Back to top

LETTER AGREEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2004

Exclusivity No Shop Agreement

LETTER AGREEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2004 | Document Parties: DLJ Merchant Banking Partners III, L.P |  Trump Plaza Associates | Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc You are currently viewing:
This Exclusivity No Shop Agreement involves

DLJ Merchant Banking Partners III, L.P | Trump Plaza Associates | Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: LETTER AGREEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2004
Date: 3/30/2004

LETTER AGREEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 12, 2004, Parties: dlj merchant banking partners iii  l.p ,  trump plaza associates , trump hotels & casino resorts  inc
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.20

 

LETTER AGREEMENT

 

This LETTER AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of February 12, 2004, between Trump Atlantic City Associates, a New Jersey general partnership (“TAC”) and DLJ Merchant Banking Partners III, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“DLJMB”).

 

WHEREAS, on January 21, 2004, Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and DLJMB entered into an Exclusivity Agreement (the “Exclusivity Agreement”) setting forth certain matters related to a possible transaction pursuant to which DLJMB would make a substantial equity investment in the Company in connection with a restructuring of the debt securities of the Company’s subsidiaries and its controlled affiliates (the “Transaction”), which agreement remains in full force and effect;

 

WHEREAS, the Company has advised DLJMB that it has determined that it will publicly disclose the fact that it has entered into the Exclusivity Agreement with DLJMB and is in active negotiations with respect to the Transaction, as described in the term sheet being discussed by the Company and DLJMB;

 

WHEREAS, the Exclusivity Agreement provides that DLJMB may terminate such discussions with the Company with respect to the Transaction if such a disclosure is made without its consent;

 

WHEREAS, DLJMB is concerned about the risks attendant to negotiating the Transaction in a public forum, the reputational issues associated with the possible failure to consummate the Transaction, and the uncertainties associated with accomplishing the restructuring of the Company’s subsidiaries’ and its controlled affiliates’ debt as well as the significant time, effort and expense which needs to be devoted to the project;

 

WHEREAS, DLJMB nonetheless remains interested in the Transaction;

 

WHEREAS, TAC has a substantial interest in the Transaction being consummated and has determined that entering into this Agreement is necessary in order to assure DLJMB’s continued pursuit of the Transaction;

 

WHEREAS, in light of the potential “stalking horse” role which may be played by DLJMB and TAC’s desire to consummate the Transaction, TAC has determined to provide some certainty to DLJMB in connection with the significant time, effort and expense which DLJMB will continue to expend in order to consummate the Transaction; and

 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of TAC has determined that it is in the best interests of TAC and its various constituencies for TAC to enter into this Agreement.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1. Expenses . TAC shall reimburse DLJMB for all Transaction Expenses (as defined in the Exclusivity Agreement) incurred by DLJMB beginning after the date of this Agreement and accruing until, and shall be payable upon, the earlier to occur of (i) the consummation of an Alternative Transaction (as defined below) and (ii) the date that is eighteen months following the date of this Agreement; provided, however, Transaction Expenses through such date shall be payable immediately upon the sale (whether through a stock sale or sale of assets) of either the Trump Marina Hotel Casino or the Trump Indiana Casino Hotel; provided, further, that (a) such reimbursement obligation shall not duplicate any amounts reimbursed under the Exclusivity Agreement and (b) the aggregate amount of Transaction Expenses reimbursed to DLJMB shall not exceed $5 million. At such time as TAC is required to reimburse DLJMB for the Transaction Expenses pursuant to the preceding sentence, such reimbursement shall be made promptly based upon the submission by DLJMB to the Company of an invoice for such Transaction Expenses, which invoice shall contain a reasonably detailed breakdown and supporting documentation reflecting any amounts due under such invoice.

 

2. Transaction Fee . TAC will become obligated to pay $25 million (the “Transaction Fee”) to DLJMB if, on or prior to December 1, 2004, an Alternative Transaction occurs. The Transaction Fee (if any) shall be earne


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more