Exhibit 4.46
AGREEMENT
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A
PROOF-OF-PRINCIPLE
AUTOMATED TABLET ENCAPSULATING
MACHINE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Made on
|
|
2
nd March 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project number
|
|
TABWRAP -
Capri
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue
A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author:
|
|
Stephen
Lee
|
|
Date:
|
|
1
st March 2005
|
BioProgress Technology Ltd
Hostmoor Avenue
March
Cambridgeshire
PE15 0AX
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
GB Innomech has a unique blend of expertise that
closely compliments the requirements of this project. These include
conceptual design, development of new production processes,
integration of new and existing plant, and innovation of unique
solutions, which are reliable, safe and easy to use and maintain.
We can provide a turnkey solution from design, (hardware and
software), through integration and assembly to installation,
commissioning and on into full production, including complete
documentation, all handled by our in-house engineering
team.
We have extensive experience in providing
equipment for many industries and have chosen to apply the
procedures and practices used when supplying the pharmaceutical
industry to all projects. This has resulted in the development of
procedures and project management systems which ensure the
equipment will work reliably and to specification for applications
such as that of your Tablet Encapsulation requirement. Indeed, it
is worth noting that we are registered BS ISO 9001:2000 and TickIT
for our management systems. We are confident that our offering will
provide BioProgess with the best results and optimum benefits
associated with a thoroughly considered and comprehensive
solution.
Because of the significant level of development
involved in this project the parties have agreed to break the total
job down into smaller parts to make it easier to manage and
control. This Agreement therefore comprises a staged estimate
covering the various activities associated with the complete
design, manufacture, supply and commissioning of a
Proof-of-Principle automated Tablet Encapsulation Machine in
accordance with the initial User Requirement Specification (URS)
produced by BioProgress.
As progress is made through each of the project
stages, the work content of the subsequent stages becomes clear and
enables the parties to accurately determine and agree the costs
prior to each stage commencing. The estimate therefore includes a
fixed price for stages 1 - 4 and shows our best estimates for the
subsequent stages, based on detailed analysis of the initial
version of the URS. Although, only estimates, they are expected to
be reasonably accurate and they will be reviewed and binding
quotations agreed prior to commencement of each stage as they
arise.
The project is also divided into two phases each
representing a variant of the machine as it moves through the
development process, with each phase comprising a group of stages,
as follows;
|
|
Phase
|
1: A three lane
version of the machine comprising stages 1 to 11 of the
quotation.
|
|
|
Phase
|
2: The full
twenty-one lane machine comprising stages 11 to 16 of the
quotation.
|
The details of the content and the deliverables
of each of the stages are shown in section 6.
2
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue
|
|
Change Description
|
|
Author
|
|
Date
|
|
A
|
|
Initial Issue
|
|
Stephen Lee
|
|
02/03/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
INTRODUCTION
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
P ROJECT S COPE
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
ISSUE
HISTORY
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTENTS
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
R EFERENCES
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
D EFINITIONS
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
MACHINE
OVERVIEW
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
PROJECT
BREAKDOWN
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
S TAGE 1:
P ROJECT D EFINITION -
P HASE 1
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
S TAGE 2:
E XPERIMENTATION
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
S TAGE 3:
M ECHANICAL
F UNCTIONAL D ESIGN ( TO
RUN IN PARALLEL WITH STAGE 2)
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
S TAGE 4:
C ONTROL S YSTEM F UNCTIONAL D ESIGN ( TO
RUN IN PARALLEL WITH STAGE 3)
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
S TAGE 5:
M ECHANICAL
D ETAIL D ESIGN AND RELEASE TO MANUFACTURE
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
S TAGE 6:
D ETAILED C ONTROL AND E LECTRICAL D ESIGN PLUS CODING
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
S TAGE 7:
P ROCUREMENT
( TO OVERLAP WITH STAGE 5)
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
|
S TAGE 8:
A SSEMBLY
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
S TAGE 9:
I NTEGRATION
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.10
|
|
S TAGE 10:
D EVELOPMENT
( SOME OVERLAP WITH STAGE 9)
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.11
|
|
S TAGE 11:
R ELEASE TO P
HASE 2
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.12
|
|
S TAGE 12:
P ROCUREMENT
- P HASE 2
( TO OVERLAP WITH STAGE 10)
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.13
|
|
S TAGE 13:
A SSEMBLY
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
6.14
|
|
S TAGE 14:
I NTEGRATION
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
|
S TAGE 15:
D EVELOPMENT
( SOME OVERLAP WITH STAGE 9)
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
6.16
|
|
S TAGE 16:
D ELIVER AND SAT
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE
SPECIFICATION
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
PROJECT
MANAGEMENT
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
PRICES AND
TIMESCALES
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
P RICES
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
V ALIDITY
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
|
P AYMENT STAGES
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
D ELIVERY
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
E XPENSES
|
|
12
|
3
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
C ANCELLATION
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
E QUIPMENT TO BE
SUPPLIED
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
I TEMS NOT INCLUDED
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
S COPE AND C HANGE C ONTROL
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
9.10
|
|
D OCUMENTATION
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
MAINTENANCE
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
WARRANTY
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
RISK AND TITLE
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
FORCE MAJEURE
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
CONFIDENTIALITY
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
GENERAL
|
|
18
|
4
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
This Agreement is made on 2nd March 2005 and
sets out the initial terms which have been agreed between GB
Innomech (“GBI” or “we”) and BioProgess
Technology Ltd (“BPT” or “you”) (whose
respective addresses are set out on the front sheet.) It outlines a
design proposal for an automated Tablet Encapsulation Machine and
provides prices and time scales for the development of the system.
Upon signature by the parties, this document will form the basis of
the contractual agreement between GBI and BPT and the terms set out
herein shall be binding on each party unless and until superseded
by a fuller legal agreement.
The proposed design is intended to meet the
requirements and performance specifications as described in the
User Requirements Specification.
To ensure safe operation, the system will be
designed and inspected in accordance with all relevant European
Union health and safety regulations. This will enable the complete
system to be taken through EMC and safety certification. The
machine will be built to comply with GAMP 4 guidelines and when
completed will be ready for the validation process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ref.
|
|
Full Document Title
|
|
Reference
|
|
Produced By
|
|
1
|
|
User
Requirement Specification (URS)
|
|
TBA
|
|
BPT/GBI
|
|
2
|
|
Factory
Acceptance Test (FAT)
|
|
TBA
|
|
BPT/GBI
|
|
3
|
|
Functional
Design Specification (FDS)
|
|
QAEVD02
|
|
GBI
|
Each of the above is subject to final; approval
and sign off by BPT
In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise
requires
“FMECA” means Failure Mode and
Effect and Criticality Analysis
“____” means general arrangement of
the equipment
“GAMP 4” means Good Automated
Manufacturing Processes referenced to International Society of
Pharmaceutical Engineers
“HDS” means hardware design
specification “IQ” means Installation
Qualification
“OQ” means Operational
Qualification
“PQ” means Process
Qualification
“SAT” means Site Acceptance
Test
“SDS” means software design
specification
“URS” means, until the agreement of
the final User Requirement Specification, the initial User
Requirement Specification, developed by BPT prior to the date
hereof.
“CAD” means computer aided design,
including graphical representations and finite element
analyses.
5
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
The machine will be a Proof-of-Principle
development system of a method of encapsulating tablets with an
HPMC film. It will comprise two rotating drums with pockets for
retaining the tablets. A small dose of glue will be applied to the
tablet using inkjet printing technology and the film will be
applied, heated, vacuum formed around the tablet and cut by lasers.
This process is then repeated for the opposite side of the tablet
and the seam where the two coatings overlap will then be
‘ironed’ to improve bonding and appearance.
The initial version of the machine will have 3
lanes of pockets and when the size, shape and other design criteria
are successfully achieved then a final 21-lane version will be
completed.
The parties have agreed to divide the project
down into smaller parts to make it easier to manage and control.
Below are the breaks and the work content of each stage as
currently agreed. As much of GBI’s focus will be on
maintaining good progress, it is agreed that on some occasions
these stages will overlap, with the prior agreement of BPT. The
Parties have also grouped some of the stages to assist with
identifying significant milestones and payment points. These are
shown in section 9.
|
6.1
|
Stage 1:
Project Definition - Phase 1
|
a) Review of concepts
b) Project planning
c) Review risks
d) Determine main areas of
investigation needed to minimise risk
e) Discussions with key suppliers on
feasibility of process and selection of probable
partners
f) Agree URS
Deliverables;
Revised URS
Project Timing Plan
Quotation and agreement (this
document) approved and signed. (Note: price for stages 1
through
4 agreed and authorised at
£170,000).
First release of FMECA
6.2 Stage 2: Experimentation
a) Define experiments needed to
prove concepts
b) Build and/or organize suitable
methods and means to test and prove the suitability and capability
of the concepts.
c) Work in conjunction with
suppliers
d) Review results and practical
implementation
Deliverables;
Written test reports
Confirmation by physical
demonstration or through analytical means (i.e calculation, CAD
models), of key processes
Written report identifying critical
process and machined design parameters from experiments.
6.3 Stage 3: Mechanical Functional Design
(to run in parallel with stage 2)
a) Layout machine
b) Fully investigate in 3D design of
risk areas in parallel with experiments
6
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
c) Produce 3D design of machine and
main structure
d) Complete FDS
e) FMECA review
f) Revise GA if required
Deliverables;
Machine G A – 1st
release
Functional Design
Specification
Mechanical FMECA – 2
nd
review
Process FMECA – 2
nd
review
Firm quotation for stages 5-7 and
8-10
6.4 Stage 4: Control System Functional
Design (to run in parallel with stage 3)
a) Layout control system and block
diagram
b) Define hardware and
software
c) Define interfaces
d) Complete control system
HDS
e) Create first draft of
SDS
f) FMECA review
g) Revise specifications if
required
Deliverables;
Hardware Design
Specification
Software Design
Specification
Software FMECA – 2
nd
review
6.5 Stage 5: Mechanical Detail Design and
release to manufacture
a) Complete G A for all
parts
b) Detail parts and issue for
manufacture
Deliverables;
G A – final release
Detailed drawings made available for
review if requested by BPT
Parts List
6.6 Stage 6: Detailed Control and Electrical
Design plus coding
a) First issue of SDS
b) Create control software for
modules required for first trials
c) Create software for User
Interface
d) Circuit diagrams
Deliverables;
Software Design
Specification
User interface review
Circuit Diagrams – 1
st
issue
Draft FAT and SAT qualification
document for phases 1 and 2.
6.7 Stage 7: Procurement (to overlap with
stage 5)
a) Create full parts list (including
all specified sourced items)
b) Order all parts for scheduled
build (and test requirements)
7
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
Deliverables;
Confirmation of order and delivery
of parts and effect (if any) on Project Timing Plan
6.8 Stage 8: Assembly
a) Assemble hardware and electrical
equipment
Deliverables;
Assembly inspection
6.9 Stage 9: Integration
a) Integrate hardware software and
bought out equipment
b) Modify code and hardware as
required during development
Deliverables;
Agreed FAT and SAT qualification
document for phases 1 and 2
Machine ready for in-house
testing
6.10 Stage 10: Development (some overlap
with stage 9)
a) Run machine
b) Evaluate
c) Re-design as required to achieve
reliable phase 1 machine
d) FMECA review
Deliverables;
Successful completion of Phase 1
FAT
Firm quotation for stages 11 &
12 and 13 - 15
6.11 Stage 11: Release to Phase
2
Deliverables;
Revised G A
6.12 Stage 12: Procurement - Phase 2 (to
overlap with stage 10)
a) Create full parts list (including
all specified sourced items)
b) Order all parts for scheduled
build (and test requirements)
Deliverables;
Confirmation of order and delivery
of parts and effect (if any) on Project Timing Plan
6.13 Stage 13: Assembly
a) Assemble hardware and electrical
equipment
Deliverables;
Assembly inspection
8
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
6.14 Stage 14: Integration
a) Integrate hardware software and
bought out equipment
b) Modify code and hardware as
required during development
Deliverables;
Machine ready for in-house
testing
6.15 Stage 15: Development (some overlap
with stage 9)
a) Run machine
b) Evaluate
c) Re-design as required to achieve
reliable phase 2 machine
d) FMECA review
Deliverables;
Successful completion of Phase 2
FAT
Comment: Firm quotation for stage
16
6.16 Stage 16: Deliver and SAT
a) Ship and install
b) Complete installation
SAT
c) Documentation
completed
Deliverables;
Delivery of Machine
IQ
OQ
Machine ready for process
development and validation
Work by GBI on each stage (or where previously
agreed by BPT group of stages) shall only be commenced when
expressly authorized in writing by BPT following agreement of the
detailed specifications for the deliverables, timescale, milestones
fixed price and payment stages for the relevant stage as
appropriate;
|
7
|
PERFORMANCE
SPECIFICATION
|
The machine will perform and handle product as
per the initial URS. Changes may be required once the final version
of the URS has been established at the completion of stage 1. The
parties will, so soon as practicable agree full OQ and PQ
documentation, in accordance, in the case of PQ, with a detailed
brief produced by BPT, which shall form part of the eventual FAT
and, together with IQ, the SAT test protocol. GBI will make such
modifications to the machine during the course of design and/or
assembly as may be necessary to ensure that the machine complies
with the URS, the PQ and OQ
Upon completion of the manufacture of the
machine, GBI shall carry out a FAT on the principles to be agreed
in detail prior to the commencement of Stage 7. The purpose of this
trial shall be primarily to determine that the machine is compliant
with the URS, PQ and OQ Upon satisfactory completion of the FAT,
GBI shall deliver a written certification that the machine has
passed the FAT and fully meets the URS and the detailed standards
agreed. BPT shall work with GBI and observe such FAT. It is
understood that all defects in materials, workmanship and design
for relevant compliance requirements which may be identified as a
result of the FAT will be corrected GBI prior to the issue of the
certificate of compliance unless specifically directed to the
contrary by BPT.
9
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
Upon completion of the installation of the
machine, GBI shall carry out a SAT on the principles agreed in
detail prior to the commencement of Stage 7 in the presence of and
with the co-operation of BPT. Upon satisfactory completion of the
SAT, GBI shall deliver a written certification that the machine has
passed the SAT and fully meets the URS and the detailed standards
agreed.
In the event that BPT reasonably believes that
the SAT identifies areas of non-conformity with the URS and/or the
detailed SAT principles agreed, BPT shall itemize those areas in
which the machine has failed to perform acceptably. GBI shall
acknowledge such list and, save in the case of bona fide dispute,
in which case the provisions set out below shall apply, shall
inform BPT in writing as to how and when the non-conformity will be
corrected. GBI agrees that such corrections shall be carried out
with all reasonable dispatch and at no additional cost to BPT. BPT
shall have the right to withhold payment of any outstanding funds
due in relation to the project until such time as the machine has
fully complied with the URS. Upon completion of the corrections by
GBI, GBI shall notify BPT of the same and the SAT shall again be
conducted in its entirety should BPT elect to do so. Where BPT does
not elect to repeat the SAT or to refer any dispute as to
compliance pursuant to dispute resolution within 14 days of such
notification, the machine shall be deemed accepted and any sums
withheld in respect thereof shall be due and payable.
In the event that the parties are unable to
agree whether or not the machine has performed acceptably in
accordance with the URS and /or the detailed SAT principles agreed,
or whether any machine has any prefect in workmanship or materials,
the matter may be referred at the insistance of either party to
such person as may be appointed by agreement between them, or in
default of agreement, nominated on the application of either party
to the President for the time being of the Institution of
Mechanical Engineers in London (the “Expert”). Such
person shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator and shall be
entitled to appoint such technical expert or experts as he
considers necessary to assist him in determining the matter
referred to him. The decision of the Expert (which shall be given
by him in writing stating his reasons) shall, in the absence of
manifest error, be final and binding on the parties hereto. Each
party shall provide the Expert with such information as he may
reasonably require for the purposes of his determination. If any
party claims any such information to be confidential to it, then,
provided that in the opinion of the Expert that party has properly
claimed the same as confidential, the Expert shall not disclose the
same to the other party or to any third party. The costs of the
Expert (including the cost of any technical experts appointed by
him) shall be borne in such proportions as the Expert may determine
to be fair and reasonable in all the circumstances or, if no such
determination is made by the Expert by the parties hereto, in equal
proportions.
_______ will assign a project manager to the
project. The project manager will develop the Quality Plan and
Project Plan for this project for approval by BPT and oversee their
implementation. The project manager will keep BPT informed of the
progress of the project via regular project meetings and updated
project plans at least once per month. BPT will be invited to
participate in risk and design reviews at key stages of the
project.
GBI shall provide to BPT, upon request, full
cost breakdowns of the initial estimates and subsequent firm
quotations produced by GBI for any stage requested and shall
provide such further detail and explanation as BPT may
request.
10
COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL
To provide the equipment as outlined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stages 1
|
|
£
|
25,000
|
|
Stages 2, 3 & 4
|
|
£
|
145,000
|
|
Stages 5, 6 & 7
|
|
£
|
590,000
|
|
Stages 8, 9 & 10
|
|
£
|
175,000
|
|
Stages 11 & 12
|
|
£
|
365,000
|
|
Stages 13, 14 & 15
|
|
£
|
135,000
|
|
Stages 16
|
|
£
|
35,000
|
|
Project Total
|
|
£
|
1,470,000
|
The prices shown are exclusive of VAT, packing
and shipping charges.
Stages 1 to 4; prices are fixed and
agreed.
Validity of the subsequent stages will be
agree