Back to top

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

Collaboration Agreement

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION COLLABORATION AGREEMENT | Document Parties: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd You are currently viewing:
This Collaboration Agreement involves

Bristol-Myers Squibb Company | Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co, Ltd

. RealDealDocs™ contains millions of easily searchable legal documents and clauses from top law firms. Search for free - click here.
Title: AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION COLLABORATION AGREEMENT
Date: 8/17/2009
Industry: Major Drugs     Sector: Healthcare

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION COLLABORATION AGREEMENT, Parties: bristol-myers squibb company , otsuka pharmaceutical co  ltd
50 of the Top 250 law firms use our Products every day

Exhibit 10.13

* CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN FILED

SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

AMENDMENT NO. 3

TO THE

RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AND COMMERCIALIZATION

COLLABORATION AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 (“Amendment”) to that certain Restated Development and Commercialization Collaboration Agreement dated October 23, 2001 (“Restated Agreement”), is made and entered into as of September 25, 2006 (“3 rd Amendment Effective Date”), by and between Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (“Otsuka”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan, having a principal place of business at 2-9, Kanda Tsukasa-cho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 101-8535 Japan, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (“BMS”), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, having a principal place of business at 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154, USA.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Otsuka and BMS have previously entered into the Restated Agreement and an Amendment No. 1 (dated March 28, 2003) and an Amendment No. 2 (dated June 5, 2003) to the Restated Agreement;

WHEREAS, Otsuka and BMS now desire to amend certain terms and conditions of the Restated Agreement as hereinafter specified;

WHEREAS, Otsuka and BMS desire that all other terms and conditions of the Restated Agreement, as previously amended, remain in full force and effect;

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Otsuka and BMS agree as follows:

1. Capitalized terms in this Amendment shall have the same meanings as those in the Restated Agreement, unless specifically defined otherwise in this Amendment. All Section references are in regard to the Restated Agreement. References to the term “Agreement” in the Restated Agreement shall be deemed to include this Amendment.

2. Except as expressly modified herein, the Restated Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms, as previously amended. To the extent that there are any inconsistencies between this Amendment and the Restated Agreement, as previously amended, the terms of this Amendment shall supersede the Restated Agreement.

3. In consideration for any exercise by Otsuka of its rights under Subsection 8.2.2(a) of the Restated Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, BMS hereby agrees to, and shall, pay Otsuka the sum of [*] within ten (10) days after the 3 rd Amendment Effective Date.


4. Otsuka and BMS hereby amend and restate Section 8.2 of the Restated Agreement in its entirety as follows:

8.2 Patent Infringement by Third Party .

8.2.1 Notice of Infringement .

If, during the term of this Agreement, either party becomes aware of any infringement, threatened infringement or suspected infringement by any third party of any Patent Rights in the Field in the Territory, such party shall promptly give written notice thereof to the other party, with all available details in its possession. The party involved in any such action or controlling any action under Section 8.2.2 or 8.2.3 (the “Active Party”) shall, in each case except as provided to the contrary in Sections 8.2.2 and 8.2.3: (a) keep the other party (the “Inactive Party”) reasonably informed of the status of the action including, but not limited to, significant developments during the pendency of such action; (b) endeavor to solicit the participation and views of the Inactive Party during each stage of the action; and (c) reasonably consider such Inactive Party’s views, although the Active Party’s judgment shall control.

8.2.2. Remedies Against Infringement of Patent Rights in the United States .

(a) Otsuka’s First Right to Pursue Remedies Against Infringement of Patent Rights in the United States .

(i) With respect to any infringement, threatened infringement or suspected infringement of any Patent Rights in the Field in the United States, Otsuka shall have the first right, but not the obligation, to take action, at its expense, to pursue any and all remedies against such infringer to stop such infringement and to recover profits and damages in connection therewith.

(ii) Pursuant to such right of Otsuka, in all actions, disputes and proceedings involving Patent Rights in the United States, Otsuka shall have the sole and exclusive right to control prosecution of such actions, disputes and proceedings (including the right to select counsel in connection therewith) and shall (notwithstanding Section 8.2.1) have no obligation to keep BMS informed regarding any such actions, disputes or proceedings or the prosecution thereof. BMS shall have no right to control, or to participate in, the decision making process with respect to any such actions, disputes or proceedings involving the enforcement of the Patent Rights in the United States, any infringement, threatened infringement, or suspected infringement of the Patent Rights in the United States, or the settlement or compromise thereof. BMS’s consent to the settlement or compromise of any such action, dispute or proceeding pertaining to the Patent Rights shall not be required; provided, however, that Otsuka will not enter into any settlement or compromise of any such action, dispute or proceeding that requires BMS to pay money to a third party or that imposes liability on BMS without BMS’s prior written consent, which BMS shall not unreasonably withhold (such settlement or compromise being referred to in this Section 8.2.2 and in Section 8.2.3 as a “Settlement Requiring

 

2

* CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


BMS Consent”). Otsuka shall not be required to inform BMS, or to consult with BMS, in respect of any action, dispute or proceeding, or the settlement or compromise of any action or dispute, pertaining to the infringement, threatened infringement or suspected infringement of the Patent Rights or the enforcement of the Patent Rights in the United States, except only as and to the extent required above with respect to a Settlement Requiring BMS Consent. Further, BMS may not join as a party in any such actions, disputes or proceedings.

(iii) BMS shall cooperate with Otsuka as reasonably requested by Otsuka in connection with such action, dispute or proceeding, shall cause any of BMS’s and its Affiliates’ employees and agents to give depositions or testify in connection with any proceeding regarding the Patent Rights in the United States when requested by Otsuka, and shall make available to Otsuka copies of any and all relevant records, papers, documents, information and specimens. BMS shall bear the out-of-pocket expenses and internal costs incurred by it and its Affiliates in providing such cooperation to Otsuka at Otsuka’s request, in causing such employees and agents to give such depositions or testimony, and in making available copies of such documents or other materials.

(iv) In the event of any monetary recovery by Otsuka in connection with any such action, dispute or proceeding in the United States involving the Patent Rights in the Field, or the settlement or compromise thereof, such recovery shall be entirely retained by Otsuka for its own account and benefit.

(v) In the event that any adverse judgment for monetary liability is imposed on either Otsuka or any of its Affiliates in favor of a third-party litigant in any such action, dispute or proceeding in the United States involving the Patent Rights in the Field, Otsuka shall bear the entirety of such adverse judgment.

(b) BMS’s Back-Up Right to Pursue Remedies Against Infringement of the Patent Rights in the United States .

(i) With respect to any infringement, threatened infringement or suspected infringement of any Patent Rights in the Field in the United States, if (1) Otsuka decides in writing to BMS not to pursue remedies against the alleged or suspected infringer(s), and (2) in any event if Otsuka fails to commence appropriate action with respect to such infringement within one hundred twenty (120) days after BMS’s written request to Otsuka to do so, BMS shall have the right, but not the obligation, to take action in its name, or in Otsuka’s name where legally required, and at BMS’s expense, to pursue any and all remedies against such infringer to stop such infringement and to recover profits and damages. In any such case, Otsuka shall be entitled, at its own expense, to join as a party in pursuing such remedies, if legally permissible. Should Otsuka’s direct participation in the legal proceedings be indispensable (i.e., it is not legally permissible for BMS to pursue remedies in Otsuka’s name), BMS shall be entitled to request Otsuka, at BMS’s expense, to pursue remedies (which request Otsuka shall not unreasonably refuse). BMS shall promptly reimburse Otsuka for Otsuka’s out-of-pocket expenses (but not Otsuka’s internal costs) reasonably incurred in so participating.

 

3

* CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED. CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


For purposes of determining BMS’s right to pursue remedies under this Subsection 8.2.2(b), in the event of a “Paragraph IV” certification under the Hatch-Waxman Act of 1984, if, by the thirtieth (30th) day following Otsuka’s receipt of the notice required under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(B)(i) and (ii), Otsuka (A) has not commenced a patent infringement suit against the putative infringer as contemplated by the relevant regulations; and (B) has not confirmed to BMS that it intends to do so within forty-five (45) days of the date of Otsuka’s receipt of such notice, Otsuka shall be deemed to have decided not to pursue remedies within the meaning of Clause (1) above, thereby enabling BMS to pursue remedies under this Subsection 8.2.2(b).

(ii) Otsuka shall cooperate with BMS as reasonably requested by BMS in connection with such action, dispute or proceeding commenced by BMS in accordance with this Subsection 8.2.2(b), shal


 
SITE SEARCH

AGREEMENTS / CONTRACTS

Document Title:

Entire Document: (optional)

Governing Law:(optional)


Try our advanced search >>
 

CLAUSES

Search Contract Clauses >>

Browse Contract Clause Library>>

Get Email Updates
Email:
This is only a partial view of this document. We have millions of legal documents and clauses drafted by top law firms. learn more search for free browse for free learn more