Exhibit 10.19
DELTA AIR LINES,
INC.
2009 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE
PLAN
1. Purpose.
The 2009 Management Incentive Plan
(the “ MIP ”) is an annual cash incentive
program sponsored by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“ Delta
” or the “ Company ”) that is intended to:
(a) closely link pay and performance by providing management
employees with a compensation opportunity based on Delta’s
achieving key business plan goals in 2009; and (b) align the
interests of management employees with the Company’s other
employees and stakeholders. The MIP is being adopted under, and is
subject to the terms of, the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2007 Performance
Compensation Plan (the “ 2007 Plan ”).
Capitalized terms that are used but not defined in the MIP shall
have the meaning ascribed to them in the 2007 Plan.
2. Plan
Administration. (a) The Personnel & Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors (the “ Committee
”) shall be responsible for the general administration and
interpretation of the MIP and for carrying out its provisions. The
Committee shall have such powers as may be necessary to discharge
its duties hereunder, including, without limitation, the following
powers and duties, but subject to the terms of the MIP:
(i) authority to construe and
interpret the terms of the MIP, and to determine eligibility,
awards and the amount, manner and time of payment of any awards
hereunder;
(ii) authority to prescribe forms
and procedures for purposes of MIP participation and distribution
of awards;
(iii) authority to adopt rules and
regulations and to take such actions as it deems necessary or
desirable for the proper administration of the MIP; and
(iv) authority at any time prior to
a Change in Control to eliminate or reduce the actual payout to any
Participant in the MIP. 1
(b) Any rule or decision by the
Committee that is not inconsistent with the provisions of the MIP
shall be conclusive and binding on all persons, and shall be given
the maximum deference permitted by law.
3. Eligibility.
All Delta employees worldwide who
are either officers, managing directors, directors, grade 11, grade
10 or grade 8 are eligible to participate in the MIP (“
Participants ”).
4. MIP Awards.
(a) General. The MIP award
(the “ MIP Award ”) each Participant receives,
if any, will be based on: (i) the Participant’s Target
MIP Award, as defined below; (ii) the level of achievement
within each applicable performance measure; and (iii) with
respect to the Financial Performance measure, as described below,
the occurrence of a payout for 2009 under the Company’s
broad-based employee profit sharing program (the “ Profit
Sharing Program ”). Certain additional requirements will
apply to any Participant who, as of December 31, 2009, is
employed by the Company as an executive vice president or more
senior officer or holds the position of general counsel or chief
financial officer of the Company (“ Executive Officer
Participant ”), as discussed in Section 7(b)
below.
|
1
|
For purposes of
the MIP, the merger of a subsidiary of Delta with and into
Northwest Airlines Corporation on October 29, 2008 shall not
be considered a Change in Control.
|
(b) Performance Measures .
The performance measures used will be one or more of financial
(“ Financial Performance ”), operational
(“ Operational Performance ”), merger
integration (“ Merger Integration Performance
”), leadership effectiveness (“ Leadership
Effectiveness Performance ”) and individual performance
(“ Individual Performance ”). Achievement under
each performance measure may range from below threshold, at which
there is no payout, to the maximum performance level, at which the
payout will be greater than the target level. See Section 6
below.
(c) Condition to Financial
Performance Payout . Any payout for Financial Performance is
contingent upon a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2009.
If there is no payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2009, no
amount will be paid with respect to Financial Performance
regardless of whether Delta meets or exceeds that performance
measure.
(d) Target MIP Award s. The
Target MIP Award for each Participant will be expressed as a
percentage of the Participant’s Annual Base Salary (the
“ Target MIP Award ”) as determined by the
Committee and will be communicated to Participants in such manner
as the Committee deems appropriate. Subject to Section 8
below, “ Annual Base Salary ” means the
Participant’s 2009 annual base salary as in effect on
December 31, 2009.
5. Weighting of Performance
Measures. Subject to
Section 8 below, a percentage of each Participant’s
Target MIP Award is allocated to one or more of Financial
Performance, Operational Performance, Merger Integration
Performance, Leadership Effectiveness Performance and/or Individual
Performance based on the Participant’s employment level, as
follows:
2
Performance Measures and Weighting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employment
Level
|
|
% of Target
MIP Award
allocated to
Financial
Performance
(B)
|
|
|
% of Target
MIP Award
allocated to
Operational
Performance
(C)
|
|
|
% of Target
MIP Award
Allocated to
Merger
Integration
Performance
(D)
|
|
|
% of Target
MIP Award
allocated to
Leadership
Effectiveness
Performance
(E)
|
|
|
% of Target
MIP Award
allocated to
Individual
Performance
(F)
|
|
|
CEO
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
President
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
EVP
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
34
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
SVP
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
VP
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
Managing Director
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
Director
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grade 11
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
Grade 10
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
Grade 8
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
6. The Performance
Measures—Threshold, Target and Maximum Payout
Levels. The Target MIP
Award, and the amounts paid in connection with target levels of
Financial, Operational, Merger Integration, Leadership
Effectiveness, and Individual Performance, are based on the
achievement of the target performance level with respect to each
applicable performance measure (except that Financial Performance
also requires a payout under the Profit Sharing Program for 2009).
A Participant’s actual MIP Award may be greater or less than
the target amount based on whether performance under one or more of
the performance measures applicable to the Participant exceeds or
is below target performance. This is explained in more detail
below.
(a) Financial Performance
Measures . The Financial Performance measures for 2009 are
based on Delta’s Pre-Tax Income, as defined below. The
following table describes the performance ranges and award payout
levels for 2009 Financial Performance, subject to Section 4(c)
above:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
% of Target Financial Performance Measure
Paid
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
200
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required 2009 Pre-Tax Income
|
|
$
|
856 million
|
|
|
$
|
1.278 billion
|
|
|
$
|
1.700 billion
|
|
Payouts will be straight-line
interpolated when Pre-Tax Income results fall above Threshold and
below Target or above Target and below Maximum.
3
“Pre-Tax
Income” will be the
amount of Pre-Tax Income, if any, determined under the Profit
Sharing Program for 2009. 2
(b) Operational Performance
Measures . The Operational Performance measures for 2009 are
based on both Delta and Delta Connection operational performance,
with (i) Delta’s operational performance accounting for
75% of the measure and (ii) Delta Connection performance
accounting for 25% of the measure. Delta’s Operational
Performance is based on the number of times during 2009 that Delta
meets or exceeds its monthly goals under the broad-based employee
shared rewards program (the “ Shared Rewards Program
”). Delta Connection’s Operational Performance is based
on the number of times during 2009 that the Delta Connection
carriers meet or exceed their monthly operational goals for
(x) completion factor and (y) on-time performance (the
“ Delta Connection Goals ”). The Delta
Connection Goals and the methodology for determining whether these
goals are met are described in Exhibit A hereto. The
following table describes the performance ranges and award payout
levels for 2009 Operational Performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below Threshold
|
|
|
Threshold
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
Shared Rewards Program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Target Payout for this Performance Measure
(75% Weighting)
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
37.50
|
%
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of monthly Shared Rewards Program goals
actually met during 2009
|
|
15 or less
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
26 or more
|
|
|
Delta Connection Goals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Target Payout for this Performance Measure
(25% Weighting)
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
12.50
|
%
|
|
25
|
%
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
Number of Delta Connection Goals actually met
during 2009
|
|
8 or less
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
19 or more
|
|
Payouts based on the Shared Rewards
Program and Delta Connection Goals will be straight-line
interpolated when actual performance results fall above Threshold
and below Target or above Target and below Maximum.
|
2
|
The Profit
Sharing Program for 2009 defines “Pre-Tax Income” as
follows: for any calendar year, the Company’s consolidated
pre-tax income calculated in accordance with Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles in the United States and as reported in the
Company’s public securities filings but excluding:
(a) all asset write downs related to long term assets,
(b) gains or losses with respect to employee equity
securities, (c) gains or losses with respect to extraordinary,
one-time or non-recurring events (including without limitation
one-time transition or integration costs incurred in connection
with the merger of the Company and Northwest Airlines Corporation
during the two year period following the merger), and
(d) expense accrued with respect to the profit sharing
plan.
|
4
(c) Merger Integration Performance
Measures . The Merger Integration Performance measures for 2009
will be measured based on the achievement of quantifiable synergies
as a result of the merger of a wholly owned subsidiary of Delta
with and into Northwest Airlines Corporation on October 29,
2008 (the “ Merger ”), including, without
limitation, expense reductions (including a decrease in cost per
available seat mile); an increase in revenue or revenue growth
(including an increase in revenue per available seat mile or
increased revenue from a new or amended affinity card agreement);
and productivity and process improvement. Company management will
periodically report to the Company’s Board of Directors
regarding Merger synergies. The following table describes the
performance ranges and award payout levels for 2009 Merger
Integration Performance: