“DRS Requested Services”) which are not considered Partnership Programs, DRS Allocated Programs or DRS Requested Programs but related to administrative / engineering activities that may develop manufacturing opportunities for the Partnership, DRS shall submit a written notice to Laurel of its desire to do so at least seven (7) days prior to causing the Partnership to commence work on such services. If, within seven (7) days after receipt of such notice, Laurel does not deliver a written objection thereto, which objection shall be limited to the designation of such service as a DRS Requested Service (an “Objection”), it shall be so designated. If, however, Laurel delivers a timely Objection to the designation of the service as a DRS Requested Service, DRS, at its sole option, may (1) designate the service as a New Partnership Program to be completed by the Partnership, (2) determine that the service will not be undertaken by the Partnership, or (3) refer the matter for dispute resolution as set forth in Section 4.3 of this Amendment; provided, however, that the Partnership shall not undertake the service pending resolution of the dispute.

2.3.2      All direct and indirect Costs incurred by the Partnership associated with DRS Requested Services shall be reimbursed by DRS.

2.3.3      It is anticipated that all DRS Requested Services will have the potential to have a follow-on manufacturing or hardware program. In the event the Partnership is involved in the marketing or development effort related to the DRS Requested

 



Services, any follow-on manufacturing / hardware program will be a Partnership Program. If the Partnership has no involvement in the marketing of the DRS Requested Services, then it will be considered a DRS Allocated Program (external customer) or a DRS Requested Program (internal customer). A specific example of the application of this situation would arise if DRS C3 wins an award of production through the efforts of its Center for Software Excellence from an external customer, the production would be awarded to the Partnership through an inte


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more